In Newtonian mechanics, linear momentum, translational momentum, or simply momentum (pl. momenta) is the product of the mass and velocity of an object. It is a vector quantity, possessing a magnitude and a direction. If m is an object's mass and v is its velocity (also a vector quantity), then the object's momentum is
p
=
m
v
.
{\displaystyle \mathbf {p} =m\mathbf {v} .}
In SI units, momentum is measured in kilogram meters per second (kg⋅m/s).
Newton's second law of motion states that the rate of change of a body's momentum is equal to the net force acting on it. Momentum depends on the frame of reference, but in any inertial frame it is a conserved quantity, meaning that if a closed system is not affected by external forces, its total linear momentum does not change. Momentum is also conserved in special relativity (with a modified formula) and, in a modified form, in electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, and general relativity. It is an expression of one of the fundamental symmetries of space and time: translational symmetry.
Advanced formulations of classical mechanics, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, allow one to choose coordinate systems that incorporate symmetries and constraints. In these systems the conserved quantity is generalized momentum, and in general this is different from the kinetic momentum defined above. The concept of generalized momentum is carried over into quantum mechanics, where it becomes an operator on a wave function. The momentum and position operators are related by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
In continuous systems such as electromagnetic fields, fluid dynamics and deformable bodies, a momentum density can be defined, and a continuum version of the conservation of momentum leads to equations such as the Navier–Stokes equations for fluids or the Cauchy momentum equation for deformable solids or fluids.
Maybe a silly question but on the above question using the conservation of momentum:
momentum before firing (0) = momentum after firing (55*35)+(M*2.5)
If I re-range the above it's M = -(55*35)/2.5 = -770kg. I can I reconcile that minus sign (basically get rid of it)?
Thanks
Hello! If we have a transition between 2 ro-vibrational levels of the same electronic state of a diatomic molecule the selection rules require for the changes in the rotational quantum number J that ##\Delta J = \pm 1##. Why can't we have ##\Delta J = 0##? The photon carries one unit of angular...
I know that the eigenstates of momentum operator are given by exp(ikx)
To construct a real-valued and normalized wavefunction out of these eigenstates,
I have,
psi(x) = [exp(ikx) + exp(-ikx)]/ sqrt(2)
But my trouble is, how do I find the expectation value of momentum operator <p> using this...
Hello everybody at the forum
I'm from Ukraine, I have Chemistry degree, and last year I began to self studying Quantum Mechanics.
I'm reading this article:
R. Garcia, A. Zozulya, and J. Stickney, “MATLAB codes for teaching quantum physics: Part 1,” [Online]. Available...
1. Hello, so the difficulty I am having with this problem is that is seems relatively straightforward. I have tried to solving it by assuming that this is a collision in which momentum is conserved. Therefore, I found the total momentum before the collision and used this to resolve it must be...
I try to use relativistic energy equation:
$$E'=\gamma mc^2$$
But, I use
$$\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(1-(\frac{v'}{c})^2}}$$
then I use Lorentz velocity transformation.
$$v'=\frac{v-u}{1-\frac{uv}{c^2}}$$
At the end, I end up with messy equation for E' but still have light speed c in the terms. How...
Textbook solution:
##v## is the instantaneous velocity,
$$P(t)=(M+b t) v$$
Then $$impulse = \Delta P = (M+b t) v = \int^{t}_{0} F dt'$$
Thus $$v=\frac{F t}{(M + bt)}$$
What I did instead was:
Let ##M## be the instantaneous mass, and ##M_0## be the initial mass, then $$M=M_{0} + b t$$...
For the sake of this question, I am primarily concerned with the position wave function. So, from my understanding, the wave function seems to 'collapse' to a few states apon measurement. We know this because, if the same particle is measured again shortly after this, it will generally remain in...
Hello! I just started reading some molecular physics and I am a bit confused about the electron angular momentum in diatomic molecules. Let's say we have just 2 protons and an electron for simplicity and we are in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, so we assume that the nuclei are fixed in...
Take for example earth. Earth has angular momentum about its own axis. However, if we ignore the orbital portion, the angular momentum of the Earth relative to the sun's axis is the same.
Another example is the spinning bike wheel/person holding it in a chair. It has angular momentum about its...
