Why there is dc component in square signal

AI Thread Summary
A square wave signal sent to a digital oscilloscope can show a DC component due to factors like the internal resistance of the coaxial cable or the oscilloscope's input impedance. The observed DC offset of approximately 17 mV in a ±1 V signal suggests a small error, potentially from the signal generator. Adjustments such as using a large capacitor in series or selecting "AC input" can eliminate the DC component. Additionally, the rise time of the square wave may contribute to the DC offset. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding signal integrity and potential sources of error in measurements.
giulioo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
hi!
when I send a square wave to a digital oscilloscope it detects the signal + dc signal. I wanted to know why. I was thinking about internal resistance of coaxial cable i was using.

signal got out of an oscilloscope/wave generator and in channel A of the same oscilloscope/wg. It was +-1 V, while dc component was something like 17 mV.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
or probably it is due to internal impedance of the oscilloscope?
 
giulioo said:
hi!
when I send a square wave to a digital oscilloscope it detects the signal + dc signal. I wanted to know why. I was thinking about internal resistance of coaxial cable i was using.

signal got out of an oscilloscope/wave generator and in channel A of the same oscilloscope/wg. It was +-1 V, while dc component was something like 17 mV.
This sounds like a small error in the generator. You can remove all DC component by placing a large capacitor in series with the oscilloscope, or selecting "AC input". It is possible that the square wave is not exactly "50/50".
 
well the wave is for sure not exactly 50/50 because of rise time. I haven't thought about it anyway. I will meditate upon it, i mean, rise time could add a dc component.
Do you think input and output resistance could not affect signal in such way too?
I already removed the dc component using an offset.
thank you for your advice!
 
giulioo said:
It was +-1 V, while dc component was something like 17 mV.
17mV DC error in a signal of ±1V - that is an error of ≈ 1%. I would not be able to see that on an oscilloscope. And, as you said, the signal generator might easily give an error of that size.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Back
Top