Thermodynamic equilibrium is an axiomatic concept of thermodynamics. It is an internal state of a single thermodynamic system, or a relation between several thermodynamic systems connected by more or less permeable or impermeable walls. In thermodynamic equilibrium there are no net macroscopic flows of matter or of energy, either within a system or between systems.
In a system that is in its own state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium, no macroscopic change occurs.
Systems in mutual thermodynamic equilibrium are simultaneously in mutual thermal, mechanical, chemical, and radiative equilibria. Systems can be in one kind of mutual equilibrium, though not in others. In thermodynamic equilibrium, all kinds of equilibrium hold at once and indefinitely, until disturbed by a thermodynamic operation. In a macroscopic equilibrium, perfectly or almost perfectly balanced microscopic exchanges occur; this is the physical explanation of the notion of macroscopic equilibrium.
A thermodynamic system in a state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium has a spatially uniform temperature. Its intensive properties, other than temperature, may be driven to spatial inhomogeneity by an unchanging long-range force field imposed on it by its surroundings.
In systems that are at a state of non-equilibrium there are, by contrast, net flows of matter or energy. If such changes can be triggered to occur in a system in which they are not already occurring, the system is said to be in a meta-stable equilibrium.
Though not a widely named "law," it is an axiom of thermodynamics that there exist states of thermodynamic equilibrium. The second law of thermodynamics states that when a body of material starts from an equilibrium state, in which, portions of it are held at different states by more or less permeable or impermeable partitions, and a thermodynamic operation removes or makes the partitions more permeable and it is isolated, then it spontaneously reaches its own, new state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium, and this is accompanied by an increase in the sum of the entropies of the portions.
I'm wondering if I'm on the right track and if anyone is willing to steer me on if not:
Equilibrium vapor pressure (EVP—also referred to as saturation vapor pressure) is dependent only on temperature. Outside pressure has no bearing.
Now, of course, with lower external pressure (atmospheric)...
Here is one scenario:
I have placed a metal in my room which is at room temperature. Air has little much heat capacity and metals don't like to store heat. Would heat transfer occur? Whatif I set the temperature of both to a certain degree where it crosses heat capacity of metal but not of air?
(figure)I was able to solve the problem and get the right answer. However, I solved it more with intuition, and I do not get how the force of the person pulling down on the rope makes the force to the left of the backpack equal to force to the right of the backpack.
Equal masses of ice at –10ºC and water at 80ºC are placed in an insulated container and allowed to reach thermal equilibrium. Calculate the equilibrium temperature
Data:
Water(ice): 37,65 J/mol.K Agua (l): 75,29 J/mol.K
## Lf = 6011 J/mol ##
I solved it this way:
## -Q_{l} = Q_{ice} ##
##...
I honestly have no idea where I'm going wrong
i've checked my differentiation using a derivative calculator but the answer is the same.
The answer from the book is \frac{L}{2} + \frac{h^2}{L}
Working:
I set the electrostatic force exerted by the object at (0,0) and (3,0) equal to each other, dividing out k and q2. I was left with q1/d^2 for both terms and substituted in the given charges for each object. I then replaced d^2 for the object at (0,0) with “x^2” and d^2 for the object at (3,0)...
These are the images from Sommerfeld’s Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol 2 chapter 2, section 6, Equilibrium of Incompressible Fluids.
Image 1
Image 2
Doubt 1 : What does it mean for a force to act on a fluid volume? Force acts on a point, force may act on a surface but I’m unable to...
Absolute pressure is gauge pressure + atmos press
Guage press = 1.29 bar G
1 bar = 10^5 Pa
1.29 bar = 129,000 Pa
Atmos Pres = 1.01x10^5 Pa
Absolute pressure = 230,000 Pa
Henrys law: P=KhC
230000Pa = (116x10^3Pa)C
1.98 mole fraction =C
70% CO2 = 1.387 mole fraction
44g Co2 in 1 mole
61.07g...
First I found partition functions of both the systems and hence total energies of them using above formulas.
Z(A) = (1 - e-ε/kT)-1 and Z(B) = (1 + e-ε/kT)
Then I equated these values to the given values of total energies.
I got:
For System A, T(A) = ε/kln(2) > 0
For System B, T(B) =...
Absolute pressure = Gauge press + Atmos press
Atmos press = 105 Pa
Co2 press = 0.1 bar g = 10000Pa
Abs press = 10,105 Pa
Hydrostatic pressure = absolute press + (density)(grav)(height at midpoint)
= 10,105 + (1008)(9.81)(10)
10,8989.8 Pa
Calc CO2 conc by henrys law
P=KHC
C=P/KH
=...
Summary:: .
Consider a container consisting of I2 and I in equilibrium.
I2 <-> 2I (Is there any to write chemical equations here?)
