Will Latex make a comeback someday?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nahya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mind
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculations of electric fields generated by point charges Qa and Qb, using the formula for electric field strength. The net electric field is derived from the contributions of both charges, taking into account their distances and magnitudes. The user expresses frustration with LaTeX not functioning properly, which affects the presentation of their calculations. Despite this, they provide a detailed breakdown of the steps involved in solving the problem, emphasizing the importance of vector calculus. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted remark about the potential for LaTeX to make a comeback in the future.
nahya
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
never mind. sorry :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know where my calculator is, so this might be wrong... but the theory should be there.

Qa
Qb
are point charges.

Thus:
\vec E = \frac{kq}{r^2}\hat r

\vec r_{PQa} = \left[\begin{array}{c} 11 \cross 10^2 m \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

\vec r_{PQb} = \left[ \begin{array}{c} (11+22) \times 10^2 m \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

r_{PQa} = |vec r_{PQa}| = \sqrt{(11\times 10^2 m)^2+(0)^2+(0)^2}=11\times 10^2m

r_{PQb}=33\times 10^2 m

\vec E_{net} = \vec E_{Qa} + \vec E_{Qb} = \frac{kQa}{r_{pQa}^2}\hat r_{Qa} + \frac{kQb}{r_{{pQb}^2}\hat r_{Qb}

Notice that:
\hat r_{Qa}=\hat r_{Qb} = \hat i = \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

Thus:
\vec E_{net} = k\hat i \left(\frac{4\times 10^{-6}}{(11 \times 10^2 m)^2} + \frac{-1 \times 10^{-6}}{33 \times 10^2 m}\right)

After you plug in k and cross of the units you get:
\vec E = \hat i \left((9\times 10^9) \frac{4\times 10^{-6}}{(11 \times 10^2 m)^2} + \frac{-1 \times 10^{-6}}{33 \times 10^2 m}\right)\fraq{N}{C}

Also remember that you can drop the vector notation for \vec E_{net} [/tex] by taking the magnitude of it. And since you only have one component E_{net} is just equal to whatever that calculation is above. Sorry, I really don't feel like doing that by hand... not that it's hard. I'm just too lazy to do it.<br /> <br /> For the second part of your question recall that: <br /> \vec F_{12} = \frac{kq_1 q_2}{r^2}\hat r<br /> <br /> I think you can figure it out from what I showed you above. I gave a very rigrious calculation, not skipping many steps. I find it easier just to think about most questions like this as three dimensional questions, and just do a little bit more steps with the vector calculus.
 
well.. the latex thing isn't working atm, i guess. ^^
i solved the problem, however. i just didn't think about the types of the resulting charges.
 
Why are you taking the absolute value? How are you setting up the problem for the force?
 
Cool. Well I guess you're good.

Maybe some day Latex will come back :)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
709
Replies
57
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
900
Replies
8
Views
674
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top