In mathematics, the limit inferior and limit superior of a sequence can be thought of as limiting (i.e., eventual and extreme) bounds on the sequence. They can be thought of in a similar fashion for a function (see limit of a function). For a set, they are the infimum and supremum of the set's limit points, respectively. In general, when there are multiple objects around which a sequence, function, or set accumulates, the inferior and superior limits extract the smallest and largest of them; the type of object and the measure of size is context-dependent, but the notion of extreme limits is invariant.
Limit inferior is also called infimum limit, limit infimum, liminf, inferior limit, lower limit, or inner limit; limit superior is also known as supremum limit, limit supremum, limsup, superior limit, upper limit, or outer limit.
The limit inferior of a sequence
x
n
{\displaystyle x_{n}}
is denoted by
lim inf
n
→
∞
x
n
or
lim
_
n
→
∞
x
n
.
{\displaystyle \liminf _{n\to \infty }x_{n}\quad {\text{or}}\quad \varliminf _{n\to \infty }x_{n}.}
The limit superior of a sequence
If I set x = 1, I can cancel out y-1 and get limit = 1
Now if I approach from the x-axis the numerator will be smaller or bigger than the denominator, but how would you prove that that does not result in 1 when you reach (x,y) = (1,1)?
TL;DR: Textbook says limit does not exist, but I obviously...
[Moderator's note: Thread spun off from previous thread due to topic/forum change.]
Time dilation sounds really weird, can i assume it has a logical explanation?
The limit itself is pretty easy to calculate
##lim_{T->0} \ lim_{\mu->\epsilon_F} \ (e^{\frac{(\epsilon_F - \mu)}{kT}}+1)^{-1} = \frac{1}{2}##
But I'm very confused about changing ##\epsilon_\vec{k}## to ##\epsilon_F##. Why do we do this?
Hi
I was working on a physics problem and it was almost solved.
Only the part that is mostly mathematical remains, and no matter how hard I tried, I could not solve it.
I hope you can help me.
This is the equation I came up with and I wanted to prove it: $$\lim_{n \rightarrow+ \infty} {...
In Apostol’s Calculus (Pg. 130) they are proving that 1/(x^2) does not have a limit at 0. In the proof, I am unable to understand how they conclude from the fact that the value of f(x) when 0 < x < 1/(A+2) is greater than (A+2)^2 which is greater than A+2 that every neighborhood N(0) contains...
Problem: Prove that $$\lim_{x\to 0}|\frac{|x|} x=\text{Undefined}$$
The solution written by my prof. uses a special case where the tolerance of error ##\epsilon=1/2##. However, I want to proof it with generality, meaning that the tolerance is shrinking.
Below is my attempt at a solution...
The universal speed limit is c, and as a consequence light is confined to that limit. I was thinking about the time dilation in SR and was wondering if this is result of reaching speeds close to the speed of light or because of reaching speed close to c?
For example, let's say light could be...
Given a singular matrix ##A##, let ##B = A - tI## for small positive ##t## such that ##B## is non-singular. Prove that:
$$
\lim_{t\to 0} (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1} = 0
$$
where ##\chi_A## is the characteristic polynomial of ##A##. Note that ##\lim_{t\to 0} \chi_A(B) = \chi_A(A) = 0## by...
This was the question,
The above solution is the one that I got originally by the question setters,
Below are my attempts (I don't know why is the size of image automatically reduced but hope that its clear enough to understand),
As you can see that both these methods give different answers...
Hi,
It's not a homework problem. I was just doing it and couldn't find a way to change the integral limit from "x" to "t". I should end up with kinetic energy formula, (1/2)mv^2. I've assumed that what I've done is correct. Thank you!
Edit:
"E" is work done.
From elementary calculus it is known that
(lim x-->0) ((sin x)/x) = 1.
Is this result equivalent to (lim x-->0) sin x = x ?
If so, how is it proved? Many thanks for all guidance.
I am currently obsessed with futurism but I am terrified I will run out of novums to contemplate about. A novum is an idea like “FTL travel” or “Gene splicing”. I was wondering if their is any proof that their is an unlimited amount of ideas that humans can come up with. My uncle was reading...
Apostol defines limit for vector fields as
> ##\quad \lim _{x \rightarrow a} f(x)=b \quad(\rm or\; f(x) \rightarrow b## as ##x \rightarrow a)##
means that :
##\lim _{\|x-a\| \rightarrow 0}\|f(x)-b\|=0##
Can't we say it's equivalent to ##\lim _{x \rightarrow a}(f(x)-b)=0##
I do not understand how they got the -x in the numerator to turn into a sqrt(x) when factoring to solve this multivariable function. Could some help me understand?
To an average person with high school math knowledge how would you explain in a few words why no object could travel faster than the speed of light ?
