- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
In my latest post to the thread
https://mathhelpboards.com/analysis-50/application-supremum-property-further-questions-garling-remarks-theorem-3-1-1-a-26167.htmlI encountered a strange problem ...
***EDIT*** PROBLEM SOLVED ... i retyped offending text ... still don't know what went wrong! My text ...
Then ...
... Garling claims we have \(\displaystyle x \lt p_0 / q_0 \lt y \)...
My question is as follows:
In the above process .. how are we sure that \(\displaystyle p_0 / q_0 \lt y\) ... ?
would not display correctly ... but why?Result was
Then ...
... Garling claims we have $ \displaystyle x \lt p_0 / q_0 \lt y $...
My question is as follows:
In the above process .. how are we sure that $ \displaystyle p_0 / q_0 \lt y$ ... ?
Can someone please help determine what went wrong ...
Peter
https://mathhelpboards.com/analysis-50/application-supremum-property-further-questions-garling-remarks-theorem-3-1-1-a-26167.htmlI encountered a strange problem ...
***EDIT*** PROBLEM SOLVED ... i retyped offending text ... still don't know what went wrong! My text ...
Then ...
... Garling claims we have \(\displaystyle x \lt p_0 / q_0 \lt y \)...
My question is as follows:
In the above process .. how are we sure that \(\displaystyle p_0 / q_0 \lt y\) ... ?
would not display correctly ... but why?Result was
Then ...
... Garling claims we have $ \displaystyle x \lt p_0 / q_0 \lt y $...
My question is as follows:
In the above process .. how are we sure that $ \displaystyle p_0 / q_0 \lt y$ ... ?
Can someone please help determine what went wrong ...
Peter
Last edited: