Why we need a one world government

  • News
  • Thread starter Forestman
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Government
In summary: So we'll need to rely on dirty sources like coal and oil to power our world.- If we put all of our eggs in one basket and rely on renewable energy, we're exposing ourselves to a lot of risk. What if a solar flare knocks out the power grid? What if the wind doesn't blow?Well, I'm certainly not joking. And it's hard to present something to support my conclusion, let's just say that it's my gut feeling.But maybe I'll try to present something rational anyways:- oil and various metals will be depleted within the next 50 years (so I've heard), and
  • #106
Physics-Learner said:
i just watched one of the dvds with a bunch of conversation on it. one of the bigwigs chose the name romulans, because his son was studying the roman empire at the time - LOL.

Heh, that makes sense... I always saw the Vulcan-Romulan dichotomy as a "what if" had the myth of Rome's origins had ended with founding of two great cities. Romulas and Remus both birthing an empire on radically different principles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
dacruick said:
Maybe by that time we will have advanced enough as a race to apply communism properly.
How can involuntary servitude be "applied properly"? Are you saying that "advanced" means that every person volunteers?

There is a reason Stalin and Mao killed people by the millions: Communism is inherently incompatible with the existence of "non-communists" in society, and non-communists exist in society.
 
  • #108
Al68 said:
How can involuntary servitude be "applied properly"? Are you saying that "advanced" means that every person volunteers?

There is a reason Stalin and Mao killed people by the millions: Communism is inherently incompatible with the existence of "non-communists" in society, and non-communists exist in society.

I agree completely.
 
  • #109
Physics-Learner said:
communism fails because it requires people to work hard for the benefit of strangers. but there is one very common instance where communism works great. anyone tell me what it is ?

dacruick said:
A family?

Physics-Learner said:
as the fonz would say - correct-a-mundo.

How is the family unit an example of Communism? Even by your definition above, that would require family members to behave like strangers.
 
  • #110
Gokul43201 said:
How is the family unit an example of Communism? Even by your definition above, that would require family members to behave like strangers.

I could be wrong here, but I believe his point is that it works in the limited instance where you do NOT have to do this for strangers, but family instead.
 
  • #111
nismaratwork said:
I could be wrong here, but I believe his point is that it works in the limited instance where you do NOT have to do this for strangers, but family instead.
But you have a very immediate and direct self interest derived from the well-being of your family. And you enter into a relationship voluntarily, not by fiat. That looks to me more like a capitalist organization than a communist one.
 
  • #112
Gokul43201 said:
But you have a very immediate and direct self interest derived from the well-being of your family. And you enter into a relationship voluntarily, not by fiat. That looks to me more like a capitalist organization than a communist one.

True, which is why I didn't exactly accept that analogy, but I still fail to see how this has to do with interacting with family as though they're strangers. I'd say it's more of a feudal system in most cases, but there is (in the USA) a legal merger of finance, property, and risk so... there are communist elements.
 
  • #113
remember that communism is an economic policy. it is the opposite of capitalism.

in communism, the group gives on the basis of ability, and takes on the basis of need.

the dad and mom are the main givers, while everyone takes based upon their needs.

the children did not enter voluntarily. they were put there - LOL.
 
  • #114
Physics-Learner said:
dont forget the klingons - LOL
Don't forget the Ferengi either.
 
  • #115
FtlIsAwesome said:
Don't forget the Ferengi either.

I liked the original, whip-wielding, slave-trader Ferengi... the modern ones make no sense in a world of replicators!
 
  • #116
And the Cardassians.
 
  • #117
nismaratwork said:
Yet, you had the Borg, Romulans, and others...

borg are the ultimate in other-worldly governance
 
  • #118
Proton Soup said:
borg are the ultimate in other-worldly governance

Agreed.

@FitIsAwesome: I always felt the Cardassians were a cheap version of the Romulans... not a fan of them! :-p
 
  • #119
I wonder what its like to be a borg... :eek::eek::eek:
 
  • #120
Cardassians were lame—but Quark was by far the best Star Trek character ever.
 
  • #121
Perspicacity said:
Cardassians were lame—but Quark was by far the best Star Trek character ever.

Not in small part to the immense talents of the actor, and the writers. I never understood why people didn't seem to enjoy DS-9... I found it to be a change of pace, but one that grew on me.
 
  • #122
We are the Borg. You will be assimilated.
 
  • #123
We are the Ferengi. You will give us your money.
 
  • #124
Gokul43201 said:
But you have a very immediate and direct self interest derived from the well-being of your family. And you enter into a relationship voluntarily, not by fiat. That looks to me more like a capitalist organization than a communist one.
That's exactly right. Voluntary vs. forced is the proper distinction to make, at least politically, since that's the reason for opposition to communism.

And while it's true that children are "forced" into the relationship, using the word communism for that makes about as much sense as using a words like "slaves" or "prisoners" to refer to children. Technically true, yes, but kinda silly.
 