Will both of them separately contribute to the total pressure (as partial pressures)?
If no, why?
If yes, should we use mole fraction or volume composition to...
If a body experiences acceleration in one direction and no acceleration in another (orthogonal) direction, is it accurate to state that the body is in static equilibrium in one direction only? Or is static reserved for strictly no acceleration in any direction? Apologies if this seems pedantic!
Q: Is it true that the value of K depends on the amounts of reactants and products mixed together initially? Explain.
A:NO, Equilibrium and rates of reaction (kinetics) are independent of each other. A reaction with a large equilibrium constant value may be a fast reaction or a slow reaction...
I got a answer by equation the moles i took the n factor of oxalic acid as 2 and the naoh solution came out to be 2M but i got an answer of 4grams but the answer given is 2 grams am i correct ??
Hi everyone,
I am currently trying to work something out in regards to non-equilibrium thermodynamics. If I have a block of metal in vacuum that is being heated by a laser with a constant power P, is it even possible to be able to describe the emission of radiation by the block via the Stefan...
I have been trying to work on this problem, but I keep getting the answer wrong. I would appreciate if someone could help me understand what I did wrong.
Below is my answer and solution:
Hi everyone,
I'm studying an introductory physics course at college, but our teacher is off sick. On top of that, a planned strike means we won't be getting a new science tutor until the start of next month - instead, we've been told to read the textbook and answer the questions. I've got up...
Hi, can anyone see if I have made an error in answering this simple question, my answer is not the one given in the textbook.
Here's my diagram of the system in equilibrium. So the mass has dropped a distance x below the midpoint of PQ:
So the forces balance as:
T1 = g + T2
So, using...
I got the equation --> d=mL/[2*(√(2M)^2-m^2)] where M is one of the masses at either end (multiplied by 2 because... there's two of them.) and m is the mass in the middle of the system. Something that a TA told me was that L, the horizontal distance of the system changes. I'm confused by this...
Morning all
I've recently come across a problem where I get conceptually but cannot apply mathematically if that makes sense.
I understand the position of the third mass must be at the equilibrium point of ##m_1## (##9.0×10^{24}kg##), so ##\Sigma F = 0## right? And not even necessarily zero...
##\int \!dτ = \int \!P.dA.x ##
Here, I am taking torque of the part above the axis##(τ_1)## ,which is clockwise, and the torque of the part below the axis ##(τ_2)##, which is anticlockwise, separately.
Now, let me consider a thin strip ##dx## at a height ##x## from the axis.
##τ_1 =...
I was thinking that we can equate the electrostatic potential energy and the spring energy (as the force is similar to that of a spring so energy will also be 1/2kx^2 ) but i am not getting the correct ans but by equating the net force on one charge to kr i am getting the correct ans can...
Given:
(block a) m = .500kg
(block b) m = .200kg
that's all...
Fg (block a) = (.5)(9.81) = 4.905N = Fn
Fg (block b) = (.2)(9.81) = 1.962N
i think acceleration might go like...
a = (1.962)/(.5 + .2) = 2.8m/s^2 but isn't it supposed to be at equilibrium? So 0m/s^2.
How am I supposed to find...
Good evening everybody.
This is my suggestion for answer.
The tensor is diagonal and the compression is a plane stress
equilibre equation div(σ)=0
so:
So, does that means that
= f(y.z) = Ay+Bz and
=f(x.z)= Cx+Dz
A,B,C and D are constants.
Is that what the question meant?
Thank you in...
It is my assumption that I need to find the chemical potential of the atoms $$\mu_A$$ and for the molecules $$\mu_{A_2}$$,
then use $$\mu_{A_2}+\mu_{A}=0$$ to arrive at the given identity. For $$\mu_A$$, I found that $$\mu_A=k_BTln(n_A\lambda ^3)$$, where
$$n_a=\frac{N_a}{V}$$ and $$\lambda$$...
So my professor covered acids and bases recently, and this is how he presented the method (please see attached word document). I believe its the same as the I.C.E method, though I am not sure. Anyways my problem is perhaps conceptual, but I don't understand why the concentrations at equilibrium...
I was introduced to the concepts like molarity, molality , mole fraction, formality, normality etc. during general chemistry and it was said that these concepts are used to measure the concentration of solutions. But as the thing called Chemical Equilibrium came I was surprised when I read "In...
If you take a system with fixed entropy S0 and let it evolve, it reachs equilibrium. Let Ueq be the energy of the system at equilibrium.
Now take the same system with fixed energy U=Ueq (S is not fixed anymore), how do you know that the equilibrium reached is the same as before, that means with...
When calculating static equilibrium, i know that you have to split for example, F1 into F1x and F1y. when using soh/cah/toa is it always SIN for the Y axis and always Cos for the X axis? I've been following this method and getting it wrong some times it's really stressing me out, Thanks for any...
