Why no EOM in QFT with higher than second order derivatives in time and space?

Phiphy
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
When we write down a Lagragian for a quantum field theory, it is said that it should not depend on the second and higher order time and space derivatives of \phi, because we want the equation of motion(EOM) to be at most second order. Why is it so important. What trouble will a higher order EOM cuase in physics? Could anyone give me some examples? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tale says that the problem is non-locality, that is you'd generate a Taylor series expansion.
 
Non-locality happens when there are negative powers of momentum in the lagrangian. A finite series of positive powers of momentum is still local. There must be some other physical reasons to rule out higher powers of momentum.
 
why do negative powers of momentum yield non-locality and in what sense?
 
Effective field theories sometimes have higher derivative powers. But, a field theory with any higher derivative terms will not be renormalizable and, so, would be expected not to be a fundamental theory.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top