In particle physics, the history of quantum field theory starts with its creation by Paul Dirac, when he attempted to quantize the electromagnetic field in the late 1920s. Major advances in the theory were made in the 1940s and 1950s, and led to the introduction of renormalized quantum electrodynamics (QED). QED was so successful and accurately predictive that efforts were made to apply the same basic concepts for the other forces of nature. By the late 1970s, these efforts successfully utilized gauge theory in the strong nuclear force and weak nuclear force, producing the modern standard model of particle physics.
Efforts to describe gravity using the same techniques have, to date, failed. The study of quantum field theory is still flourishing, as are applications of its methods to many physical problems. It remains one of the most vital areas of theoretical physics today, providing a common language to several different branches of physics.
Im still in 2year college, and studyin QM alone, would like to know a good book for QFT that I can understand. I have some questions that seems can only be answered with QFT, right now, I am half way through the Griffith's QM book..!
thx a lot guys..!
I understand that the formal structure of QFT has resisted axiomatization (so far) and that what formal structure presently exists is really a set of recipes. Can somebody outline the recipe please.
Hi
In Halzen's "Quarks & Leptons" all discussed particle interactions conserve particle number in some sense (Actually particle number is not conserved but if you count the particles minus the antiparticles before the reaction you get the same "particles minus the antiparticles" number after...
Question concerns the existence of the interaction in boost operator in the instant form of relativistic dynamics.
(referring to "Relativistic quantum dynamics" after E.V.Stefanovich, http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0504062)
From the existence of interactions in boosts (e.g., in instant form...
Hello,
I plan on continuing to study physics, mathematics and Earth science. (independently) What are the mathematical pre-requisites for learning relativistic quantum field theory as smoothly as possible. On MIT's opencourseware, it indicates that a class on advanced ODEs is enough, but we...
Hi,
I was going through section 9.2 of Peskin and Schroeder, and came across equation 9.16 which reads
\int\mathcal{D}\phi(x) = \int \mathcal{D}\phi_{1}({{\bf{x}}}) = \int \mathcal{D}\phi_{2}({{\bf{x}}}\)int_{\phi(x_{1}^{0},{\bf{x}})\\\phi(x_{1}^{0},{\bf{x}})}\mathcal{D}\phi(x)
What does the...
Can anybody recommend a good introduction to QFT book? I'm looking for something that just barely classifies as a textbook, with lots of tutorial verbiage between the equations. Thanks in advance.
I have a question in Srednicki's book regarding path integrals, but first I'll set it up so that no familiarity of the book is required to answer the question.
The vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude for the photon field in the presence of a source is given by: <0|0>_J=\int \mathcal D A...
**********************
Hi,
I did some searching and found quite some questions about the Srednicki book on QFT, so apparently there are more people working with it. I thought maybe it would be a nice idea to have some sort of "questions about QFT encountered while reading Srednicki's...
Hi,
Is it meaningful to inquire about the classical limit of a quantum field theory? Specifically, is it possible to formally recover NRQM and RQM from quantum field theory? I am told this is a wrong/ill-posed question, so I wanted to get a clearer idea about it...after all, in a QM course...
According to Steven Weinberg ('The quantum theory of fields', vol.1), the principle of gauge invariance stems from the fact, that one cannot build the 4-vector field from the creation/annihilation operators of massless bosons with spin >= 1.
This '4-vector field' ('vector potential'), if we...
Hi,
In Lewis Ryder's QFT book on page 160, the propagator for the case when the Lagrangian can be written as
L = \frac{p^2}{2m} + V(q)
is given as
\langle q_f t_f|q_i t_i \rangle = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\frac{m}{i\hbar\tau}\right)^{(n+1)/2}\int...
Has anyone read the book (at least the first volume) by Eberhard Zeidler called "Quantum Field Theory: A Bridge Between Mathematicians and Physicists"? I started reading it last year and thought it was amazing. It's so ambitiously comprehensive! But no-one ever mentions it, and it's not in...
Are there any attempts to synthesize between these two theories?
I mean are there methods from QFT being used in QC and vice versa?
I asked one professor from my univ if I were to research under his belt in QC, would I need some QFT knowledge and he said not. So I wonder are they really...