  • #125
Al68 said:
That's exactly right. Voluntary vs. forced is the proper distinction to make, at least politically, since that's the reason for opposition to communism.

And while it's true that children are "forced" into the relationship, using the word communism for that makes about as much sense as using a words like "slaves" or "prisoners" to refer to children. Technically true, yes, but kinda silly.

I don't know... it's pretty literal in many parts of the world unfortunately... and not uncommon at all. I take your general point however.
 
  • #126
FtlIsAwesome said:
We are the Ferengi. You will give us your money.

Right? Assimilated.. :bugeye:

"give us your cash"

:rolleyes:

I love the retcon to explain that "gold pressed latinum" was somehow special and not replicator friendly. :smile:
 
  • #127
nismaratwork said:
I love the retcon to explain that "gold pressed latinum" was somehow special and not replicator friendly. :smile:
Latinum is supposed to one of the only things, or the only thing, that cannot be replicated. I'm not really sure what the gold is for, since I think it can be replicated.


nismaratwork said:
Right? Assimilated.. :bugeye:

"give us your cash"
The Ferengi have discovered how to rewrite the Borg code. They control the Borg now. Give the Ferengi your money or they will command the Borg to assimilate you. :bugeye: :bugeye: :bugeye:
 
  • #128
FtlIsAwesome said:
The Ferengi have discovered how to rewrite the Borg code. They control the Borg now. Give the Ferengi your money or they will command the Borg to assimilate you. :bugeye: :bugeye: :bugeye:
You forgot to tell people how to send the money. The Ferengi accept Paypal sent to the following e-mail address: Al68@yahoo.com.
 
  • #129
Al68 said:
You forgot to tell people how to send the money. The Ferengi accept Paypal sent to the following e-mail address: Al68@yahoo.com.
Arg! :smile:


Well, you'll get a lot of spam now. :biggrin:
 
  • #130
Al68 said:
That's exactly right. Voluntary vs. forced is the proper distinction to make, at least politically, since that's the reason for opposition to communism.

And while it's true that children are "forced" into the relationship, using the word communism for that makes about as much sense as using a words like "slaves" or "prisoners" to refer to children. Technically true, yes, but kinda silly.

did you read my post ? communism is From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

exactly what a family unit does - at least a good mom and dad.
 
  • #131
Al68 said:
You forgot to tell people how to send the money. The Ferengi accept Paypal sent to the following e-mail address: Al68@yahoo.com.

Be honest now, if I sent you money, you'd probably faint from shock. :wink:
 
  • #132
I wonder if that email is valid. :smile:



I didn't know the Ferengi use email.
 
  • #133
nismaratwork said:
Be honest now, if I sent you money, you'd probably faint from shock. :wink:
That's a chance I'm willing to take. Please make it as shocking as possible.
 
  • #134
Physics-Learner said:
did you read my post ? communism is From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

exactly what a family unit does - at least a good mom and dad.
Sure, I agreed that the definition was technically correct, analogous to using the word "prisoner" to refer to children.
 
  • #135
Al68 said:
Sure, I agreed that the definition was technically correct, analogous to using the word "prisoner" to refer to children.

Are you familiar with a form of indentured servitude of children in regions with high poverty?

Oh, and I would not prepare for a shock, but I do appreciate how game you are. :wink:
 
  • #136
nismaratwork said:
Are you familiar with a form of indentured servitude of children in regions with high poverty?
Yes, I should have specified children generally, not a specific case. There are children who really are slaves, prisoners, and communists, but those words aren't normally used to refer to all children, even if technically true.
 
  • #137
Al68 said:
Yes, I should have specified children generally, not a specific case. There are children who really are slaves, prisoners, and communists, but those words aren't normally used to refer to all children, even if technically true.

Fair enough, just making sure... not everyone does know.
 
  • #138
the children don't need to be slaves. communism is not totalitarian. it is simply an economic policy where you give what you can, and take what you need.

the reason it works in a family is because there are emotional ties to one another. the reason it does not work in a country is because there are not those emotional ties to one another.
 
  • #139
Physics-Learner said:
the children don't need to be slaves. communism is not totalitarian. it is simply an economic policy where you give what you can, and take what you need.

the reason it works in a family is because there are emotional ties to one another. the reason it does not work in a country is because there are not those emotional ties to one another.

That explanation works best for my taste, and dovetails with the dysfunctional families as well.
 
  • #140
Perhaps communism on the scale of the world would work if people were genetically engineered to be extremely altruistic and non competitive. Then there would be no conflict between the individual and the group. Once it is perfected the government should provide genetic engineering for everyones future offspring, otherwise a rich superclass of people will be created because only the rich will be able to afford to genetically engineer their offspring.

Also if the worlds population was brought down to at least a billion then there would be enough resources to go around. I don't mean killing people, just not allowing everyone to have children. And for those who would be allowed to have children; only allowing them to have one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
719
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
67
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top