I have the following book:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0072401893/?tag=pfamazon01-20
I'm currently going over symbolization and truth-functional connectives.
I have a question considering a material conditional paraphrasing.
Of course, you cannot state this backwards. If he applied for the...
This is VBA Excel:
Here is what I am trying to do. I have a MathML file saved as a .txt file. It is simialr to XML.
From the XML file, we have a bunch of text that looks something like:
<mname>Salad</mname><mrow>xyz</mrow>
I would ultimately like to have an array whose elements are the...
I've got quite an unusual hobby project and so far, after couple of nights googling, I haven't found software that would fit the bill. I've got the truth table representing what I'd like to do and can minimize & map it to gates using Logic Friday.
The problem is, I don't have NOR or NAND...
Edited Q1 + solution attempts
Homework Statement
Q1: Represent the following using only NAND gates, and only NOR gates
Q1a) A.B + ~(A.C).~(B+C)
Q1b) (A XOR B) + ~(A XOR B).(B + C)
Q2: Design a combinational logic circuit that converts a 4 bit sign magnitude representation of a number...
Sorry to have two threads up at the top of the Science Book Discussion forum, but I couldn't find a thread for this. I'm interested in learning some mathematical logic. Here are the books I'm considering, please tell me what you think of them or suggest better alternatives.
Mathematical Logic...
Jun3-03, 03:02 PM
C0mmie
"... logic is not an attribute of the universe, but instead is our means of understanding the universe, while the universe itself has nothing to do with logic. For expample, imagine a person who for the first time in his life is exposed to Heisenberg's...
Curry's paradox can be used to (dis)prove the riemann hypothesis and string theory, and even prove the (non)existence of God... no, actually, Curry's paradox IS God. :biggrin:
Just kidding... I am now (speaking somewhat hyperbolically) freaked out. Does Curry's paradox go like this (try "1 =...
Hello all
I cannot find a simple explanation of the meaning of this axiom, probably because it is considered so obvioius that it needs no explanation. Can anyone explain in words.
{a}\rightarrow{({b}\rightarrow{a})}
Thanks. Matheinste.
Homework Statement
1.Assume the language has equality and a two-place predicate symbol. Given two structures (N;<) and (R;<), find a sentence true in one structure and false in the other. Can these two structures be elementarily equivalent? Can they be isomorphic? Why or why not?
2.The...
Homework Statement
Using only AND and NAND gates, design a circuit in which 4 switches must all be turned on before a switch in another circuit turns off.
i think half the reason i don't understand may be the wording of his question, i know the tables but i am not sure how the logic gates...
I'm teaching myself modal logic, and I'm curious about the following exercise, taken from this book...
Homework Statement
Prove T:\; \Box A \rightarrow A using the following rules:
Homework Equations
Given the structure M=<W,R,P> in which W and P are as they are in a model, and R...
Homework Statement
You ask your friend if the football is on 9pm or 10pm. He sometimes tells the truth and sometimes doesn't. What should you ask him so that you will be certain which time the football will be on?
The Attempt at a Solution
ASK: Is it true that 'You are telling the truth...
Hi,
I've been trying to work out the formula for the sum for the full adder logic, however have come across a gap which I don't know how to fill.
S = (¬A.¬B.C) + (¬A.B.¬C) + (A.¬B.¬C) + (A.B.C)
S = ¬A.(¬B.C + B.¬C) + A.(¬B.¬C)
S = ¬A.(B \oplus C) + A.( do not know what to do at this point to...
Homework Statement
Prove or disprove:
"If you can prove ( y \wedge \neg c ) \rightarrow Contradiction , then
y \rightarrow c must be right."Homework Equations
My teacher used the sign \wedge , instead of \vee , like:
"If ( a \wedge b \wedge \neg c ) \rightarrow Contradiction , then...
how could i express using only the operator NOR (in logic) the rest of operation NOT(x) AND(x,y) OR(x,y) that is how i could prove that the Logic operator NOR is functionally complete
Hi, all.
