Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapses after Ship Strike

  • Thread starter Borg
  • Start date
  • #246
Nik_2213 said:
too many clamorous alarms to quickly identify the true problem
As a former maritime electrical operator, I'd love to hear the story from the electricians point of view. And no holds barred on the finger pointing. I've thumbed through the NTSB report a couple of times, and in my opinion, it's a bit lacking in electrical details. I'm interested in the refrigerated containers. What was their cumulative load? Did they have to operate them in banks because their cumulative load was greater than the ship could handle? Were they in operation during the ships departure from the harbor? It was 1 am on March 26 in Maryland so I'm guessing it was not very warm out. (37°F per weatherunderground).
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Rive, BillTre and 3 others
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #247
I found this. Not sure if it is accurate.

The Dali is of the 10.000 TEU class, with 9.971 slots for 20feet containers (TEU) whereof 1400 slots can accomodate reefer containers.
In general, any containervessel can load a mix of 20feet and 40feet containers, as the container-fittings on the hatches and the container-guides in holds and on deck are designed for such purpose…

https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/mv-dali-container-counts/69007/14
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #248
Watched a cruise ship enter the harbor this morning - escorted by two tugs.

05-30-24_VisionOfTheSeas.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
  • #249
OmCheeto said:
I'm interested in the refrigerated containers. What was their cumulative load?
So your suspicion is, ahem, Reefer Madness?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes ShadowKraz, Astronuc, OmCheeto and 1 other person
  • #250
Vanadium 50 said:
So your suspicion is, ahem, Reefer Madness?
Brilliant! Too much reefer, man.
 
  • #251
Vanadium 50 said:
So your suspicion is, ahem, Reefer Madness?
It was mentioned here about a month before the report was issued.

Tom.G said:
Shortly after the bridge crash, I stumbled across a report that the electrical problems whle still in port were caused by power being supplied to too many refrigerated containers. The electrical load was re-distributed several time to stop tripping the circuit breakers.

I was not aware that refrigerated containers were electrically driven.

I also have not been able to find the report again, so please take the above with a bit of scepticism.

jedishrfu said:
I found this news reference that mentions that theory

https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/n...apse/507-02e9a160-2ab6-463c-99ce-08f9862d9e45
I would like to see an official report, as jedishrfu's reference states;

The Dali experienced apparent electrical issues before leaving port, according to someone with knowledge of the situation. The person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to comment, said alarms went off on the ship’s refrigerated containers while it was still docked in Baltimore, likely indicating an inconsistent power supply.

Not quite enough information to form an educated guess, IMHO.

According to Gmax's reference in post #247, this class ship has a capacity for 1400 reefer containers. That's fine and dandy, but it doesn't tell me anything about the total load, or split partial loads, or surge currents if a bank of such reefers were being cycled on and off. Was the 30 man crew playing some kind of whack-a-mole game, plugging in and out 1400 extension cords to keep alarms from going off?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Rive
  • #252
Speed running container ship...

 
  • Wow
Likes BillTre
  • #253
Swamp Thing said:
Speed running container ship...

Ship at full throttle in harbor causes major South Carolina bridge to close until it passes safely
https://apnews.com/article/bridge-c...hrottle-ship-1bf6e945d5170314dfbfb1c761698217

A large cargo ship lost control of its engines and went nearly full throttle through a South Carolina harbor Wednesday, prompting the closure of one of the busiest bridges in the state.

Harbor pilots were able to help the nearly 1,000-foot (300-meter) ship, which was going nearly 20 mph (32 kmh), get under the Ravenel Bridge safely and eventually anchor several miles offshore while the Coast Guard investigates, said Randy Preston, commander of the U.S. Coast Guard’s Charleston Section.
 
  • #254
Swamp Thing said:
Speed running container ship...


Why didn’t they just pull the valve lifter knob on the bulkhead? It worked for my Volvo twin 22hp without fail.
The equivalent could be built in surely as a manual override. I do realise the ship’s cylinders are bigger than my whole boat.
 
  • #255
sophiecentaur said:
Why didn’t they just pull the valve lifter knob on the bulkhead?
Maybe it's a two stroke?
 
  • #256
gmax137 said:
Maybe it's a two stroke?
In all seriousness, it might actually be. But I think they still have a valve system that’s more complicated than the port-based ones you find on most small 2-stroke engines.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #257
Flyboy said:
In all seriousness, it might actually be. But I think they still have a valve system that’s more complicated than the port-based ones you find on most small 2-stroke engines.
Yeah even the two stroke engines have a fuel injection system. I'm not sure how marine engines are stopped, but I would guess there is a way to shut off the fuel.
 
  • #258
Swamp Thing said:
Speed running container ship...
A little faster and it would give new meaning to the term "harbor pilot".
 
  • #259
And a new meaning to "airship".
 
  • #260
gmax137 said:
Yeah even the two stroke engines have a fuel injection system. I'm not sure how marine engines are stopped, but I would guess there is a way to shut off the fuel.
It makes you wonder about the qualifications of ships' engineers these days. The knowledge level of some may be restricted to 'operator' level and not 'fixit' level. Of course, there will be Engineers who really know their stuff but the accountants may not rate that s necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes ShadowKraz
  • #261
gmax137 said:
Yeah even the two stroke engines have a fuel injection system. I'm not sure how marine engines are stopped, but I would guess there is a way to shut off the fuel.
Maybe they decided a fast but otherwise under control and powered ship was a lower risk than shutting off the engine and.....
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #262
russ_watters said:
Maybe they decided a fast but otherwise under control and powered ship was a lower risk than shutting off the engine and.....
Yeah, the first thing I thought of was how closing that exhaust damper on the Dali killed the engine. Then I remembered that it resulted in a loss of steering...
 
