In physics, mathematics and statistics, scale invariance is a feature of objects or laws that do not change if scales of length, energy, or other variables, are multiplied by a common factor, and thus represent a universality.
The technical term for this transformation is a dilatation (also known as dilation), and the dilatations can also form part of a larger conformal symmetry.
In mathematics, scale invariance usually refers to an invariance of individual functions or curves. A closely related concept is self-similarity, where a function or curve is invariant under a discrete subset of the dilations. It is also possible for the probability distributions of random processes to display this kind of scale invariance or self-similarity.
In classical field theory, scale invariance most commonly applies to the invariance of a whole theory under dilatations. Such theories typically describe classical physical processes with no characteristic length scale.
In quantum field theory, scale invariance has an interpretation in terms of particle physics. In a scale-invariant theory, the strength of particle interactions does not depend on the energy of the particles involved.
In statistical mechanics, scale invariance is a feature of phase transitions. The key observation is that near a phase transition or critical point, fluctuations occur at all length scales, and thus one should look for an explicitly scale-invariant theory to describe the phenomena. Such theories are scale-invariant statistical field theories, and are formally very similar to scale-invariant quantum field theories.
Universality is the observation that widely different microscopic systems can display the same behaviour at a phase transition. Thus phase transitions in many different systems may be described by the same underlying scale-invariant theory.
In general, dimensionless quantities are scale invariant. The analogous concept in statistics are standardized moments, which are scale invariant statistics of a variable, while the unstandardized moments are not.
Homework Statement
Consider a system of objects labeled by the index ##I##, each object located at position ##x_{I}##. (For simplicity, we can consider one spatial dimension, or just ignore an index labeling the different directions.) Because of translational invariance
##x'_{I}=x_{I}+\delta...
Homework Statement
[/B]
Show that in order for the free Lagrangian to be invariant when ## A^\mu ## is transformed by a transformation U, it has to transform as below:
## A'^{\mu}=\frac i g (\partial^\mu U) U^{-1}+U A^\mu U^{-1} ##
Homework Equations
[/B]
The wording of the problem is a bit...
Q1: How do we prove that a Riemannian metric G (ex. on RxR) is invariant with respect to a change of coordinate, if all we have is G, and no coordinate transform?
G = ( x2 -x1 )
( -x1 x2 )
Q2: Since the distance ds has to be invariant, I understand that it has to be proved...
Consider the Heaviside function ##\Theta(k^{0})##.
This function is Lorentz invariant if ##\text{sign}\ (k^{0})## is invariant under a Lorentz transformation.
I have been told that only orthochronous Lorentz transformations preserve ##\text{sign}\ (k^{0})## under the condition that ##k## is a...
This is my second term in my master's and one of the courses I've taken is QFT1 which is basically only QED.
In the last class, the professor said the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian has a global symmetry under elements of U(1). Then he assumed the transformation parameter is infinitesimal and , under...
I understand that in order to preserve the inner product of two four vectors under a change of coordinates x^{\mu}\rightarrow x^{\mu^{'}}=\Lambda^{\mu^{'}}_{\,\, \nu}x^{\nu} the Minkowski metric must transform as \eta_{\mu^{'}\nu^{'}}=\Lambda^{\alpha}_{\,\...
A complex classical field Φ of particles is, by itself, invariant under global phase changes but not under local phase changes. It is made gauge invariant by coupling it with the EM potential, A, by substituting the covariant derivative for the normal partial derivative in the Lagrangian. But...
Hello,
I am re-reading a book about quantum physics and general relativity. To introduce representation of the lorentz group, they explain the definition of lorentz group as the group of transformation that let x² + y² ... -t² unchanged.
But in cuved space the distance is not the same as in...
Hello. I'm trying to wrap my head around how Lagrangians work in classical field theory.
I have a book that is talking about the gauge invariance of the Lagrangian: \mathscr{L} = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}-J^\mu A_\mu. It shows that we can replace A^\mu with A^\mu+\partial^\mu\chi for...
The part I understand:
I understand that the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the Higgs produces the 'Mexican hat' potential, with two non-zero stable equilibria.
I understand that as the Higgs is a complex field, there exists a phase component of the field. Under gauge transformations of...
In my GR book they discuss things that are invariant, and I know from my math classes that invariant things are very useful. However, my intuition with invariance is that when a coordinate transformation is applied, the object is the same. Scalars are the same scalar in one frame as another...
Homework Statement
Show that all ##n \times n## unitary matrices ##U## leave invariant the quadratic form ##|x_{1}|^{2} + |x_{2}|^{2} + \cdots + |x_{n}|^{2}##, that is, that if ##x'=Ux##, then ##|x'|^{2}=|x|^{2}##.
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
##|x'|^{2} = (x')^{\dagger}(x')...
Homework Statement
Show that all ##n \times n## (real) orthogonal matrices ##O## leave invariant the quadratic form ##x_{1}^{2} + x_{2}^{2}+ \cdots + x_{n}^{2}##, that is, that if ##x'=Ox##, then ##x'^{2}=x^{2}##.