Wikipedia says:
In logic, the law of the excluded middle states that the propositional calculus formula "P ∨ ¬P" ("P or not-P") can be deduced from the calculus under investigation. It is one of the defining properties of classical systems of logic. However, some systems of logic...
Homework Statement
I am supposed to prove that if you have a puzzle 8 in this configuration
A B C
D E F
H G
I have to prove that no matter how many moves you make (as you
would a normal puzzle moving one of the adjacent...
Helloo every one,
here is my qusetion:
Design acircuit that has three inputs a,b,c and has three outputs a' ,b', c' . your circuit can only have two inverters and any number of AND and OR gates
if some 1 could help me i'd appreciate it.
Can I use this logic?
Homework Statement
I'm wondering if I can use this kind of logic to solve:
\sum\frac{(n+1)^n}{n^{(n+1)}} Converges or diverges
The Attempt at a Solution
\frac{(n+1)^n}{n^{(n+1)}} \geq \frac{(n)^n}{n^{(n+1)}}
And
\frac{(n)^n}{n^{(n+1)}} = n ...
Homework Statement
I'm studying logic gates and trying to create my first one.
Homework Equations
3. In a TV programme, the panel votes on new performers.
The panel consists of a Chairman (C) and three others (X, Y and Z) who each press a button to register their vote.
The SUCCESS light is...
Hi. So a classic logic puzzle goes like this:
At noon the hour, minute, and second hands coincide. In about one hour and five minutes the minute and hour hands will coincide again.
What is the exact time (to the millisecond) when this occurs.
(Assume that the clock hands move continuously.) If...
Probably a very simple answer here...
I'm creating a logic circuit using only NAND gates. I have 4 inputs, A B C and D, but I am just using a single 'path'/part of the equation for this question, that being A'B = F, F being the output.
Full equation...
AB'C + AB'D' + A'B + A'C = F
F...
Can someone tell me what order someone should learn physics until they can say that they totally know physics (please don't write something like you can never learn everything in physics)
Thanks!
Hi,
I am helping my children with a computer game based on Logic and Reasoning. The player has to solve different puzzles as the game progresses. I am struggling with a matching puzzle where the player has to form a string of the game characters based on their traits. Please see the attached...
Homework Statement
(p -> q) has an unambiguous meaning both in logic and in natural language. The DeMorgans laws tell us what is meant by the negation of a conjunction or the negation of a disjunction, but what is the negation of a conditional such as p -> q? Use the rules of logic to produce...
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/3070/11650282.th.gif
on the limsup case
each time we take out the biggest member of the sequence .
so it goes to the smallest memeber
how its supposed to be the supremum of the limits
Homework Statement
Here are a few questions from an exercise sheet that I need help on. I really don't have a clue on how to start them. Could anyone help me attempt at each a) for each question?
1. Use (nested) quantifiers (∀ and ∃) (and propositional junctors) and only equality ``=''...
I have been trying to study first-order logic to have a sound basis on mathematical language. The main target is to have a clear path: I start with first-order logic (the language), then I go and study set theory, which is in fact a series of axioms (ie, a series of statements of the language)...
W_1 and W_ 2 are subspaces of V of inner product V.
prove that if
W_1\subseteq W_2
then
W_1^\perp \supseteq W_2^\perp
the proof is:
we take v\epsilon W_1
so <v,w>=0 for every w\epsilon W_1^\perp
and because
W_2^\perp \subseteq W_1^\perp
(i can't see why the "viven expression is...
Is it equivalent?
( \forall x \in S \forall y P(x) ) <=> \neg ( \exists x \in S^{c} \exists y \neg P(x) )
Attempt at solution
I think it should be
( \forall x \in S \forall y P(x) ) <=> \neg ( \exists x \in S \exists y \neg P(x) )
The diiference to the above statement is S^{c}.
Homework Statement
\forall x \in S <-> \exists x \not \in S
The Attempt at a Solution
The statement is clearly false.
I will try to show that by the proof of contradiction.