I have trouble solving this problem any help would be appreciated.Problem statement
##J=\frac{mr^2}{2}##
a) Determine the motion of yoyos for ##n=1,2,3##
The case for ##n=1## is simple, however, I am having trouble with ##n=2## and ##n=3##.
for ##n=2## I started by drawing all the forces...
Unfortunately, I couldn't arrive to the correct answer ($$=0.28mL^2 \omega^2$$ ) and will be happy to understand what am I doing wrong.
**My attempt:**
Using $$
E_k = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2
$$
I obtain that the difference I need to calculate is
$$
\frac{1}{2} (2mL^2)(0.8\omega)^2 +...
In the classic example of a person holding a spinning bike wheel, as they flip the wheel over, angular momentum is conserved by the person/chair spinning with 2x the angular momentum of the initial wheel. Not questioning that.
However, I thought ang momentum is always conserved about a...
Why, in lagrangian mechanics, do we calculate: ##\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot{q}}## to get the (generalised) momentum change in time
instead of ##\frac{d T}{dq}##?
(T - kinetic energy; q - generalised coordinate; p - generalised momentum; for simplicity I assumed that no external...
I honeslty don't quite know how to start. It seems like the Hooke's coefficent k is independent of the answer to this problem.
I would also appreciate any clue of expressing the condition when "balls will collide again". The fact that all balls can keep moving make this rather difficult.
It...
L = mvr = mr (dr/dt) = 2m*r*(dr/dt)/2 = 2m*(dA/dt)
So, A = (L/2m)T
so, ## L = \frac{2 \pi a b m}{T}##
Now, ##T^2 = \frac{4 \pi^2}{GM} a^3##
So from all these, I get
##L = \sqrt{ \frac{GM m^2 b^2}{a}}##
But answer given is
##L = \sqrt{ \frac{2GM m^2 ab}{a+b}}##
(This, they have derived from...
A stationary observer sees a particle moving north at velocity v very close to the speed of light. Then the observer accelerates eastward to velocity v. What is its new total velocity of the particle toward the north-west relative to the observer?
I ask because while the particles total...
Question 7.6
Official solution
It seems that the solution uses the conservation of angular momentum to solve this question (τ=0). But the problem is that the frame is set on the centre of mass of the guy, which is non inertial. I would like to know why it is correct to do it this way. My...
I don't understand the reasoning of this question's answer. The answer is velocity = 0 (option A).
A while ago, I was told that, since the magnets were held at-rest (before being let go), they must have no velocity after the collision. What about the velocity which they had just before the...
So I've managed to confuse myself on this problem :)
Since the problem says we can assume ##m_p << m_b##, I'm assuming that the velocity of the bowling ball will be unchanged, such that ##\vec v_{b,i} = \vec v_{b,f} = -v_{b,0} \hat i##
I started out using the energy-momentum principle, ##(\vec...
List of relevant equations:
Angular Momentum = L (vector) = r(vector) x p(vector)
Angular velocity of rotating object = w(vector), direction found using right hand rule. Torque = T(vector) = dL(vector)/dt
I have a few questions about torque and angular momentum direction and...
Question: If we place the frame of reference on an accelerating point, does the total rotational momentum still remain the same?
I attempted to solve this question by manipulating the equations as shown below.
$$\text{Define that }\vec r_i=\vec R+\vec r_i'\text{, where r is the position vector...
First I calculated the momentum of m1. Since m2 was at rest after the collision, all its momentum was transferred, so m1 has a momentum of 158 i hat.
L=r x p, so its 916 k hat. This would also be the change in L because it was initially 0 when m1 had no velocity, so I know this is the net...
First I found the moment of inertia,
I=1.8(5.5^2+3.9^2+4.9^2)
=125.046
Then I tried to find the rotation rate using the equation L=rotation rate*I
rotation rate=3773/125.046=30.173
But the answer is suppose to be 21.263?
I know how to get to the answer but that's what is confusing me.
To find final velocity I multiply the acceleration by the time the object fell.
Then multiply the velocity by the mass to get momentum.
Now the angular momentum is r x p.
Since the initial angular momentum was 0, this was also...
So I first tried to find L using torque,
Torque=d/dt*L, and took the integral of this.
Ended up with 23.28484t
Now I square the equation L=rotation rate*I to get L^2=rotation acceleration *I^2
Angular acceleration=L^2/I^2
I feel like I am doing something wrong though, this doesn't give the...
m1v1+m2v2=m1vs'+m2v2' , if car hits small fluffy object m2, initially v2=0, and v1'=v2' ... so
m1v1=[m1+m2](v2')
but why not energy? Why is there a KElost?
