Why We Rattle Things That Are Stuck?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrmonkah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
AI Thread Summary
Rattling stuck objects applies resonance to their natural frequency, potentially increasing amplitude to facilitate removal. The primary purpose of this action is to overcome static friction and dislodge items from ledges or hangups. This method employs a stochastic approach, allowing the object to explore different positions until it frees itself. Tools like impact wrenches exemplify this principle, using rapid force transfer to loosen tightly fastened components. Overall, both engineered and simple rattling techniques effectively break loose debris or rust hindering movement.
mrmonkah
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Im studying Classical Physics and currently covering resonance, one question i got thinking about was why we rattle things that are stuck.

Am i right in thinking that we apply a resonance to the natural frequency of the stuck object in order to magnify it's amplitude and hence give our selves room to remove the object?

Not very well communicated on my part, but is my reasoning sound?

Cheers,

Dan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meh; i think that might be part of it in some cases----definitely the main reason is just to break static friction, and get things off ledges/hangups/etc. You're also taking a stochastic approach---hoping that the object will just kind of eventually find its way out if you force it to explore enough of the space.
 
Rattling two things together can generate huge forces between them.

One example I am familiar with is an impact wrench used by mechanics for tightening and loosening nuts & bolts. There is a rotating mass inside the tool which intermittently engages the output shaft. Angular momentum is transferred almost instantly to the shaft and then to the nut. Since the transfer happens over a very short distance the force involved is huge. The result is that you can apply several hundred foot pounds of torque to a fastener with only very minimal reaction torque applied to the tool.

Other, less precisely engineered forms of rattling will accomplish the same thing.
 
In simpler situations, rattling or tapping with a hammer can just break loose crud such as rust that is hindering movement.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top