Let
P: \forall x \in S
and
Q: \exists x \not\in S
The negation of Q is
negQ: \forall x \not\in S
and the negation...
Homework Statement
Let u and v be two nonzero vectors in R^2. If there is no c E R such that u = cv, show that {u, Bv} is a basis of R^2 and that R^2 is a direct sum of the subspaces generated by U = <u> and V = <v> respectively.
Homework Equations
Clearly, u and v are linearly...
Hi,
I'm trying to build a digital circuit that will perform one of three logic functions on a set of three inputs A B C based on the input value of a counter that counts mod-3 (00, 01, 10).
I can use basic chips such as mux, demux, 555 timer, logical chips
Thanks
1. Negate the following statements
(i): \forallx\inR \existsy\inR such that x+y=0
(ii): introduction: Each of us got, let's say, 20 bags of green apples.
Actual Statement: At least one of us (each) found at least one red apple in at least one bag (each). (Each person and each one of it's...
I'm trying to pick my last elective. My others are PDEs. What's a Logic I course like? I'm considering this one course/professor, and he has good reviews on ratemyprofessor for this course.
Honestly, I have no clue how to answer this question. A professor sent this out in a email, but I don't have a class with her so I don't think its homework. Care to throw some ideas? Is it really simple...? Apparently its a logic question, but it seems illogical to me.
"A mathematician is...
I cannot find any sort of comprehensive list of top schools in mathematical logic. It seems that U Wisconsin should be good, though I don't know if that is the case now that Barwise has passed. UC Berkeley is clearly a good school for logic. All of the places that show up are in Europe. I would...
I'm trying to find a good book on Symbolic, Pure, Mathematical Logic. Anyone know such a book? I'd prefer it have no mention to number theory, set theory, etc. since I have books on those already and I find that they detract value from the books since it's just less time spent on the main topics.
I am more precisely looking for a book on mathematical logic which presupposes only minimal exposure to set theory. Preferably something which includes an introductory chapter delineating relevant set theoretic principals.
I am familiar with only basic set theory. More precisely this means...
I am looking to make a career shift.
I am looking for a career track with the following characteristics:
1) Heavy use (and need to learn) advanced mathematical concepts (especially symbolic in nature). I want to be working with equations and logic in a symbolic manner on a daily basis.
2) A...
Hey everyone,
Thanks for the help in advance. I am having trouble deriving a tautology from no premises.
I am trying to derive:
(X <-> Y) v (X <-> -Y) "-" meaning not.
However, I keep getting stuck. It seems very similar to the Law of the Excluded Middle but I am having trouble...
Show
\sum_1^\infty\frac{x^n}{1+x^n} converges when x is in [0,1)
\sum_1^\infty\frac{x^n}{1+x^n} = \sum_1^\infty\frac{1}{1+x^n} * x^n <= \sum_1^\infty\frac{1}{1} * x^n = \sum_1^\infty x^n
The last sum is g-series, converges since r = x < 1
Homework Statement
Using k-map simplify the boolean function:
f(w, x, y, z) = \prod(1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 15)
into sum of products form
product of sums form
implement using nand gates
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
I have the k-map, I understand that...
Homework Statement
Here is an image of the problem (Write the circuit in min SOP form.) http://img211.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ddtl0.jpg
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
I've looked at it and gone over notes but I don't get it. If you would like I can scan my...
Show that the following argument is valid in SD.
(I will use "⊃" to show conditional.)
(E v (L v M)) & (E ≡ F)
L ⊃ D
D ⊃ ~ L
----------------------
E v M
I'm only allowed to use the basic derivation rules of SD:
Reiteration (R)
Conjunction Intro. (&I) and Conjunction Elim. (&E)...
The question is:
Show that the following derivability claim holds in SD.
(I'll use ">" to stand in for conditional.)
{(A > F) & (F > D), ((M v H) v C) > A, ~(M v H) & C} entails D
I'm only allowed to use the basic derivation rules of SD:
Reiteration (R)
Conjunction Intro. (&I) and...