Well it's because...
Use a graph to investigate limit of f(x) as
x→c at the number c.
Note: c is given to be 2. This number comes from the side conditions of the piecewise function.
See attachments.
lim (x + 2) as x tends to c from the left is 2.
lim x^2 as x tends to c from the right is 4.
LHL does not...
Use the graph to investigate the limit of f(x) as x tends to c at the number c.
See attachments.
Based on the graph of f(x), here is what I did:
lim (2x + 1) as x tends to 0 from the left is 1.
lim (2x) as x tends to 0 from the right is 0.
LHL does not equal RHL.
I conclude the limit of...
Use the graph to investigate
(a) lim of f(x) as x→2 from the left side.
(b) lim of f(x) as x→2 from the right side.
(c) lim of f(x) as x→2.
Question 20
For part (a), as I travel along on the x-axis coming from the left, the graph reaches a height of 4. The limit is 4. It does not matter...
Use the graph to investigate
(a) lim of f(x) as x→2 from the left side.
(b) lim of f(x) as x→2 from the right side.
(c) lim of f(x) as x→2.
Question 18
For part (a), as I travel along on the x-axis coming from the left, the graph reaches a height of 4. The limit is 4. It does not matter if...
My apologies. I posted the correct problem with the wrong set of instructions. It it a typo at my end. Here is the correct set of instructions for 28:
Use the graph to investigate limit of f(x) as x→c. If the limit does not exist, explain why.
For (a), the limit is 1.
For (b), the limit DOES...
For questions 24 and 26, Use the graph to investigate limit of f(x) as x→c. If the limit does not exist, explain why.
Question 24
For (a), the limit is 1.
For (b), the limit is cannot be determined due to the hole at (c, 2).
For (c), LHL does not = RHL.
I conclude the limit does not exist...
Investigate A Limit
Investigate the limit of f(x) as x tends to c at the given c number.
Attachment has been deleted.
Let me see.
Let c = 2
I think I got to take the limit of f(x) as x tends to 2 from the left and right. What about as x tends to 2 (from the left and right at the same...
Summary:: Graphs and Limits
Use the graph to determine the limit of the piecewise function as x tends to 1.
Let me see.
lim of (-x + 3) as x-->1 from the left is 2.
lim of (2x) as x-->1 from the right is 2.
I can safely say that the limit of f(x) as x tends to 1 from the left and right...
Summary:: Use Graph To Investigate Limit
Use the graph to investigate the limit of f(x)
as x tends to 0.
Let me see.
I got to use the graph to investigate the limit of f(x) as x tends to 0 from the left and right.
Let y = f(x).
The given function can also be expressed as f(x) = | x |.
The...
Hello everyone. How are you? I want to learn calculus so badly. I plan to do a self-study of calculus l, ll, and lll. Before thinking so far ahead, I need a clear, basic definition of the concept of a limit. Textbook language is never easy to grasp unless the student is gifted. I am not gifted...
If you are told something holds if the limit exists, and given a function f (specifically not piecewise defined), is it enough to show that the limit as x approaches c = the function evaluated at c?
With a piecewise defined function, it is easy to check both sides of a potential discontinuity...
I have the following definition:
$$ \lim_{x\to p^+}f(x)=+\infty\iff \forall\,\,\varepsilon>0,\,\exists\,\,\delta>0,\,\,\text{with}\,\,p+\delta< b: p< x < p+\delta \implies f(x) > \varepsilon$$
From this, how can I get the definition of
$$\lim_{x\to p^-}=-\infty? $$
I have the following definition:
$$\lim_{x\to p^+}f(x)=+\infty\iff \forall\,\,\varepsilon>0,\,\exists\,\,\delta>0,\,\,\text{with}\,\,p+\delta< b: p< x < p+\delta \implies f(x) > \varepsilon$$
From this, how can I get the definition of
$$\lim_{x\to p^-}=-\infty? $$
Problem: Let ## f: \Bbb R \to \Bbb R ## be continuous. It is known that ## \lim_{x \to \infty } f(x) = \lim_{x \to -\infty } f(x) = l \in R \cup \{ \pm \infty \} ##. Prove that ## f ## gets maximum or minimum on ## \Bbb R ##.
Proof: First we'll regard the case ## l = \infty ## ( the case...
Hello!
I need to calculate the limit of this function ## f(x) = (x^2-9)*e^{-x}## for + and - ## \infty ## Now for + infinity I did this
$$ \frac{(x^2-9)}{e^x} $$ apply L'Hospital since we have infinity divided by infinity; $$\frac{2x}{e^x} $$ Apply L'Hospital again $$ \frac{2}{e^x} $$ the...