  • Like
Likes ShadowKraz
  • #263
Do we cut them a break for having made decisions that avoided an accident?
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes ShadowKraz and Tom.G
  • #264
Vanadium 50 said:
Do we cut them a break for having made decisions that avoided an accident?
Yes.

d4e167ccd11b4af242a72ca99f82e8b4f3650b73c7c5214ccf679816187585e1.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes Vanadium 50, Borg and berkeman
  • #265
berkeman said:
Yeah, the first thing I thought of was how closing that exhaust damper on the Dali killed the engine. Then I remembered that it resulted in a loss of steering...
Vanadium 50 said:
Do we cut them a break for having made decisions that avoided an accident?
Pilot Captain, I can stop the engine!

No.
 
  • #266
A similar argument to car throttle jamming open ?
Yes, you may turn off ignition, but you then lose the power steering etc...
Better to negotiate a few 'mild' bends, albeit scary-fast, and kill engine on 'straight'...
 
  • #267
Nik_2213 said:
Better to negotiate a few 'mild' bends, albeit scary-fast, and kill engine on 'straight'...
Better yet to click the transmission into Neutral and stop ASAP (safely). :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes ShadowKraz and Nik_2213
  • #268
True !! FWIW, the example I half-remembered had the gearbox / shift jam, too...
 
  • Wow
Likes berkeman
  • #269
berkeman said:
Better yet to click the transmission into Neutral and stop ASAP (safely). :smile:
When you do that, the engine revs up instantly. It's pretty terrifying.
 
  • #270
Vanadium 50 said:
When you do that, the engine revs up instantly. It's pretty terrifying.
Sure, but that's why engines have rev limiters. :smile:
 
  • #271
And why seats have Scotchguard.
 
  • Haha
Likes jbriggs444, ShadowKraz, Tom.G and 1 other person
  • #272
Baltimore shipping channel fully reopens after bridge collapse
https://apnews.com/article/baltimor...nnel-reopens-cf12f3b3e2914efa05a91dd399b0dd64
BALTIMORE (AP) — The main shipping channel into Baltimore’s port has fully reopened to its original depth and width following the March 26 collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which blocked most maritime traffic into the harbor.

Officials announced the full reopening in a news release Monday evening. It comes after a massive cleanup effort as crews removed an estimated 50,000 tons of steel and concrete from the Patapsco River.

After the Dali was moved, crews opened a channel that was 50 feet (15 meters) deep and 400 feet (122 meters) wide. The full federal shipping channel is 700 feet (213 meters) wide, which means two-way traffic can resume, officials said. They said other additional safety requirements have also been lifted because of the increased width.

Officials said a total of 56 federal, state and local agencies participated in the salvage operations, including about 500 specialists from around the world who operated a fleet of 18 barges, 22 tugboats, 13 floating cranes, 10 excavators and four survey boats.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, gleem and sophiecentaur
  • #273
 
  • #274
"faulty wiring" fgs
 
  • #275
While Chief MAKOi has supplied us with more information, it appears to me that he's guessing.
Also, while I have zero knowledge of this type of vessel, it strikes me as very peculiar that the chief's schematic shows the 'reefer containers' and 'bow thrusters' running on 6600 volts. A quick google shows that these type of 'reefers' run on 440 volts, which would be more in line what I would suspect.

https://www.elecdirect.com/pin-sleeve-devices/reefer-plugs-sockets

As a general rule, I don't like being pedantic, but this makes me question whether he really knows what he's talking about or is just mansplaining.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and BillTre
  • #276
or is just marinesplaining
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters, OmCheeto, jack action and 1 other person
  • #277
OmCheeto said:
he's guessing.
Until we get an official report, isn't everyone just guessing?
 
  • #278
OmCheeto said:
it strikes me as very peculiar that the chief's schematic shows the 'reefer containers' and 'bow thrusters' running on 6600 volts. A quick google shows that these type of 'reefers' run on 440 volts, which would be more in line what I would suspect.
Maybe the reefer banks have transformers not shown on that schematic?

I don't have any background in marine design but ... In stationary plants I've seen 440 volts for small stuff, 4160 volts for motors up to 400 to 500 hp, and 6600 volts for big motors. How big do you suppose the thruster motors are?
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #280
gmax137 said:
Maybe the reefer banks have transformers not shown on that schematic?

I don't have any background in marine design but ... In stationary plants I've seen 440 volts for small stuff, 4160 volts for motors up to 400 to 500 hp, and 6600 volts for big motors. How big do you suppose the thruster motors are?
https://chiefengineerlog.com/2022/1...ine industry, voltages below,6.6 kV and 11 kV.

The 6600 volts seems to be used for distribution over long distances, with step down transformers located near the loads. Maybe some simplified diagrams don't show the transformers separately, but merge them with the 440V loads, as gmax suggests.
 

Similar threads

2
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
54
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Back
Top