I Adapting Schwarzschild Metric for Nonzero Λ

Sciencemaster
Messages
129
Reaction score
20
TL;DR Summary
The Schwarzschild metric is designed with a cosmological constant in mind. Would it be feasible to make some modifications to it that would make it apply in a spacetime with a nonzero Λ?
So, there are a fair amount of metrics designed with a zero value for the cosmological constant in mind. I was wondering if there was some method to modify metrics to account for a nonzero cosmological constant. Say, for instance, the Schwarzschild metric due to its relative simplicity. A feature of the metric is that it has a stress-energy tensor of 0 due to both the ricci tensor and scalar curvature going to 0. However, this doesn't happen if the cosmological constant is nonzero. So, would there be a way to modify a metric to account for a nonzero cosmological constant while keeping fundamental features intact--in this case, the 0 stress energy tensor and general form of the Schwarzschild metric? I tried multiplying by a constant as well as a few other minor modifications, and none of them gave a SET of 0. So, would it be feasible to make some modification to a metric designed for Λ=0 in order for it to apply when Λ is nonzero while still keeping similar basic properties?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's Schwarzschild-deSitter spacetime, if I understand what you're trying to do.

I don't know about "keeping similar basic properties". There are some quite significant differences, such as a maximum mass for a black hole.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeterDonis
Sciencemaster said:
would there be a way to modify a metric to account for a nonzero cosmological constant while keeping fundamental features intact--in this case, the 0 stress energy tensor and general form of the Schwarzschild metric?
Of course you can't keep everything else exactly the same when you add a nonzero cosmological constant. But the Schwarzschild-de Sitter solution, which @Ibix mentioned, is what you get when you assume spherical symmetry, a nonzero cosmological constant, and no other stress-energy present. If you look it up, you will see that its metric is quite similar to the Schwarzschild metric; the only difference (at least in the coordinates that correspond to standard Schwarzschild coordinates) is an extra term in ##\Lambda## in ##g_{rr}## and ##g_{tt}##.
 
First off, I want to add that I made a mistake. I said something along the lines of, 'keeping the Schwarzschild metric's property of a 0 SET. However, I neglected the ambient energy density in the universe that contributes to the nonzero cosmological constant. So...yeah, I was thinking about a metric that gave $$T_{00}=\frac{\rho_{vacuum}}{c^2}$$. Ignoring that, thanks for suggesting the Schwarzschild-de Sitter, that definitely helps and might be close enough to what I'm looking for!
 
Sciencemaster said:
Schwarzschild-de Sitter, that definitely helps and might be close enough to what I'm looking for!
It is what you are looking for; it is the unique metric that satisfies the condition you give in post #4 and also contains a Schwarzschild black hole.
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top