Why potential energy alone, not kinetic energy?

AI Thread Summary
In electrostatics, charges possess potential energy due to the forces acting on them, while kinetic energy is absent when charges are stationary. When a particle is placed in an electric field and held in equilibrium, it has potential energy; once it moves, it converts this potential energy into kinetic energy. The discussion also addresses the bulging effect at the edges of parallel plates with different potentials, explaining that the electric field lines are uniform near the center due to the combined effects of all surface particles, but curve at the edges due to the lack of surrounding electric fields. Additionally, the transfer of electrons during friction, such as rubbing a glass rod with silk, is questioned, along with the phenomenon of experiencing a shock after walking on a carpet and touching a metal doorknob. Understanding these concepts requires a grasp of electric field behavior and particle interactions in electrostatic contexts.
logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My physics textbook on the topic " Electrostatics" says, charges have force acting on them, so they possesses potential energy. My question is " Why potential energy alone, not kinetic energy?"

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well it's electroSTATIC, so the charge isn't moving. Electrostatic force is exerted by stationary particles.

To answer your question more broadly:

Imagine a particle is placed into an electric field, and held in equilibrium by some force. Stop time, and remove the force holding it in equilibrium. In this particular instant, the particle possesses potential energy alone. The moment it starts moving, it loses potential and gains kinetic.
 


Can anyone explain me y bulging effect is there at the sides of the two parallel plates of different potentials.. Why Elecric lines of force at the sides are curved?
 


I have one question on electrostatic force.We say that when a glass rod is rubbed on silk cloth,electrons from glass are transferred to silk. Hence glas rod becomes positively charged and the latter negatively charged. But i wonder,can a little amount of friction make electrons to get transferred from glass to silk?What actually happens in the above example.And one more question is that,when we move barefeet on a carpet and then touch a metal door knob,we experience a mild shock.How does this happen?explain please.
 


My question is the same as X-rays has asked above. . .
 


Rockstar3143 said:
Can anyone explain me y bulging effect is there at the sides of the two parallel plates of different potentials.. Why Elecric lines of force at the sides are curved?

The only reason the field lines are uniform nearer the center of two parallel plates is because they are the net result of the combined electric fields from all particles on the plates surface. You see this when using calculus to derive these fields.

At the edges of the plates (the reality where we do not have infinitely long plates) you don't have surrounding electric fields that create this uniform field. The electric field quickly drops off with distance (from each particle: E = q/4∏εr^2.) Also notice that if a plate is finite in size, then there always exists some distance away from it that it could be considered a single particle.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top