MHB Writing equation from a description

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joystar77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
AI Thread Summary
The equation derived from the description is 2(x + y * 3 + 5 * z) = 10, indicating that "by" implies multiplication for the following terms. The discussion emphasizes the importance of interpreting the wording correctly, particularly distinguishing between "by" and "times." Participants agree that the order of operations (PEMDAS) should be applied, as there are no clear groupings provided. Simplifying the equation leads to moving constant terms to one side, but further simplification is limited without additional information. The consensus is that the initial interpretation of the equation is the most accurate.
Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
The result of multiplying 2 by x plus y times 3 plus 5 times z is equal to 10.

2x + y * 3 + 5 * z = 10

2x + 3y + 5z = 10

or

2 (x + y * 3 + 5 * z) = 10

2x + 2y + 6 + 10 + 2z = 10

2x + 2y + 16 + 2z = 10

Can someone please check this for me and tell me which way is right? I forgot how to do these type of problems.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Correct way of doing Algebra Problem

Given the way this is stated I think we can reason that "by" means to multiply everything that follows by 2, since for the other terms multiplication is written as "times". There should be a reason that they used a different word for multiplication.

For the rest of the equation we have to assume that nothing is grouped in a certain way outside of the order of operations (PEMDAS) since we have such little information.

So I agree with this interpretation you wrote:

2 (x + y * 3 + 5 * z) = 10

You can simplify that some by getting all terms without a variable to the right side but other than that you can't do anything else.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top