What is the general rule behind why for any given lagrangian (QED/QCD show this) that any vectors or tensors contract indices? I know it must be something simple, but I just can't think of it offhand.
QED :
F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}
Proca (massive vector):
A_\mu A^\mu
QCD :
G^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu}...
hi all,
i have a question regarding page 81 in Srednicki's QFT book. He states there that the sum over all connected diagrams with a single source is zero. Then he says that if you replace this single source by an arbitrary subdiagram the sum will still be zero. Can somebody explain why this...
The historic roots of string theory are in an explanation of the strong force. Nowadays QCD is the accepted theory of strong force. But having heard several lectures on the large N limit (SU(N)) of gauge theories it seems these theories start to looklike string theories in this limit. I believe...
Hello all
Since there seems that quite many here have followed Professor Srednickis QFT book, I want to ask a couple of question I have from his chapter on Supersymmetry.
i) on page 617 he defines the kinetic term of the Chiral Superfields as:
L_{\text{kin}} = \Phi^{\dagger} \exp(-2gV)...
Hi all,
I'm trying to teach myself the basics of QFT. I'm using Peskin and Schroeder, and having a few difficulties reproducing a couple of the calculations. I don't think I've made careless algebraic slips, so before I show my working explicitly and beg for proof-reading I'd like to ask a...
Does fact that QFT in imaginary time is equivalent to QSP represents the proof that many-particle quantum physics is equivalent to quantum theory of fields?
To elaborate a little, I had some discussion with some engineers, and when I was explaining them Standard Model I had to invoke concepts...
Consider the SUSY charge
Q= \int d^3y~ \sigma^\mu \chi~ ~\partial_\mu \phi^\dagger~
The SUSY transformation of fields, let's say of the scalar field, can be found using the commutator
i [ \epsilon \cdot Q, \phi(x)] = \delta \phi(x)
using the equal time commutator...
I have a question about the dimensions of quantum fields. In natural units, the dimensions of bosonic fields (both scalar and vector) is 1. The dimension of spin=1/2 fermion fields is 3/2. This is all very good, but I have never read any explanation anywhere why we cannot have other types of...
When quantizing boson fields, ghosts and gauge-fixing terms seem to break gauge invariance. The unitary gauge (where there are no ghosts or gauge-fixing terms) respects gauge invariance however. So which is correct - is the Standard Model a gauge theory or not?
Sometimes I hear people speak...
Homework Statement
When calculating this commutator,
[ \pi(x), \int d^3x' { \frac{1}{2} \pi^2(x') + \frac{1}{2} \phi(x')(-\nabla^2 + m^2) \phi(x') }]
I almost get the right answer, but not sure if this is valid, or if there is an identity
The Attempt at a Solution
when I get to this...
I do a regular check through the new papers on arxiv and today I came across this
http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3176
which is a continuation of a paper which Peter Morgan published in the Journal of Mathematical Physics a couple of years ago.
http://arXiv.org/abs/0704.3420
This is not something I...
Hello, as a new student of OFT and theoretical particle physics, I thought there might be good to create a thread where discussion on "Problems and solutions"-books in QFT are devoted.
There is already discussion going on about "which book is best for QFT" and also thread where McMahons book...
If a Lagrangian has some symmetry leaving the action invariant, we can introduce the corrsponding currents and charges. Now, the transformation can also be implemented as a unitary transformation of the fields in the form (let's consider a scalar field)
\phi \rightarrow \phi' = U \phi...
Homework Statement
Verify that (2.16) follows from (2.14). Here \Lambda is a Lorentz transformation matrix, U is a unitary operator, M is a generator of the Lorentz group.
Homework Equations
2.8: \delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}=-\delta\omega_{\sigma\rho}
M^{\mu\nu}=-M^{\nu\mu}
2.14...
I need someone to point me towards an instance of a relatively simple QFT problem which illustrates what can be calculated from QFT, how it is calculated, and its physical significance. (Note the qualification "relative". I realize there are likely no simple problems in QFT.)
If someone...
I don't have the time now to study QFT in depth but I need some basic knowledge about QED and quantum forces (like casimir). I want to study the role of casimir force to solid state devices (photonic and plasmonic devices).
Which part of QFT is needed to study for now and which books are...
