In mathematics and logic, a theorem is a non-self-evident statement that has been proven to be true, either on the basis of generally accepted statements such as axioms or on the basis of previously established statements such as other theorems. A theorem is hence a logical consequence of the axioms, with a proof of the theorem being a logical argument which establishes its truth through the inference rules of a deductive system. As a result, the proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific law, which is experimental.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements, whose proofs deduce conclusions from conditions known as hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses. Namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true—without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could also be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol (e.g., non-classical logic).
Although theorems can be written in a completely symbolic form (e.g., as propositions in propositional calculus), they are often expressed informally in a natural language such as English for better readability. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed.
In addition to the better readability, informal arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, one might even be able to substantiate a theorem by using a picture as its proof.
Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being "trivial", or "difficult", or "deep", or even "beautiful". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time and culture: for example, as a proof is obtained, simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be stated simply, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
I know that for rigid bodies only the work-energy theorem states that the net work done on the body equals the change in kinetic energy of the body since a rigid body has no internal degrees of freedom and hence no other forms of energy such as potential energy. Is there a most generalized form...
Homework Statement
Homework Equations
Parallel axis theorem: Ip = Icm + Md^2
Icm = I = ML²/12 + 2 * mr²
3. The attempt
Ip = Icm + Md^2 ==> wrong
I = Md^2 ==> right
Why don't I need to add "Icm"?
Thanks.
Hello everyone. I need help on proofs. I have to proof the Angle-Angle-Side theorem. Can someone help me with this?
The AAS states : If triangles ABC and DEF are two triangles such that angle ABC is congruent to angle DEF, angle BCA is congruent to angle EFD, and segment AC is congruent to DF...
Homework Statement
I need to accommodate a dashpot in an intentionally simple work-kinetic energy analysis method. For example, for a box being dragged up a ramp via a rope while attached to a spring, I can deal with the work done by gravity, rope tension, spring force, and friction via the...
Hello everyone,
I am trying to find a proof for:
\[\vdash \left ( \sim \alpha \rightarrow \sim \left ( \sim \alpha \right ) \right )\rightarrow \alpha\]
I am using the L inference system, which includes the modus ponens inference rule, and the axioms and statements attached below. That's the...
Hi
I need a little help in my homework. It is not a direct problem to be solved. Rather I am supposed to find an application of Noether's theorem. All the article or papers I have found are very difficult for me to understand. In fact, I still don't understand any application of Noether's...
Homework Statement
Use the Intermediate Value Theorem to prove that any continuous function with domain [0,1] and range in [0,1] must have a fixed point.
Homework Equations
Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) states that if a function ##f(x)## of domain [##a,b##] takes values ##f(a)## and...
Hi, I wonder why wronskian must be constant.
I know that p(x)W[u1(x),u2(x)]=constant, according to the Abel's theorem, but
wouldnt there a special case that W[u1(x),u2(x)]=c/p(x).
Then for this special case, W[u1(x),u2(x)]=/=c and satisfies Abel's theorem.
Is it ok to ignore this special case?
I'm curious if anyone has ever simulated the infinite monkeys on typewriters using a computer, and managed to generate short sentences or phrases that have appeared in books/print media before.
That would demonstrate the effectiveness of the infinite monkey theorem.
Hi All,
I would like to know if is there any problem to present and prove a theorem and a Lemma (in this order) and after that use this theorem and this lemma to prove a corollary (which is simpler to prove and not so important as the theorem).
I have looked up in some papers but with no...
I have been curious for some time, does the incompleteness theorem of mathematics have any consequences in physics? In order that I may understand your response you should know I'm was a senior math major at the university when last I was in school and my only physics background is the standard...
Hello,I had a discussion with my professor. He tried to convince me but I couldn't understand the idea.
The Stokes Theorem (Curl Theorem) is the following:
My professor says that the value of the equation should be zero whenever the area of integration is closed! (which will make a volume in...
Homework Statement
An employee goes to work from 9 am to 4 pm. He takes a nap for an average of 2 hours if he starts napping before 1 pm and naps for an average of 1 hours if he starts napping after 1 pm. His boss randomly checks up on him once during his shift. If his boss finds him napping...
I was looking at the proof of Lagrange's theorem (that the order of a group ##G## is a multiple of the order of any given subgroup ##H##) in Wikipedia:
I understand this proof fine, but I was wondering, instead of finding a bijection between cosets, is it enough to find a bijection between an...
I have read a proof but I have a question. To give some context, I first wrote down this proof as written in the book. First, I provide the recursion theorem though.
Recursion theorem:
Let H be a set. Let ##e \in H##. Let ##k: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow H## be a function. Then there exists a...
I wonder why projected area has been of much interest among physics communities, while the surface area could well be the solution unless any complex geometries are involved.