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
##x'^{2} = (x')^{T}(x') =...
please explain what gauge symmetry is, gauge transformation is, gauge invariance is, and also how gauge invariance deletes the timelike polarization of a massless vector boson. without fancy math and formulas.
I've been trying to teach myself the path integral formulation of quantum field theory and there's a point that's really bugging me: why is the integration measure ##\mathcal{D}\phi(x)## invariant under shifts in the field of the form $$\phi(x)\rightarrow\tilde{\phi}(x)=\phi(x)+\int...
Category of simple questions
Obviously I am misunderstanding how an interval of space- time can be invariant under coordinate transformations. The following elementary (but obviously incorrect) calculation will illustrate my difficulty.
Alice is leaving her two boyfriends, Bob and Charlie. Bob...
Claim: The acceleration (both direction and magnitude) for any object is the same in any inertial reference frame.
Is this claim true? I think it is, but someone mentioned to me that time may be an issue as it's not agreed upon in all inertial reference frames.
I'd appreciate any references...
Neil Turok, Director of the Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics in Ontario, Canada suggests scaling invariance is a fundamental property of nature, including spacetime. that nature does not recognize any kind of scale, including Planck scale.
if true how would this affect the leading...
Hi! I have been reading about the position of the center of mass in the Marion's Classical Dynamics book, in some point of the section he states that: "The location of center of mass of a body in uniquely defined, but the position vector R(of the center of mass ofcourse) depends on the...
Homework Statement
Show that the determinant of a ##2 \times 2 ## matrix ## \vec\sigma \cdot \vec a ## is invariant under ## \vec \sigma\cdot \vec a \rightarrow \vec \sigma\cdot \vec a' \equiv \exp(\frac{i\vec \sigma \cdot \hat n \phi}{2})\vec \sigma\cdot \vec a \exp(\frac{-i\vec \sigma \cdot...
Homework Statement
Given a reference frame O' moving at a constant speed $\vec{V}$ in relation to another reference frame O, I want to prove that
##\vec{r_{1B}} \times m_1\vec{v_{1B}} + \vec{r_{2B}} \times m_2\vec{v_{2B}} = \vec{r_{1F}} \times m_1\vec{v_{1F}} + \vec{r_{2F}} \times...
Hi everybody!
Why we don't have to prove Lorentz invariance of the Vacuum state in QFT?
This fact is quite obvious in QED and follows from Lorentz invariance of electric charges.
But in general case?
I don't know, but it seems to me this fact is not so obvious as it treated.
Is it a fact of invariance that a person moving in an enclosed object cannot tell if he/she is moving at constant velocity or standing still (for case when he/she is not being accelerated nor in a gravitational field)? If so, would it be possible to perform an experiment within the closed object...
Hi all,
In A. Djouadi's review for Higgs, volume II, " arXiv:hep-ph/0503173v2 ", Sec. 1.2.3, it discuss the couplings of SUSY new scalars with gauge bosons, there are some points I don't understand:
- CP–invariance forbids WWA, ZZA and W ZH ± couplings
- For the couplings between two Higgs...
In the book "Statistical physics for cosmic structures" at p. 171 a read a definition of scale invariance (leading to the so called scale invariant power spectrum) given as the requirement that ##\sigma^2_M(R=R_H(t)) = constant##, where ##R_H(t)## is the horizon, i.e. the maximal distance that...
In Dodelson's "Modern Cosmology" on p.241 he states that the ##a_{lm}##-s -- for a given ##l##-- corresponding to a spherical harmonic expansion of the photon-temperature fluctuations, are drawn from the same probability distribution regardless of the value of ##m##. Dodelson does not explain...
I recently learned that with (local) gauge invariance, functional quantization needs to factor out volume factor(Faddeev-Popov procedure).
Why does this has to be done?Just to remove infinity? As far as I am concerned, ##\phi^4## theory contains invariance(for example ##\phi\to\phi\cdot e^{i...
Homework Statement
[/B]
So, I need to show Lorentz covariance of a Proca field E-L equation, conceptually I have no problems with this, I just have to make one final step that I cannot really justify.
Homework Equations
"Proca" (quotation marks because of the minus next to the mass part, I...
Hey guys!
I was reading the following paper http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0703260 for Georgi and I have a conceptual question about it.
Howard Georgi was talking about this Unparticle Physics theory and at the base of his analysis is the principle of scale invariance. So Georgi is saying what if...
Homework Statement
Prove that for any three vectors ##\hat a, \hat b ## and ## \hat c##, ##\hat a \cdot (\hat b \times \hat c)## = ##(\hat a \times \hat b) \cdot \hat c ##
Homework Equations
[/B]
## \hat i \cdot \hat i = \hat j \cdot \hat j = \hat k \cdot \hat k = (1)(1)\cos(0) = 1 ##
##...