QFT Peskin p.30 eqn 2.54
Homework Statement
i am perplexed with eqn 2.54 peskins introductory qft. just can't make out how to arrive at it from the previous step. i think that there are dirac delta funtions involved but simply can't make it out. can somebody help? provide some hint? thanks...
Homework Statement
Hi
I was trying to get the expression for H ,eqn 2.31 on page 21 peskins introductory QFT
Homework Equations
I get the final expression only if a^+_{-p}\ a_{-p} = a^+_{p}\ a_{p}
so pls tell me if a^+_{-p}\ a_{-p} = a^+_{p}\ a_{p}
(+ stands for dagger) thanks in advance
As suggested by Marcus, I have read the whole paper and decided to start a discussion of Kober's paper by asking a few questions.
The paper certaintly presents a very interesting view. Part of it is an extension of Heisenberg's work on unified QFT, that the mass originates from self-interaction...
It is often stated that the transition amplitude between eigenstates of the free-field Hamiltonian H_0 is encoded by the S-matrix, defined by
\langle \mathrm{f} | U{_\mathrm{I}} (\infty,-\infty)|\mathrm{i} \rangle.
where U_{\mathrm{I}} is the time-evolution operator in the interaction...
...like in Photon-Photon-scattering. I know this doesn't make sense physically but the value for the diagram should still be computeable. If I want to put the expression for the matrix element together, I get a matrix, but it should be a scalar, right? Since the spinor bi-product is missing...
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post a graduate level course material,
but I have a question about perturbative expansion of the 2n-point function of a scalar field theory.
Homework Statement
First, the question:
In which space (position or momentum) is the topological distinctness...
QFT it is possible to calculate the energy density of empty space.
It is known to be around 10^50 orders to large.
Does the calculated large cosmological constant in falsify QFT?
Or does GR have to be re-done with a higher energy density
Can conservation of momentum be directly derived from quantum field theory (e.g. QED).
My feeling is this should be true since the Dirac equation reduces to Schrodinger's wave equation in the nonrelativistic limit which is a reflection of Newton's second law, thereby implying conservation of...
I am starting to learn QFT and I am scanning my text (Mandl and Shaw) for the highlights. Would some please confirm whether these are the highlights.
(1) The states are Fock states where the states are distinguished by occupation numbers for various single particle or single photon states...
I've been thinking about one of the postulates about one particle quantum mechanics, it says that whenever we measure an energy value, we get one of those eigenvalues.
Firstly, pretty much 99% of the stuffs I know in nonrelativistic QM applies in the realm of electromagnetism. I just don't...
if we consider the propagators and other Fourier integrals in the sense of 'distribution' then are all the divergences that appear in QFT (quantum field theory) due to the divergent quantities
\delta ^{k} (0)
that is my idea, all the divergences appear because in the commutation...
Hello Forum
Does anybody know of a good summary article or webpage that concisely and accurately outlines QFT (wikipedia's page is pretty bad)? I am not looking for a layman's guide but rather something suitable for a soon-to-be-student of QFT - something that can be read and understood in a...
It would be nice if someone commented a couple of propositions by Peskin and Schroeder in their QFT book in p.166.
There they say that when the helicity is conserved in the high energy Compton scattering, one unit of spin angular momentum is converted to one unit of orbital angular momentum...
I am having some great difficulty getting intuition out of the standard quantization of the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian.
consider the H operator. In QM, the expectation values for H in any eigenstates |n> is just
<n|H|n>
now, in QFT, suppose I have a state |p> in the universe, what do I get if I...
Hiya,
just stumbled upon this forum searching out 'Peskin errata' when trying to figure out a simple QFT calculation in the textbook. Apparently, there is no mention of the simple derivation that I'm struggling with, so there must be something wrong with my own working. I would really...
Hi, I'm studying QFT (quantum field theory) again, with the help of Peskin&Schroeder. Altough the book is much better to read for a second time, there are some things that keep me wondering.
It's about shifting physical quantities by a small imaginary constant in order to be sure that...
According to the https://www.amazon.com/review/product/0521864496/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_img?_encoding=UTF8&showViewpoints=1"&tag=pfamazon01-20 on Amazon, it's pretty good.
Download it http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html".