The question popped up in my head when the surface tension in a water jet was derived. Clearly the jet has a circular...
If i have an arbitrary ket then i know it can always be expressed as a linear combination of the basis kets.I now have an operator A which has 2 eigenvalues +1 and -1.
The corresponding eigenvectors are | v >+ = k | b > + m | a > and | v >- = n | c > where | a > , | b > and | c > are...
Hi guys,
So just wondering - the fact that the force is always the negative derivative of potential with respect to distance:
F=-\dfrac{\partial V}{\partial x}
Where does this come from and does it have a name or something? like a theorem perhaps?
Thanks!
NO TEMPLATE BECAUSE MOVED FROM ANOTHER FORUM
Hello,
I've been trying to figure out how it works for complicated problems, I know how to use long division, but I'm not understanding how this process is done for a problem like I have.
Instructions: Write the function in the form ƒ(x) = (x -...
Hello
I am struggling with proving theorem 1, pages 98-99, in Spivak's Calculus book: "A function f cannot approach two different limits near a."
I understand the fact that this theorem is correct. I can easily convince myself by drawing a function in a coordinate system and trying to find two...
Homework Statement
Consider the Klein-Gordon equation ##(\partial_\mu \partial^{\mu}+m^2)\varphi(x)=0##. Using Noether's theorem, find a continuity equation of the form ##\partial_\mu j^{\mu}=0##.
Homework Equations
##(\partial_\mu \partial^{\mu}+m^2)\varphi(x)=0##
The Attempt at a Solution...
Hi,
One silly thing is bothering me. As per one lemma, If a, b, and c are positive integers such that gcd(a, b) = 1 and a | bc, then a | c. This is intuitively obvious. i.e.
Since GCD is 1 'a' does not divide 'b'. Now, 'a' divides 'bc' so, 'a' divides 'c'. Proved.
What is bothering me is ...
Can someone please explain the progression of topics I would need to study in order to tackle Noether's Theorem? I keep hearing how important it is and am setting a self-study goal for myself to eventually understand it with enough rigour that I can appreciate it's beauty.
I have a feeling I...
Homework Statement
F(x) = (integral from 1 to x^3) (t^2 - 10)/(t + 1) dt
Evaluate F'(x)
Homework Equations
Using the chain rule
The Attempt at a Solution
Let u = x^3
Then:
[((x^3)^2 - 10) / (x^3 + 1)] ⋅ 3x^2
*step cancelling powers of x from fraction*
= (x^3 - 10)(3x^2)
= 3x^5 - 30x^2
I am...
Hi everybody! I'm currently studying Noether's theorem, but I'm a bit stuck around a stupid line of calculation for the variation of the symmetry. The script of my teacher says (roughly translated from German, equations left as he wrote them):
"V.2. Noether Theorem
How does the action change...
I am reading the book, Basic Abstract Algebra by P.B. Bhattacharya, S.K. Jain, and S.R. Nagpaul ... ... and am currently focused on Chapter 2: Integers, Real Numbers and Complex Numbers ...
I need help with an aspect of the proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic in Section 1.3 ... ...
I am reading the book, Basic Abstract Algebra by P.B. Bhattacharya, S.K. Jain, and S.R. Nagpaul ... ... and am currently focused on Chapter 2: Integers, Real Numbers and Complex Numbers ...I need help with an aspect of the proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic in Section 1.3 ... ...The...
I am reading Joseph J. Rotman's book: Advanced Modern Algebra (AMA) and I am currently focused on Section 5.1 Prime Ideals and Maximal Ideals ...
I need some help with understanding the proof of Theorem 5.12 ... ...Theorem 5.12 reads as follows:
In the above text Rotman writes the following:"...
I am reading Joseph J. Rotman's book: Advanced Modern Algebra (AMA) and I am currently focused on Section 5.1 Prime Ideals and Maximal Ideals ...
I need some help with understanding the proof of Theorem 5.12 ... ...Theorem 5.12 reads as follows:
In the above text Rotman writes the following:"...
I am reading Joseph J. Rotman's book: Advanced Modern Algebra (AMA) and I am currently focused on Section 5.1 Prime Ideals and Maximal Ideals ...
I need some help with understanding the proof of Proposition 5.9 ... ...Proposition 5.9 reads as follows:
In the proof of Proposition 5.9, Rotman...
I am reading Joseph J. Rotman's book: Advanced Modern Algebra (AMA) and I am currently focused on Section 5.1 Prime Ideals and Maximal Ideals ...
I need some help with understanding the proof of Proposition 5.9 ... ...Proposition 5.9 reads as follows: In the proof of Proposition 5.9, Rotman...
Bell's theorem states that super-luminal communication exists between particles that are separated by space-like separation viz. faster than light transmission of information. There is spontaneity in this. Relativistically this would amount to going back in time. The state of creation of...
