In modern physics, the double-slit experiment is a demonstration that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles; moreover, it displays the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanical phenomena. This type of experiment was first performed, using light, by Thomas Young in 1801, as a demonstration of the wave behavior of light. At that time it was thought that light consisted of either waves or particles. With the beginning of modern physics, about a hundred years later, it was realized that light could in fact show behavior characteristic of both waves and particles. In 1927, Davisson and Germer demonstrated that electrons show the same behavior, which was later extended to atoms and molecules. Thomas Young's experiment with light was part of classical physics long before the development of quantum mechanics and the concept of wave-particle duality. He believed it demonstrated that the wave theory of light was correct, and his experiment is sometimes referred to as Young's experiment or Young's slits.
The experiment belongs to a general class of "double path" experiments, in which a wave is split into two separate waves that later combine into a single wave. Changes in the path-lengths of both waves result in a phase shift, creating an interference pattern. Another version is the Mach–Zehnder interferometer, which splits the beam with a beam splitter.In the basic version of this experiment, a coherent light source, such as a laser beam, illuminates a plate pierced by two parallel slits, and the light passing through the slits is observed on a screen behind the plate. The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing through the two slits to interfere, producing bright and dark bands on the screen – a result that would not be expected if light consisted of classical particles. However, the light is always found to be absorbed at the screen at discrete points, as individual particles (not waves); the interference pattern appears via the varying density of these particle hits on the screen. Furthermore, versions of the experiment that include detectors at the slits find that each detected photon passes through one slit (as would a classical particle), and not through both slits (as would a wave). However, such experiments demonstrate that particles do not form the interference pattern if one detects which slit they pass through. These results demonstrate the principle of wave–particle duality.Other atomic-scale entities, such as electrons, are found to exhibit the same behavior when fired towards a double slit. Additionally, the detection of individual discrete impacts is observed to be inherently probabilistic, which is inexplicable using classical mechanics.The experiment can be done with entities much larger than electrons and photons, although it becomes more difficult as size increases. The largest entities for which the double-slit experiment has been performed were molecules that each comprised 2000 atoms (whose total mass was 25,000 atomic mass units).The double-slit experiment (and its variations) has become a classic for its clarity in expressing the central puzzles of quantum mechanics. Because it demonstrates the fundamental limitation of the ability of the observer to predict experimental results, Richard Feynman called it "a phenomenon which is impossible […] to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery [of quantum mechanics]."
I just posted this as a reply, but i figured Id open a new thread for discussion.
correct me if I am wrong here.
according to the double slit experiment, a photon takes every possible path to it's destination, causing it to interfere with itself, right? My first question is, does each...
Hello all,
I saw this setup for a quantum eraser:
http://grad.physics.sunysb.edu/~amarch/PHY5656.gif
In this setup, we get no interference:
http://grad.physics.sunysb.edu/~amarch/PHY5658.gif
Then, by inserting a polarizer we can erase the which way information:
Setup with...
Recently Paulus and his team had reported observation of interference in time.
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/9/3/1/1?rss=2.0
http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0503165
It is a marvellous experiment. But, it appears the work is not fully explained and the experimental results need careful...
Recently Paulus and his team had reported observation of interference in time.
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/9/3/1/1?rss=2.0
http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0503165
It is a marvellous experiment. But, it appears the work is not fully explained and the experimental results need careful...
Recently Paulus and his team had reported observation of interference in time.
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/9/3/1/1?rss=2.0
http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0503165
It is a marvellous experiment. But, it appears the work is not fully explained and the experimental results need careful...
I once read about a modified double slit experiment where the distance between one slit and the source was different to distance between the other slit and the source. It gave the usual interference result, and showed the common feature of other double slit experiments, equal distances to both...
Anyone know where to find some well documented Double slit experiment results?
Thorough and complete detailed information on all parts:
Wavelength used, width of slits, separation of slits,
Distance from slits to detection screen or film.
Flat screen or detail on a curve in detection...
A monochromated beam of neutrons (speed 0.40 m/s) is directed through a double slit with 1.0 mm separation. An array of detectors is placed 10m from the slit.
a)what is the de Broglie wavelength of the neutrons?
b)how far off-axis is the first zero-intensity point on the detector array...
Double slit experiment IN TIME !
The famous double slit experiment performed in another way ... The slits are not in space but in time : two positive peaks and one negative peak of an electric field contained in a very short laser pulse...
Hello,
I wondered how one treats the double slit experiment quantum mechanically,
that is, using probability amplitudes,wave functions,etc...to calculate the
intensity on the screen.
If anyone knows a link or a paper or a book where I can find it, that'd be nice.
-Edgardo
I just have some narrow questions and got a headache searching through the other threads to see if they have been answered.
I just want to understand more specifically what is actually going on with the detectors at the slits. 99% of the explanations and descriptions I read about just talk...
single slit problem (simple)
A single slit diffracts laser light of wavelength 610 nm onto a screen 3.25 m away. The distance between the two first-order maxima on either side of the central peak is 3.65 mm. How wide is the slit (in mm)?
I figured the formula \lambda m = d sin(\theta) would...
Hi, just need a quick confirmation I am right with something! :)
If we are considering electrons (for example) going through the double slit experiment one at a time would it be correct to define the wavefunction for the electron as follows?
\Ket{\Psi} = C_1\Ket{\phi_1} + C_2\Ket{\phi_2}...
"In Young's double slit experiment, assuming the distance between the slits is 0.07mm and the wavelength of light used is 600 nm, when the screen is 70 cm away, what kind of interference is there."
I'm not sure what I'm being asked to determine here.
Plugging in the figures into the...
I've been puzzling over the two-slit experiment. There's an alternate setup where you use lasers and prisms.
[A laser beam is split with a half-silvered mirror/prism. Photons take one path or the other and hit one of two detectors. We arbitrarily insert a converging mirror/prism near the end...
there's something that is annoying me, because I can't find a explanation
It's about the classical double slit experiment, where you have two screens, and one of them has 2 narrow slits
then you launch a photon against the screens, and if there are no detectors in the slits, you observe an...
I suppose someone has thought of this but is the supposed "interference" of light particles in the double slit experiment actually only the apparent interference of light particles and actually an interference of paths open for the light particles to travel? I. e. it is something else creating...
I have decided on a physics experiment for high school, but am not sure how to go about doing it, and what materials to use :confused: . Its called the Single photon Double Slit Experiment, similar to the one done by GI Taylor, years ago.
the basic concept is that a single photon is...
Double slit arrangment??
Can anybody help me with this problem?
A thin flake of mica(n=1.58) is used to cover one slit of a double slit interference arrangment.The central point on the viewing screen is now covered by what had been the 5th bright fringe before the mica was used. Find the...
This experiment which is a variation of the double slit experiment , has actually been conducted. We have (a) the source of electrons, (b) screen 1 ( with the double slit ) and finally (c) screen 2 , where the particles are registered. Near the slits in screen 1 and on the far side from the...
In a double-slit experiment it is found that blue light of wavelength 478 nm gives a second-order maximum at a certain location on the screen. What wavelength of visible light would have a minimum at the same location?
-----
I have no clue how to approach this problem but looking in the...
In a double slit experiment it is observed that the distance between adjacent maxima on a remote screen is 1cm. Whats happens to the distance between adjacent maxima when the slit separation is cut in half?
Greetings !
I see that my original thread called "Uncertain Gravity?"
did not get the attention that I hoped it would (a level
at least sufficient to answer the question I'm now separately
posting here).
So, the question:
What does modern physics say about the double slit experiment...