Homework Statement
Hi Guys,
This is the first exampe from Engel's problem solving book. After a long period of no math I am self studying. I do not know where my knowledge deficits lie, and was recommended this site for help.
"E1. Starting with a point S (a, b) of the plane with 0 < b < a...
I would like to understand the Almost Sure Invariance Principle:
"We say that the functions f_i: [a,b] →ℝ satisfy the Almost Sure Invariance Principle with error exponent γ < 1/2 if there are a probability space supporting a Brownian motion B and a sequence ξ_i, i ≥ 1, such that
(1) {f_i}_{i≥1}...
Consider a Lagrangian: ##L(x,x',t)##
Define now: ##L'(x,x',t) = L + x ##
We have seen that Lagrangians can differ up to a total time derivative of some function ##F(x,t)## in such cases and give the same equation. When checking explicitly these two give different equations. Why would it be...
The measured energy density of the vacuum has a disturbing discrepance with the one theorized by imposig Poincare invariance in QFT, usually referred to as the "vacuum catastrophe".
On the other hand the Heisenberg indeterminacy principle leads to a nonzero vacuum expectation value for the...
Hey guys,
So I have a question about the gauge invariance of the weak field approximation. So if I write the approximation as
\Box h^{\mu\nu} -\partial_{\alpha}(\partial^{\mu}h^{\nu\alpha}+\partial^{\nu}h^{\mu\alpha})+\partial^{\mu}\partial^{\nu}h=0
then this is invariant under the gauge...
My book says that in this case $$e^+e^- \rightarrow \gamma \gamma $$ gauge invariance requires that $$k_{1\nu}(A^{\mu\nu} + \tilde{A}^{\mu\nu})=0=k_{2\mu}(A^{\mu\nu} + \tilde{A}^{\mu\nu})$$ Please see attachment. My question is how does this statement hold?
Hi. This is my first post here in PF ( :) ). I've been reading some threads on "passive" versus "active" diffeomorphisms, and I wondered: what is the physical motivation for having GR be diffeomorphic invariant? Sure, this allows us to have solutions to Einstein's equations (EFE) up to...
To make my explanation easier open the ''Generating function approach'' section on this wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_transformation
The function ##\frac{dG}{dt}## represents the function that always can be added to the Lagrangian without changing the mechanical...
I was trying to prove all those little things you spend long as the local invariance in the free Lagrangian of electroweak interaction.
Taking into account the appropriate SU(2) transformations (without covariant derivatives), came to the following expression
\mathcal{L}_{\text{ferm.}} =...
Homework Statement
Consider Newton’s force law for two particles interact through a central force F12(r1',r2',u1,u2), where by Newton’s third law F12 = -F21.
m1(d^2r1/dt^2) = F12(r1,r2,u1,u2)
m2(d^2r2/dt^2) = F21(r1,r2,u1,u2)
A. Show that Newtonian mechanics is form invariant with respect to...
Hello everyone. I'm studying the fixed point of theory in the context of QFT. First of all, let me say what I think I understood about fixed points and then I'll state my question.
Suppose we have a theory with a certain running coupling ##\lambda(\mu)##. If we have, for example, an UV fixed...
Dear all, this is my first thread in the forum.
I am trying to solve the following problem. it was given during a written exam at my university (many years ago) and I really would appreciate if someone will help me to solve it
1. Homework Statement
Show that if the hamiltonian of the strong...
See the passage attached below.
Consider the 1-loop vertex correction (c.f. p.2 of http://bolvan.ph.utexas.edu/~vadim/classes/2012f/vertex.pdf) and vacuum polarization diagrams in QED. A very simple UV regulator that makes the integrals for the amplitude very simple is the prescription that we...
SR section 1.7. Einstein states if a train and light beam are moving in the same direction, the speed of the light as seen from the train is c-v. ( c being the speed of light and v the speed of the train ). c-v being smaller than c is resolved by time dilation or length contraction.
My...
Hello,
Please excuse me about my ignorance.
I would like to know how SO(2,1) Lie algebra, is derived from operators and commutators.
I have some notes, that the Lie algebra of SO(2,1) is derived from:
[D,H]=-iH
[K,D]=-iK
[H,K]=2iD
where D, H, and K are the "generators".
I have no clue what does...
My question concerns poincare invariance (I have left out the accent) in bosonic string theory. As far as I know, action of a 1-d String is described by poincare invariance. So my question is: why poincare invariance? And here comes the more ambarassing question: What is poincare...
Tests of lorentz violation in space outside earth, planets, our sun, other stars, galaxies and galaxygroups have shown no violations. That is fine.
But do you ladies and gentlemen, know if anyone have tested (experimental and/or theorethical) if there may happen lorentz violations (or if the...
If you shift the universe five meters to the left, there is no observational change.
If you rotate the entire universe, the inertial frame is also rotated, and there is no observable change.
If you freeze time in the universe for one billion years, then resume it, there is no observable...