In the mathematical field of graph theory, a Hamiltonian path (or traceable path) is a path in an undirected or directed graph that visits each vertex exactly once. A Hamiltonian cycle (or Hamiltonian circuit) is a Hamiltonian path that is a cycle. Determining whether such paths and cycles exist in graphs is the Hamiltonian path problem, which is NP-complete.
Hamiltonian paths and cycles are named after William Rowan Hamilton who invented the icosian game, now also known as Hamilton's puzzle, which involves finding a Hamiltonian cycle in the edge graph of the dodecahedron. Hamilton solved this problem using the icosian calculus, an algebraic structure based on roots of unity with many similarities to the quaternions (also invented by Hamilton). This solution does not generalize to arbitrary graphs.
Despite being named after Hamilton, Hamiltonian cycles in polyhedra had also been studied a year earlier by Thomas Kirkman, who, in particular, gave an example of a polyhedron without Hamiltonian cycles. Even earlier, Hamiltonian cycles and paths in the knight's graph of the chessboard, the knight's tour, had been studied in the 9th century in Indian mathematics by Rudrata, and around the same time in Islamic mathematics by al-Adli ar-Rumi. In 18th century Europe, knight's tours were published by Abraham de Moivre and Leonhard Euler.
Hallo!
My question relates to the use of basis states to form operator matrices...
In the context of quantum spin chains, where the Hamiltonian on a chain of N sites is defined periodically as:H = sumk=0N-1[ S(k) dot S(k+1) ] (apologies for the notation)
so there is a sum over k=0 to N-1...
Homework Statement
I'm solving Goldstein's problems. I have proved by direct substitution that Lagrange equations of motion are not effected by gauge transformation of the Lagrangian:
L' = L + \frac{dF(q_i,t)}{dt}
Now I'm trying to prove that Hamilton equations of motion are not affected...
I have a question on the Hamiltonian from a classical viewpoint.
I understand that the Hamiltonian, H, is conserved if it has no explicit time dependence, in other words:
\frac{\partial H}{\partial t} = 0
What I am not clear on is how one can determine whether a given Hamiltonian...
Hi, guys,
I do not know how to determine the Hamiltonian matrix of the following question with the basis of two stationary state. Pls give me some hints about it.
Consider first a single Hydrogen atom, made up of a proton at some location A in space, and an electron. We assume that the...
Homework Statement
Write down the full Hamiltonian for a hydrogen atom in an external field. Next, calculate the energy changes deltaE (not absolute E) of the three orbitals Y01, Y11, and Y-11 induced by the applied magnetic field Bz. Interpret your results with respect to your knowledge of...
"Consider an infinitely sharp pin of mass M and height H perfectly balanced on its tip. Assume that the mass of the pin is all at the ball on the top of the pin. Classically, we expect the pin to remain in this state forever. Quantum mechanics, however, predicts that the pin will fall over...
Homework Statement Consider two Ising spins coupled together
−βH = h(σ1 + σ2) + Kσ1σ2,
where σ1 and σ2 commute and each independently takes on the values ±1.
What are the eigenvalues of this Hamiltonian? What are the degeneracies of the states?
The Attempt at a Solution Four possible...
Can anybody explain what is meant by positive definite Hamiltonian? All I know is that if a Hamiltonian can be factorized as
H={Q}^{\dagger}Q
then that Hamiltonian is one such example. But I am not sure if that is the definition of a positive definite Hamiltonian. In the quantum mechanical...
I did search for topics in this forum. but i could not find basics that deal with hamiltonian of the system
Well I'm pretty new to the field of quantum mechanics. I just could not understand what exactly it means by the hamiltonian of a system? I was told that it describes the total energy of...
Matrix Hamiltonian?
Homework Statement
I have two non-identical spin 1/2 particles, which have vector magnetic moments S_1 and S_2. The interaction energy (Hamiltonian) is given by a constant times the dot product of S_1 and S_2. There is no external field present.
I need to find the...
After several failures in the past (why does the universe have to be so complicated?!), I'm once again trying to learn to understand the basics of QM, out of sheer frustration with not knowing what the heck physicists are talking about all the time. I know, I still have a long way to go...
