Advice on calculating the determinant for 3x3 Matrix by inspection

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the determinant of the given 3x3 matrix using elementary row operations, the matrix is transformed into a triangular form. The operations performed included modifying rows to achieve the triangular structure, but an error occurred due to the incorrect use of a negative prefactor in one of the row operations. This mistake led to a sign error in the determinant calculation, resulting in an incorrect value of -3 instead of the correct value of 3. The correct approach involves ensuring that row operations maintain the determinant's sign by using appropriate coefficients. Understanding these principles clarifies the determinant calculation process.
SubZer0
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is to calculate the determinant of 3x3 Matrix by using elementary row operations. The matrix is:

A =
[1 0 1]
[0 1 2]
[1 1 0]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



By following the properties of determinants, I attempt to get a triangular matrix. The steps I follow are:

R3 = (-1)*R1 + R3
[1 0 1]
[0 1 2]
[0 1 -1]

R3 = (-1)*R3 + R2
[1 0 1]
[0 1 2]
[0 0 3]

Which is now a triangular matrix. To calculate the determinant, it should be a simple matter of multiplying the elements of the diagonal, eg. 1 * 1 * 3 = 3. If I calculate the determinant by cofactor, the determinant is -3.
By following the row operations (adding a multiple of a row), this should not affect the determinant. Where am I going wrong?

Retrospectively, doing a row swap of 1 and 3 would have been easier, but this, theoretically, should work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can only add/subtract other rows to a row. The linear combination you replace the row with must have 1 as the prefactor of the old row. In your case you are doing
SubZer0 said:
R3 = (-1)*R3 + R2
which has -1 as the prefactor. You need to do R3new = R3 - R2. Because you put a minus sign before R3, you are getting a sign error.
 
Thanks, Orodruin, this makes perfect sense now. Thanks for the explanation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top