Hello!
I would like your help to study Science graduate level books and articles, in the following subjects:
1. Far from equilibrium statistics.
2. Information theory and entropy.
3. Negentropy.
4. And Maxwell's demon.
My main goal is to be able to understand and explore the Maxwell's demon...
Hi PF!
Suppose a 2D rectangular channel with wall-normal perpendicular to the downward gravity force ##F## rests is static equilibrium. What shape would the liquid take?
Looking at the equations of motion, I think the following would have to be satisfied: $$\frac{d P}{dy} = -\rho F\\
\Delta P...
[Mentor's note - this post has been edited to ask the interesting physics question while not falling afoul of the forum rule prohibiting discussions of perpetual motion]
On the left is pure water (blue), and on the right is concentrated salt water (green). The red walls in the middle are...
Suppose we have a reversible reaction $$aA + bB <=> cC + dD$$ which is exothermic in the forward direction. If the temperature of the system decreases, the rate of the forward reaction will increase so that the quotient Q increases to the new (higher) value of Kc. This I think I am ok with (I am...
For part a I used conservation of energy.
-m*g*cos(θ)*L+1/2*m*0^2=-m*g*L +1/2*m*v^2 => v = sqrt(2*g*L(1-cos(θ )).
b) For b I was think that T = mg in the equilibrium point but that doesn't invole θ in the answer. So that's why I tought that T*cos(θ ) = mg. So that the tension is mg/cos(θ). But...
In deducing the zeroth law of thermodynamics in micro-canonical ensemble, there is a frequently-mentioned example. Suppose we put two isolated system, system 1 and 2, in contact and allowing them to exchange heat.
The total energy of the combined system is
$$E = {E_1} + {E_2}$$
The total...
We want to calculate the ao/a(teq) of the equilibrium point between ρm and ρr (ρm= ρr )
My book solves it this way;
ρm(t) / ρr(t)= a(t) ⇒
⇒ (ρm/ ρr)teq =1 =
= (ρm/ ρr)o * a(teq)/ ao
I don't understand the a(teq)/ ao part. If ρm(t)= ρο/αo3 and ρr(t)= ρο/αo4 then it should be
ρm(t)/ ρr(t) =...
For part a, A force must be applied so that the entire mass can be 'held up'. Therefore the necessary force must be equal to the gravitation force on all the objects:
m(rod) * 9.8 + m(LB) * 9.8 + m(RB) * 9.8 = 137 N
For part b, (This is where I'm confused) let's set the point at which the...
For equilibrium, using ##\Sigma \vec F = 0##, we get ##n_1 + n_2 = 300\; \text{N}##.
Taking the system as a whole and applying ##\Sigma \vec \tau = 0## about the hinge (pin) at the top from where the load is hung, we get ##n_1 \times (0.8) \times 4 = n_2 \times (0.6) \times 3##, by taking...
Given a box made of perfectly conducting material. At some part of it at t=0 there is a localized magnetic field. It's sourceless and there aren't any dissipation. After t=0 it starts to spread and fill the box. What is the equilibrium state?
Thanks for the answer(s),
Robert
Dear all,
I am back with another Spring problem.
I have tried to use the insights I gained from your help last time:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/find-v-x-of-a-mass-suspended-from-a-spring.972942/page-3#post-6190934
I figured I start with calculating the new equilibrium by ## x...
The question doesn't specify whether we're talking about translation or rotational equilibrium, so I suppose it's both: In order for the body to have translational equilibrium:
60 N + F2 = 0
F2 = -60N
However, in order to have rotational equilibrium:
60 N * 3m + F2 *8 m = 0
60 N * 3m - 60 N...
If I can determine the weight of that heavy object placed on the plank, I will be able to determine the stretch of that wire. But, when using the second condition for static equilibrium (torques of the system equal to 0), I always end up with two unknowns, no matter what point of rotation I...
So I answered 1 and 2, got:
1. ##\vec(r)(\theta,\phi)=l(sin \theta cos \phi, sin \theta sin \phi, -cos \theta)##
2. ##L=\frac{ml^2 (\dot{\theta}^2+\dot{\phi}^2 sin^2 \theta)}{2}+mglcos \theta##
3. a ##mlsin \theta -mgsin \theta =l^2 \ddot{\theta}## , b. ##ml^2 \ddot{\phi}=0##
4. I know...
I have a solution, However Cant understand 1 point.Now, This is the solution:
##N_2 l cos\theta + \frac 1 2 F_g l cos\theta - f_2 l sin\theta = 0##
## N_2(1 - \mu tan\theta) + \frac 1 2 F_g = 0##
This is the the point that I don't like - yes it is less that 0, but it's even less that...