I'm using McQuarrie's "Quantum Chemistry" book for a little bit of light reading. He included a proof of a theorem that states that if a Hamiltonian function is separable, then the eigenfunctions of Schrodinger's equation are the products of the eigenfunctions of the simpler "separated"...
I'm preparing for an exam at the moment and in one of the past exams the is a question asking to prove that the hamiltonian operator can be expressed in terms of the ladder operators.
The solution is this
(The minus sign didn't come out in the last line, and obviously there is one more...
In the Anderson model, it cost an energy Un_{\Uparrow}n_{\Downarrow} for a quantum dot level to be occupied by two electrons. Here n_{\Uparrow} is the second quantized number operator, counting the number of particles with spin \Uparrow. I need the term Un_{\Uparrow}n_{\Downarrow} in first...
Hi all,
could someone give me a quick answer on the exact conditions for the hamiltonian to be non degenerate, i.e. to have different eigenvalues?
thanks in advance.
In the volume III of R Feynman series which is on Quantum Mechanics , please explain to me the eq.8.43 given on page 1529, i know how we got the equation but the 2nd part of 1st equation (H12)C2, what does it mean ?
Hello everyone!
I'm trying to find the relation between the lagrangian density and the hamiltonian, does anyone know how they are related? I also need a reference where I can find the relation.
Thanks!
Hi all!
I'm starting to study the time evolution operator, and now i came up with this objective... i need a time dependant hamiltonian! since no fundamental interaction is time dependent i need to think of a system in such a configuration that i have a time dependency on H.
Anyway, if anyone...
Hey does anybody have an idea of how to prove that
\frac{d}{dt}\left\langle{XP}\right\rangle= 2\left\langle{T}\right\rangle-\left\langle{x\frac{dV}{dx}}\right\rangle for a hamiltonian of form
H=\frac{P^2}{2M}+V(x)
where X is the position operator, P is the momentum and T is the kinetic...
So I'm trying to solve the following Hamiltonian system using Mathematica.
solution = NDSolve[{x'[t] == 2p[t], x[0] == 2,
p'[t] == I*(2 + 1/2)(I*x[t])^(1 + 1/2), p[0] == 1-2*I}, {x, p}, {t,0,10}, MaxSteps -> Infinity][[1]];
I'm letting E=1, so at all points t, it should be that...
I was thinking of how to solve the single particle Hamiltonian
H=...+\sum_i \frac{1}{\vec{r}-\vec{r}_i}
where \vec{r}_i=i\cdot\vec{a}
Transforming it into second quantization k-space I had terms like
H=...+\sum_G...c^\dag_{k+G}c_k
But it seems to me that for the method of trial wavefunctions any...
Various problems in my textbook ask me to sketch the level curves for a Hamiltonian system, but they don't suggest how to go about it. I know that I need to determine the eigenvalues for each equilibrium point in the given system, and these values hint at the behavior of solutions near each...
I’m trying to decipher this particular passage from a paper.
Ref: FM Kronz, JT Tiehen - Philosophy of Science, 2002 “Emergence and Quantum Mechanics”
Can you provide an example of a physical system which corresponds to a classical system with a nonseparable Hamiltonian (ex: the Milky Way...
I would guess that they would as every observable is a function of the q's and p's and as those commute with the hamiltonian I couldn't imagine an observable that wouldn't commute, however are there any other cases where an observable won't commute with the hamiltonian?
Homework Statement
I found the following problem in two places.But I doubt the first one is wrong.
Let \ u_1(\ x ) and \ u_2(\ x ) are two degenerate eigenfunctions of the hamiltonian \ H =\frac{\ p^2 }{2\ m }\ + \ V (\ x )
Then prove that
\int...
I was wondering if anyone knows of systems for which the Hamiltonian is not equall to the total energy? This is an interesting problem in analytic mechanics (e.g. Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics) but is rarely, if ever, mentioned in forums and newsgroups. I'd love to see a large set of...
Hey I was just wondering what the differences between the three forms of mechanics were. I've only studied basic Newtonian mechanics so I'm not really sure about the other two. Could anyone elaborate?
I have to show that the hamiltonian for a homogeneous system can be simplified in scaled coordinates.
The first two terms I can convert to scaled coordinates <T>+<V> whereas I have some trouble for the last term
-½* \int d³r d³r' \frac{n²}{|r-r'|}
where n is the density. The scaled...
