Yarman Geometric Norm or Impedence Normalization

AI Thread Summary
Normalization of impedance in antenna network optimization involves adjusting all impedance values to a standard reference, typically 1 ohm, by dividing each value by the system's characteristic impedance, such as 50 or 75 ohms. The Yarman geometric norm, referenced in the software manual, is not widely documented online, making it challenging to find detailed information. Users suggest that this norm may relate to specific techniques used in antenna design, particularly in conjunction with real frequency methods. The discussion highlights the need for further resources or contact with the software's creators for clarification. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effectively utilizing the software for antenna optimization.
anothnagle
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm working with some old software to optimize antenna networks, and I've come across some stuff that I don't understand. For the software to run, all impedence values entered must be normalized to 1 ohm. What does it mean to normalize an impedence and how do I do it? Also, the manual for the software keeps referring to a Yarman geometric norm when it talks about normalizing these impedences. What is a Yarman geometric norm?

I apologize if I sound daft. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
anothnagle said:
I'm working with some old software to optimize antenna networks, and I've come across some stuff that I don't understand. For the software to run, all impedence values entered must be normalized to 1 ohm. What does it mean to normalize an impedence and how do I do it? Also, the manual for the software keeps referring to a Yarman geometric norm when it talks about normalizing these impedences. What is a Yarman geometric norm?

I apologize if I sound daft. Any help would be much appreciated!

Hmm. Google is not very helpful with Yarman geometric norm, which is strange.

I'd guess that normalization would just be dividing all impedances by the characteristic impedance of the system you are working with (50 Ohms or 75 Ohms, etc.). But I suppose it could be more complicated than that.

The manual doesn't list any references? Does the company still exist and have a website? If not, do you see any author names that you could try to figure out how to contact to ask your questions?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks Aleph! :smile:
 
Oh, okay! That actually makes more sense considering that the software uses the real frequency technique.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Back
Top