Atmospheric Density - Equation to Model from Sea Level to 200km

AI Thread Summary
An equation for modeling atmospheric density from sea level to 200 km is given by P=(Patm)*e^(-Mgh/RT) and D=PM/RT, though it assumes constant temperature and provides only rough estimates. Higher altitudes exhibit significant variability in density due to factors like solar activity. Alternative approaches include using an exponential curve fit, such as P = P0 * exp(ah^3 + bh^2 + h), for better accuracy. Various standard atmospheres, like US and ICAO models, offer insights into pressure and temperature changes with altitude, albeit with limitations. For practical modeling, utilizing tools like Excel for graphing data is recommended.
ZachWeiner
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey, does anyone have an equation that roughly models atmospheric density from sea level to about 200 km up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's not much of an equation for atmospheric pressure that's simple. If you have a CRC handbook you could look up a few values. You should know, as well, that it's quit variable at higher altitudes, dependent on solar activity.
 
Hi ZachWeiner,
Pressure at a height "h" is given by :
P=(Patm)*e^(-Mgh/RT) [Patm is the pressure at sea level]
And D=PM/RT
But there is an assumption that T is const. this formula will only enable you to calculate the density roughly. So do not use it if you want accurate answers.
 
aniketp said:
Hi ZachWeiner,
Pressure at a height "h" is given by :
P=(Patm)*e^(-Mgh/RT) [Patm is the pressure at sea level]
And D=PM/RT
But there is an assumption that T is const. this formula will only enable you to calculate the density roughly. So do not use it if you want accurate answers.

I have no excuse for it, but in response to this question, I actually tried an exponential curve of pressure vs. height, and fit it to two points of data; sea level and 100 Km. It was off by 28% at 50 Km. Very disappointing.

To get a decent curve fit, P = P0 * exp(ah^3 + bh^2 + h) might do it.
 
what do you need to model it for? pretty much any fluid mechanics text will tell you in a table at the back.

lol.. if u really want to model it, put all the numbers into excel and graph it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top