[SOLVED] rotationally invariant hamiltonian
Homework Statement
Show that the Hamiltonian H = p^2/2m+V_0r^2 corresponding to a particle of mass m and
with V_0 constant is
a) rotationally invariant.
Homework Equations
Rotation operator: U_R(\phi ) = \exp (-i \phi \vec{J} / \hbar...
momentum operator in Hamiltonian
Hello all. I'm in an introductory QM course as a physics major. As I understand it, to quantize a classical system, we just replace momentum in Hamiltonian with momentum operator?
But why? One answer is that because it works.
Is there any other reasons why it...
Eigenstates of interacting and non-interacting Hamiltonian
Have multi-particle state of full Hamiltonian and one-particle state of free Hamiltonian non-zero scalar product? Intuitively one can say that scalar product of such states should be zero because each of these states mentioned above...
I had encountered a problem for which I need to know how to proceed in order to solve it.
Taking a particle m with box potential (one dimensional) where V(x) = 0 when mod(x) <=a and V(x) = infinity when mod(x) > a and where wave function phi(x) = A (phi1(x) + ph2(x)) where phi1(x) and phi2(x)...
hello all,
i'm an EE student,and I've recently started studying quantum mechanics.
most textbooks start with schrodinger's equation directly but a few others (like say Liboff) start with the concept of hamiltonian from hamiltonian mechanics.
is a knowledge of the same i.e...
Homework Statement
Show that the Hamiltonian of the Heisenberg model can be written as:
H=\sum^{N}_{k=1}[H_{z}(k)+H_{f}(k)]
where
H_{z}(k)\equivS^{z}(k)S^{z}(k+1)
H_{f}(k)\equiv(1/2)[S^{+}(k)S^{-}(k+1)+S^{-}(k)S^{+}(k+1)]
Homework Equations
As above
The Attempt at a Solution
I...
For an atom with one electron and nuclear charge of Z, the Hamiltonian is:
H=-~\frac{\nabla^{2}}{2}~- ~\frac{Z}{r}~
1) show that the wavefunction:
\Psi_{1s}=Ne^{-Zr}
is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian
2) find the corresponding energy
3) find N, the normalisation constant
In...
1. (from Marion 7-29)
A simple pendulum consist of a mass m supended by a massless spring with unextended length b and spring constant k. The pendulum's point of support rises vertically with constant acceleration a. Find the Lagrange equation of motion.
Does the motion of the mass...
i know this is sort of an obvious question but what is the difference between the hamiltonian and energy momentum tensor since they are both matrices and energy and momentum are equivalent? are they different in terms of the cicumstances in which they are used.
what is the difference between these two formalism and when are each used? also is it true the lagrangian formalism is used more in qft, if so i am curious to know why?
Is it possible to say that for a general Schrödinger equation
i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} | \psi (t) \rangle = \hat{H} | \psi (t) \rangle
one may obtain the general Hamiltonian operator
\hat{H} = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}
Thanks!
Hi!
I've been studying Dirac's programme for some time and I realized that there's something missing:
Actually this is missing in every standard book on classical mechanics concerning how constraints are implemented in the lagrangian.
They are usually inserted with some unknown variables...
Homework Statement
Let V = V_r - iV_i, where V_i is a constant. Determine whether the Hamiltonian is Hermitian.
Homework Equations
H = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}*\Delta^2+V_r - iV_i
The Attempt at a Solution
I think you can distribute the Hamiltonian operator as follows:
H^{\dag} =...
The equation for the Hamiltonian is H = T + V. Can someone explain how you can use this to get this equation for a free particle:
i\hbar|\psi'> = H|\psi> = P^2/(2m)|\psi>
The first part is obviously Schrodinger's equation but how do you get H = P^2/2m?
Go to page 151 at the site below...
hey I am i have just finished my final yr from Bangalore.. did phy n maths..interested in pursuing physics in the future.Cld i get some help regarding which books cld b followed if i want to learn Hamiltonian n findin its eigen values. If u cld suggest a book which deals from the basics of the...
I was curious as to the form of the hamiltonian, whose energy eigenstate in the position basis is a gaussian distribution (or minimum uncertainty state, as I've heard from somewhere.) I haven't taken quantum for a few years, and remember studying the minimum uncertainty state as a wavefunction...