Lorentz Transformations in xy & xyz Directions | Pat

Click For Summary
Lorentz transformations for inertial frames moving in the x-direction are straightforward, with y' and z' remaining unchanged. However, when considering motion in the xy or xyz directions, the transformations become more complex and involve additional parameters. The discussion references a paper by Byron L. Coulter that addresses relativistic motion in a plane, suggesting that the transformations can be derived using a more generalized approach. Matrix multiplication can also be used to express these transformations, incorporating the relative velocity vector. Overall, the transformations in multidimensional motion require a more intricate formulation than the standard equations for one-dimensional motion.
patapat
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
So I'm looking at some Lorentz transformation equations and it says
x'=\gamma(x-vt)
t'=\gamma(t-vx/c^{2})
y'=y
z'=z

I'm assuming the values for y', y, z' and z only hold true when the inertial frames of S and S' are moving at a relative velocity in the x-direction. With this being said, what would the transformations be if the inertial frames were in an xy or xyz direction? Thanks in advance.

-Pat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lorentz transformation plane motion

patapat said:
So I'm looking at some Lorentz transformation equations and it says
x'=\gamma(x-vt)
t'=\gamma(t-vx/c^{2})
y'=y
z'=z

I'm assuming the values for y', y, z' and z only hold true when the inertial frames of S and S' are moving at a relative velocity in the x-direction. With this being said, what would the transformations be if the inertial frames were in an xy or xyz direction? Thanks in advance.

-Pat
As far as I know the situation is known as plane motion. Your question is answered in

Relativistic motion in a plane
Byron L. Coulter
Am. J. Phys. 48, 633 (1980) Full Text: [ PDF (486 kB) GZipped PS Order ]
I think it can be simplified.
 
patapat said:
So I'm looking at some Lorentz transformation equations and it says
x'=\gamma(x-vt)
t'=\gamma(t-vx/c^{2})
y'=y
z'=z

I'm assuming the values for y', y, z' and z only hold true when the inertial frames of S and S' are moving at a relative velocity in the x-direction. With this being said, what would the transformations be if the inertial frames were in an xy or xyz direction? Thanks in advance.

-Pat

If (\mathbf{r},t) are space-time coordinates of an event in the reference frame O, and the reference frame O' moves with velocity \mathbf{v} = c \vec{\theta} \theta^{-1} \tanh \theta with respect to O, then space-time coordinates (\mathbf{r}',t') of the same event in O' can be obtained by formulas

\mathbf{r}' = \mathbf{r} + \frac{\vec{\theta}}{\theta}(\mathbf{r} \cdot \frac{\vec{\theta}}{\theta}) (\cosh \theta - 1) - \frac{\vec{\theta}}{\theta} ct \sinh \theta

t' = t \cosh \theta - (\mathbf{r} \cdot \frac{\vec{\theta}}{\theta}) \frac{\sinh \theta}{c}

These formulas are derived by the same procedure as momentum-energy Lorentz transformations (see eq. (4.2) - (4.3) in http://www.arxiv.org/physics/0504062 )

Eugene.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
t'=\gamma(t-{\vec r}\cdot{\vec v}/c^2)
 
Last edited:
The previous reply is three equations, I couldn't get Latex to do line by line.
r_\parallel and r_\perp are parallel and perp to v.
 
And if you know matrix multiplication,
B = \begin{pmatrix} \gamma &amp; -\gamma \beta_1 &amp; -\gamma \beta_2 &amp; -\gamma \beta_3 \\<br /> -\gamma \beta_1 &amp; 1 + \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1^2}{\beta^2} &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1\beta_2}{\beta^2} &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1\beta_3}{\beta^2} \\<br /> -\gamma \beta_2 &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1\beta_2}{\beta^2} &amp; 1+\frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_2^2}{\beta^2} &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_2\beta_3}{\beta^2} \\<br /> -\gamma \beta_3 &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1\beta_3}{\beta^2} &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_2\beta_3}{\beta^2} &amp; 1 + \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_3^2}{\beta^2}<br /> \end{pmatrix}
where \beta = (\beta_1, \beta_2, \beta_3) is a unit vector in the direction of the relative velocity, and
x&#039; = B x for x = (c t, x, y, z) and similar for the transformed system x&#039;.

Source: Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, chapter 11.7[/size]
 
I had a feeling there was no simple answer, thanks guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K