Hello, I know I posted this question recently but I wanted to update with my progress. I have figured out what the limit should be but I would really appreciate help with how to use the definition of the limit of a sequence to prove it! What I have is:Suppose n is extremely large, then both...
Hello! I have been trying to work through this but I have never really been able to use the definition correctly to find a limit sequence. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Bernard Stiegler said that technology is an evolving organism that never ends as long as their are people; yet as an aspiring futurist; I feel that I’ve reached the limit to all the different concepts for technology. All the futurism stuff is repetitive because their are only so many things a...
Problem: If sequence ## (a_n) ## has ##10-10## as partial limits and in addition ##\forall n \in \mathbb{N}.|a_{n+1} − a_{n} |≤ \frac{1}{n} ##, then 0 is a partial limit of ## (a_n) ##.
Proof : Suppose that ## 0 ## isn't a partial limit of ## (a_n) ##. Then there exists ## \epsilon_0 > 0 ## and...
height from ground
speed
100
40
80
48
60
60
40
72
20
80
I tried to plot the points (speed on x-axis and height on y axis) and I got more or less like a straight line but I am not sure whether the graph would help to calculate the upper and lower limit of the time.
I also tried to...
My attempt:
\begin{align}
\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \sqrt{n^2 + n} - n &= n\sqrt{1+\frac{1}{n}} -n\\
&=n - n\\
&= 0\\
\end{align}
I think the issue is at (1)-(2)
For comparison, here is Rudin's solution
How would I determine the following limit without substitution of large values of x to see what value is approached by the complex function?
## \lim_{x \rightarrow +\infty} {\dfrac {2^{x}} {x^{2} } } ## where ## x\in \mathbb{R}##
Use the epsilon-delta method to show that the limit is 3/2 for the given function.
lim (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) = 3/2
x-->1
I want to find a delta so that | x - 1| < delta implies |f(x) - L| < epsilon.
| (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) - (3/2) | < epsilon
-epsilon < (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) - 3/2 < epsilon
I now add...
The model below is given to find the growth of a population of an endangered species.
P(t) = (500)/[1 + 82.3e^(-0.162t)]
Find the limit of P(t) as t tends to positive infinity.
The answer in the textbook is 500.
Can a model like this be graphed? If so, is the graph of P(t) the best approach...
Find the limit of (5x)/(100 - x) as x tends to 100 from the left side.
The side condition given: 0 <= x < 100
To create a table, I must select values of x slightly less than 100.
I did that and ended up with negative infinity as the answer. The textbook answer is positive infinity.
Can you...
Given u(t) = (u_0 - T)e^(kt) + T, find the limit of u(t) as t tends to 0 from the right side.
The answer is u_0. How is the answer found? Seeking a hint or two.
Can this Law of Cooling be graphed? If so, what does the graph look like?
Given u(t) = (u_0 - T)e^(kt) + T, find the limit of u(t) as t tends to positive infinity.
The answer is T. How is the answer found? Seeking a hint or two.
Find the limit of csc(2x) as x tends to pi/2 from the right side.
I decided to graph the function. Based on the graph, I stated the answer to be positive infinity.
According to the textbook, the answer is negative infinity. Why is negative infinity the right answer?
Thanks
Find the limit of cot (x) as x tends to pi from the left side.
Seeking a hint or two. Does the graph of the given function help in terms of finding the limit?
Find the limit of (1 - x)/[(3 - x)^2] as x---> 3.
I could not find the limit using algebra. So, I decided to graph the given function.
I can see from the graph on paper that the limit is negative infinity.
How is this done without graphing?
Find the limit of 1/(x^2 - 9) as x tends to -3 from the left side.
Approaching -3 from the left means that the values of x must be slightly less than -3.
I created a table for x and f(x).
x...(-4.5)...(-4)...(-3.5)
f(x)... 0.088...0.142...…...0.3076
I can see that f(x) is getting larger and...
Find the limit of 5/(x^2 - 4) as x tends to 2 from the right side.
Approaching 2 from the right means that the values of x must be slightly larger than 2.
I created a table for x and f(x).
x...2.1...2.01...2.001
f(x)...12...124.68...1249.68
I can see that f(x) is getting larger and larger...
Find the limit of (3x)/(x - 2) as x tends to 2 from the left side.
Approaching 2 from the left means that the values of x must be slightly less than 2.
I created a table for x and f(x).
x...0...0.5...1...1.5
f(x)...0...-1...-3...-9
I can see that f(x) is getting smaller and smaller and...
Find the limit of x/(x^2 - 4) as x tends to 2 from the right.
If I plug x = 0, I will get 0/-4 = asymptote. Again, is graphing the best to do this one?
I can also create a number line.
<----------(-2)----------(0)---------------(2)-------->
I can then select values for x from each interval...