Work Done on Object When Net Force is Zero

AI Thread Summary
In a scenario where an object is moving at a constant velocity in free space and two equal but opposite forces are applied, work is done by the force in the direction of motion, despite the net work being zero. The discussion highlights that while the opposing forces cancel each other out, the force applied in the direction of motion still contributes to work because the object is already in motion. It is clarified that work is defined as force applied over a distance, and in this case, the movement allows for work to occur. The confusion arises from equating the application of force with the concept of work, emphasizing that work is contingent on displacement. Ultimately, understanding how forces interact with a moving object is crucial in grasping the concept of work done in physics.
kaosAD
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have an object moving in a free space at initial velocity of v (no friction). Then two forces of equal magnitude but opposite directions are applied on the moving object of which one of them is in the same direction as the moving object. Is there work done by that force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it.

If the two applied forces are in exactly opposite directions they are colinear.

So whether you say the work done by one = minus work done by the other = 0
(since the displacement against one is positive and the other negative)

Or

There is not net force so work done = 0

It comes out to the same thing.
 
kaosAD said:
Then two forces of equal magnitude but opposite directions are applied on the moving object of which one of them is in the same direction as the moving object. Is there work done by that force?
Short answer: Yes.

But as Studiot explained, the net work done by both forces is zero.
 
Doc Al said:
Short answer: Yes.

But as Studiot explained, the net work done by both forces is zero.

I'm clearly missing something here. By your logic, If I push really hard on the side of my house and do not manage to move it at all, I have done work. You seem to be saying that both forces do work but cancel each other out. I content that both forces are just "applying force" and that neither of them do any work at all. What am I missing?
 
phinds said:
I'm clearly missing something here. By your logic, If I push really hard on the side of my house and do not manage to move it at all, I have done work. You seem to be saying that both forces do work but cancel each other out. I content that both forces are just "applying force" and that neither of them do any work at all. What am I missing?
You are missing the fact that the object being pushed on is moving. (Why in the world would you think that pushing on a nonmoving object involves doing work?)
 
kaosAD said:
Suppose I have an object moving in a free space at initial velocity of v (no friction). Then two forces of equal magnitude but opposite directions are applied on the moving object of which one of them is in the same direction as the moving object. Is there work done by that force?

Yes.

Consider an aircraft flying at a constant airspeed. The thrust and drag forces sum to zero. The engines are clearly doing work.

Work = force * distance
Power = force * distance/time = force * velocity

In the example of your house the oposing force is friction but you haven't moved the house so you haven't done any work against it.
 
Thanks guys. I bumped on the answer here:
http://electron9.phys.utk.edu/phys135d/modules/m6/Work.htm

and I did not know that many have asked this similar question before. The thread below seems to have a good discussion on that matter:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=482584
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doc Al said:
You are missing the fact that the object being pushed on is moving. (Why in the world would you think that pushing on a nonmoving object involves doing work?)

But the movement was there BEFORE the pushing started, according to the original post, and the forces are applied AFTER it starts moving at a uniform velocity, so I still don't see what you mean. NEITHER of the applied forces is causing any motion, they are just canceling each other out.
 
But the movement was there BEFORE the pushing started, according to the original post, and the forces are applied AFTER it starts moving at a uniform velocity, so I still don't see what you mean. NEITHER of the applied forces is causing any motion, they are just canceling each other out.

Work is done when a Force moves its point of application.

With a moving object the point of application is constantly moving. With a brick wall it is not.

If there is no resistance then no force is required to keep it moving - that is Newtons First Law. Since the force is zero the work = force times distance = 0
 
  • #10
phinds said:
But the movement was there BEFORE the pushing started, according to the original post, and the forces are applied AFTER it starts moving at a uniform velocity, so I still don't see what you mean. NEITHER of the applied forces is causing any motion, they are just canceling each other out.
Consider what happens to a car if you push down on both the gas and brake when it is already moving.
 
  • #11
Studiot said:
Work is done when a Force moves its point of application.

With a moving object the point of application is constantly moving. With a brick wall it is not.

If there is no resistance then no force is required to keep it moving - that is Newtons First Law. Since the force is zero the work = force times distance = 0

Yes, I agree w/ everything you have said but I'm not sure if you are answering my quesion or not, since you have not applied your statements to the OP's situation.

The OP posited a situation where the item is moving in free space at a constant velocity and THEN opposing forces are applied. DOC AI said that these opposing forces cause work to be performed and I say they do not. There IS resistance to each force, but because they cancel each other out, I say that neither is doing any work. Is this not correct?
 
  • #12
phinds said:
But the movement was there BEFORE the pushing started, according to the original post, and the forces are applied AFTER it starts moving at a uniform velocity, so I still don't see what you mean. NEITHER of the applied forces is causing any motion, they are just canceling each other out.
So what? Whether work is done by a force has nothing to do with whether that force has 'caused' the motion.
 
  • #13
phinds said:
The OP posited a situation where the item is moving in free space at a constant velocity and THEN opposing forces are applied. DOC AI said that these opposing forces cause work to be performed and I say they do not. There IS resistance to each force, but because they cancel each other out, I say that neither is doing any work. Is this not correct?
No, it's not correct.

According to your thinking, if you push a block along the floor against friction at constant speed no further work is done by you once the block has attained uniform speed. Do you think that is reasonable?
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
No, it's not correct.

According to your thinking, if you push a block along the floor against friction at constant speed no further work is done by you once the block has attained uniform speed. Do you think that is reasonable?

No, that's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that if you push the block along the floor with a force F1 and then as it's moving uniformly along, you increase the force you are applying by amount F2 AND someone else applies F2 directly against you, nothing changes and the extra force you apply does no work. That seems to me to be exactly the original question except that in that case F1 was posited as zero.
 
  • #15
phinds said:
What I'm saying is that if you push the block along the floor with a force F1 and then as it's moving uniformly along, you increase the force you are applying by amount F2 AND someone else applies F2 directly against you, nothing changes and the extra force you apply does no work.
What do you mean 'nothing changes'? You're pushing harder! That means more work is done (for a given displacement).
 
  • #16
Doc Al said:
What do you mean 'nothing changes'? You're pushing harder! That means more work is done (for a given displacement).

OK, I see what you're saying. Not sure why I was having trouble with this, but I see a way of looking at it that I believe now clarifies it for me.

Take my example above and turn it vertical. If you have to exert force F1 to lift a rock 1 foot and you add another rock (which I see as the oposing force F2) then you have to exert F2 more force to lift the total the same distance. The fact that your additional force F2 in some sense balances the extra rock, does NOT mean it doesn't do any work, which is what I was somehow getting myself confused about.

Thanks.
 
  • #17
A good question to ask oneself when faced with a situation like this is

How is(are) the force(s) applied?

Its not too bad with a stationary object, but a moving one.

How would you apply two equal and opposite forces?

Not so easy - the force must move along with the body or the body must move through a force field.
If you have a force field (eg electric) you can't just apply the same in the opposite direction or the fields would just cancel.
 

Similar threads

B Zero acceleration = zero net force?
Replies
33
Views
2K
I If there is no force being applied can there still be a net force?
Replies
18
Views
2K
B What Happens When The Applied Force Equals the Static Friction Force?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Question about net work and displacement
Replies
12
Views
2K
I How is the net force on the system equal to 0 initially?
Replies
14
Views
1K
Net work done on Earth-object system and potential energy
Replies
8
Views
3K
I Virtual work and constraint forces
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Understanding Net Internal Torque and Kinetic Friction in a System
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Work done in lifting and lowering an object
Replies
34
Views
4K
Work done under constant velocity
Replies
34
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top