Homework Statement
attempt to derive the equation of centripetal acceleration using work energy theorem
Homework Equations
work done = Change in kinetic energy The Attempt at a Solution
consider diametrically opposed points occurring in uniform circular motion - displacement = 2*R and let...
Moment of inertia is supposed to be defined with respect to a rotational axis such that for a system of point masses, I=∑miri2 where ri 's are the perpendicular distances of the particles from the axis.
However, in some derivations of the virial theorem (like the one on wiki), the so-called...
Homework Statement
Let S be the portion of the paraboloid ##z = 4 - x^2 - y^2 ## that lies above the plane ##z = 0## and let ##\vec F = < z-y, x+z, -e^{ xyz }cos y >##. Use Stoke's Theorem to find the surface integral ##\iint_S (\nabla × \vec F) ⋅ \vec n \,dS##.
Homework Equations
##\iint_S...
Let me set up the question briefly. Emmy Noether's theorem relates symmetry to conserved quantities, e.g. invariance under translations in time => conservation of energy. A fundamental truth revealed.
Massive gauge bosons, leptons and quarks all appear to acquire mass through the spontaneous...
So, I know that the gauss law states that the Flux of the electric field through a closed surface is Q/ε , but does the gauss theorem works also for non inverse square law Fields?
I think not because in order to not have a Flux depending on distance but a constant one we need that r^2 of the...
Suppose we have equal and opposite charge densities on a parallel plate capacitor. Let the plates be separated some small distance d (small when compared with the plate size). Now slowly separate the plates so that their separation is now doubled to 2d. We have done work and the electrostatic...
Homework Statement
[/B]
Suppose we have a 2\pi-periodic, integrable function f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{C} whose Fourier coefficients are known. Parseval's theorem tells us that:
\sum_{n = -\infty}^{\infty}|\widehat{f(n)}|^2 = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}|f(x)|^{2}dx,
where...
As I understand it Blochs theorem says that the solutions to the one electron Schrödinger equation in a periodic potential has the form:
ψ(r) = exp(i k⋅r)un(r)
, where un(r) has the same periodicity as the lattice and n labels the band number.
Now a detail that confuses me: In a book I am...
I am trying to prove this function theorem:
Let F:X→Y and G:Y→Z be functions. Then
a. If F and G are both 1 – 1 then G∘F is 1 – 1.
b. If F and G are both onto then G∘F is onto.
c. If F and G are both 1 – 1 correspondences then G∘F is a 1 – 1 correspondence.
Part a has already been...
Hello, I know a theorem that say that if ##F : \mathbb{R} \times \Omega \rightarrow E## is continuous and local lispchitziann in is seconde set value(where ##\Omega## is an open of a Banach space E.). we have that the maximum solution ##(\phi, J)##(where J is an open intervall and ##\phi : J...
The proofs of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in the textbook I'm reading and those that I have found online, basically show us:
1) That when we apply the definition of the derivative to the integral of f (say F) below, we get f back.
F(x) = \int_a^x f(t) dt
2) That any definite integral...
I am reading T. S. Blyth's book "Module Theory: An Approach to Linear Algebra" ... ... and am currently focussed on Chapter 1: Modules, Vector Spaces and Algebras ... ...
I need help with a basic and possibly simple aspect of Theorem 2.3 ...
Since the answer to my question may depend on...
71. Use the Comparison Theorem to determine weather the integral
$$\displaystyle
I=\int\frac{{x}^{2}}{{x}^{5}+2} \, dx$$
is convergent or divergent.
Comparison Theorem Suppose that $f$ and $g$ are continuous with
$f(x) \ge \, g(x) \ge 0 $ for $x\ge a$
(a) if $\displaystyle \int_{a}^{\infty}...
Homework Statement
Let be ##f \in C^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{n}, \mathbb{R}^{n})## and ##a \in \mathbb{R}^{n}## with ##f(a) = a##. I'm looking for a suffisent and necessar condition on f that for all ##(x_{n})## define by ##f(x_{n}) = x_{n+1}##, then ##(x_{n})## converge.
Homework Equations
##f(a) =...
I am reading T. S. Blyth's book "Module Theory: An Approach to Linear Algebra" ... ... and am currently focussed on Chapter 1: Modules, Vector Spaces and Algebras ... ...
I need help with an aspect of Theorem 1.1 part 4 ...
Theorem 1.1 in Blyth reads as follows:
In the above text, in part 4...
I am reading T. S. Blyth's book "Module Theory: An Approach to Linear Algebra" ... ... and am currently focussed on Chapter 1: Modules, Vector Spaces and Algebras ... ...
I need help with an aspect of Theorem 1.1 part 4 ...
Theorem 1.1 in Blyth reads as follows:In the above text, in part 4 of...