Are Alternative Explanations for Dark Matter Being Overlooked?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion questions the validity of dark matter as an explanation for gravitational anomalies, suggesting that alternative theories, like modifying gravitational formulas, should be considered. It highlights that physicists often propose new particles instead of revising existing gravitational models, which some view as unnecessarily complex. The theory of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) is mentioned as an alternative that attempts to adjust gravitational equations but struggles to align with all observations of galactic motion. Additionally, the distinction between dark matter and dark energy is clarified, noting that dark energy is uniformly distributed and drives the universe's expansion, while dark matter can clump like normal matter. The conversation emphasizes the need for further exploration of alternative explanations for gravitational phenomena.
Mephisto
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
I keep hearing about how this exotic Dark Matter is supposed to be evenly spread out across the universe... and that it doesn't interact with normal matter, only through gravitation, etc...

My question is, how is this the valid conclusion from the fact that our Gravitation formulas don't seem to work properly? Why do physicists make up particles instead of just considering the possibility that our formulas for gravitation outside our solar system may be wrong, or something like that? I mean... making up a whole new particle and claiming that it fills all space around us seems like the hard way to make the math come out.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There is a theory (called MOND) which does exactly what you are suggesting (changing formulas for gravity). The problem with MOND seems to getting it to be consistent withh all observations about galactic motion, etc.
 
I think you may be slightly confused between dark matter and dark energy. Dark Energy is the stuff that is proposed to be everywhere around us, spread out evenly, which is causing the acceleration of the expansion of the universe. Dark matter is allowed to clump, like normal matter.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top