.5m1v1^2+.5m2v2^2=.5m1v1'^2+.5m2v'2^2 +KElost , and again v2=0, v1'=v2'
.5m1v1^2=.5[m1+m2]v2'^2+KElost
using consv of momentum...
So to cut to the chase, I missed my class' lesson on momentum - have tried to catch up, quite successfully but am baffled about this question. I know the conservation of momentum etc. but after trying for ages it's just not happening this question so any help would be much appreciated,
Oscar.
Please scroll-sown to Question 52: https://www.undergraduate.study.cam.ac.uk/files/publications/engineering_s1_qp_2017.pdf
The correct answer is 'B'. This is the working I did:
F = (change in momentum) / (change in time)
change in momentum = mv - mu, where v = final velocity and u = initial...
So we know that the initial intertia of the merry go round is 250 kg m^2 and its angular speed is 10 rpm. MGRs angular momentum would be L=Iw=250(10)=2500kg m^2 rpm.
We know the mass if the child is 25kg, and the child's linear velocity is 6m/s. We convert linear to angular w= v/r = 6/2 =...
Hi, I have the following problem:
A homogeneous disc with M = 1.78 kg and R = 0.547 m is lying down at rest on a perfectly polished surface. The disc is kept in place by an axis O although it can turn freely around it.
A particle with m = 0.311 kg and v = 103 m/s, normal to the disc's surface at...
I know that the force must be a central force and that under central forces, angular momentum is conserved. But I am unable to mathematically show if the angular and linear momentum are constants.
Radial Momentum
##p=m\dot r = ma\dot \theta=ma\omega##
Angular Momentum
##L=mr^2\dot\theta =...
Let's say you start 2 rockets in the opposite direction from a platform that's close to two soon to be merging black holes, the first rocket starts way before the second, but the second will ultimately fly a bit further, before they stop and fly back to towards the black hole(s). When black...
We want to show that ##[\hat{ \vec H}, \hat{ \vec L}_T]=0##. I made a guess: we know that ##[\hat{ \vec H}, \hat{ \vec L}_T]=[\hat{ \vec H}, \hat{ \vec L}] + \frac 1 2 [\hat{ \vec H}, \vec \sigma]=0## must hold.
I have already shown that
$$[\hat{ \vec H}, -i \vec r \times \vec \nabla]= -...
I'm sure I've read somewhere that Jupiter has 99% of the solar system's angular momentum, which shouldn't be the case.
However, I can't find a source for this, and any search online for the topic doesn't bring up any science sites.
Did I mis-remember?
I am wondering why heavier bullets have a higher momentum than lighter bullets when using similar powder charges?
At the muzzle, a typical 150 grain bullet fired from a 30-'06 will travel at around 3000 ft/s.
A 200 grain bullet from the same rifle will travel around 2600 ft/s.
(The velocities...
1. When an object attached to a fixed point with a string, is given a velocity and the string goes taut.
So it says in this book (Applied Mathematics 1 by L. Bostock and S. Chandler) that when the string goes taut, the component of the velocity of the particle becomes zero in the direction...
I am confused with the following two questions:
1. A particle moves under the influence of a central force directed toward a fixed origin ##O##. Explain why the particle's angular momentum about ##O## is constant.
2. Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's...
A particle of mass m has kinetic energy E when it collides with a stationary particle of mass M. The two particles coalesce. Which of the following expressions gives the total kinetic energy transferred to other forms of energy in the collision?
I keep getting C as my answer when the correct...
Hi All,
I'm trying to get a better understanding of the momentum thrust given by an over-expanded rocket nozzle (I realize this case voids the isentropic flow assumption used for the 1D isentropic gas expansion equations typically used for rocket engine design since the normal shock is not an...
I think I get the approach. We first need to evaluate the term ##\dot A_{\mu} \nabla A^{\mu}## and then evaluate the 3D space integral; we may need to take the limit ##V \rightarrow \infty## (i.e ##\sum_{\vec k} (2 \pi)^3/V \rightarrow \int d^3 \vec k##) at some point.
The mode expansions of...
Wikipedia says that they are the equivalents of momentum and force in rotational motion but I don't understand why this comparison is possible. The torque's dimension is N*m it seems like energy. What is this energy? Why angular momentum is not mass times angular velocity?