- #456
etotheipi
what the f*ck has happened to my youtube recommendations
Check out this thread in the Classical Physics sub-forum.Ivan Seeking said:I think I know the key to how it works. Anyone want to explain?
The TL;DR version:Ivan Seeking said:I think I know the key to how it works. Anyone want to explain?
Let me state that another way: Calculate the maximum speed based on the initial wind speed V.DaveC426913 said:The TL;DR version:
Three key facts:
- A sailboat can sail downwind off wind faster than the wind. (i.e. on a broad reach, it is possible for a sailboat to beat a drifting balloon. (07m30s)
- This effect can be utilized, although not on the way one might expect. (8m05s)
- The propeller is not driving the wheels. (This is the key key.) In fact, the wheels are driving the propeller. The propeller is what is pushing the vehicle forward - which is why it can exceed the wind speed. (10m58s).
I don't know how I would do that, but wouldn't you need to know how the gadget works (to know what forces are involved) to figure that out?Ivan Seeking said:Let me state that another way: Calculate the maximum speed based on the initial wind speed V.
You simply assign variables for air friction, road friction, blade size, design, and pitch, etc... If you really understand how it works, you can set up the problem. The actual numbers are irrelevant.DaveC426913 said:I don't know how I would do that, but wouldn't you need to know how the gadget works (to know what forces are involved) to figure that out?
Anyway, they managed to achieve a much higher v than I assumed. They managed to reach 2.8 times wind speed!
If you have thrust to drag ratio for the airfoil, that should be enough.Ivan Seeking said:You simply assign variables for air friction, road friction, blade size, design, and pitch, etc... If you really understand how it works, you can set up the problem. The actual numbers are irrelevant.
The key is to determine precisely how energy is added to the system.
jbriggs444 said:If you have thrust to drag ratio for the airfoil, that should be enough.
Friction with the ground is irrelevant since one can make the craft as massive as is required to obtain the requisite traction. Friction with the air is irrelevant since one can make the prop as large as required (ignoring materials issues). Blade size, design and pitch are irrelevant if one can distill the performance down to thrust versus drag.
This is General Discussion. In particular, "YouTube Classics, Part Deux".Ivan Seeking said:Is this a bar or Physics Forums? Perhaps I took a wrong turn. ;)
And a thread was linked. ;)jbriggs444 said:This is General Discussion. In particular, "YouTube Classics, Part Deux".
nsaspook said:
collinsmark said:Here's an update on the faster than wind, downwind vehicle. For technical discussions, there is already a thread in place for this here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...the-least-confusing-explanation.896869/page-3
Another fascinating video from the same channel and about the same submarine:DennisN said:I saw an absolutely fascinating video some time ago.
It's a tour of a modern nuclear submarine (US), including when it it traveling and navigating below the ice sheet in the Arctic. I also thought it was very interesting to hear various members of the crew getting interviewed. And it's interesting from a technological viewpoint too, of course, submarines are quite impressive vehicles.
Oh my goodness. Is there some subset of that 42 minute video that maximizes the ratio of informativity per unit time?DennisN said:How to Surface a Submarine in the Arctic Ocean - Smarter Every Day 260
DennisN said:Anyone into very spicy food?
I just saw a funny video where the two spice-eating legends Chili Klaus (Denmark) and Sean Evans (US) try the second hottest pepper in the world, the Carolina Reaper with a Scoville scale of 1'569'300 (no 1 is a pepper called Pepper X). The two fellows are very used to hot food, and their reactions are a testament of the potency of these little beasts of fruit.
Sean Evans and Chili Klaus Eat the Carolina Reaper, the World's Hottest Chili Pepper
collinsmark said:I used to be a connoisseur of hot sauce, of sorts.
Today, I still eat a lot of spicy foods, and consistently use Tabasco, Sriracha, Valentina, and now Frank's RedHot, that I pretty much just slather on anything, and always have on hand. But I don't get into the really, really hot stuff like I used to.
You'll notice in the video there is a bottle of Mad Dog 357 on the table. That stuff is very hot, but the company had released a much, much hotter version called "Mad Dog 357, Silver Collector's Addition" that boasted 6 million Scoville units. It comes with a (decorative) bullet, and I had to sign a waiver to buy a couple bottles. I still have a spare, unopened bottle, just in case.
View attachment 287322
I stopped using the really, really hot stuff though, after one time where I inadvertently, albeit temporarily (maybe a few minutes), lost all feeling in my feelings (and various body parts too).
nsaspook said:
Leo Liu said: