Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.

In summary, the conversation revolved around an individual's passion for collecting and restoring old devices, particularly electrical components from the early 1900s. They shared photos of their collection, which included vintage bulbs, switches, and transformers, and discussed the craftsmanship and attention to detail of these items. The conversation also touched on the nostalgia and sentimental value of preserving and working with old technology. The individual credited their interest in old devices to a scrap collector who allowed them to explore his collection as a child.
  • #456
Baluncore said:
So, what are the actual numbers written on the chip, and how do you know it is a TTL 7490 ?
There's lots of cross reference tables on the web, like this one. ICs in HP instruments rarely have JEDEC labels. I don't have a clue about the lot/date code though.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #457
DaveE said:
I don't have a clue about the lot/date code though.
Why will you not give me all the numbers ?
 
  • #458
Baluncore said:
So, what are the actual numbers written on the chip, and how do you know it is a TTL 7490 ?
I zoomed in on the image and it looks like it's a TI 1820-0055:
TIIC.jpg

According to this site it's equivalent to the 7490 decade counter.
 
  • #459
Baluncore said:
Why will you not give me all the numbers ?
Sorry I don't understand. If you're asking why I won't give you the lot/date code decoding for TI semiconductor DIP markings from 50 years ago, it's because I don't know or care.

I never really did care much about date codes, except in unusual circumstances, and even then it was mostly about matching or making sure you're not doing a parameter characterization on a bunch of nearly identical parts. If I needed to know that stuff I would have already been talking to the applications engineers about it anyway.

Still if I had to bet I'd say the 52nd week of 1969, as you suggested.
 
  • #460
DaveE said:
...it's because I don't know or care.
Now I'm wondering why you posted this?
 
  • #461
C
dlgoff said:
Now I'm wondering why you posted this?
Caring about old equipment isn't the same thing as caring about decoding IC lot/date codes from 50 years ago.
 
  • #462
DaveE said:
...it's because I don't know or care.
DaveE said:
Caring about old equipment isn't the same thing as caring about decoding IC lot/date codes from 50 years ago.
Well, you did post it in my Beauty thread. You don't think date codes goes into my restorations?
 
  • #463
dlgoff said:
Well, you did post it in my Beauty thread. You don't think date codes goes into my restorations?
I don't know anything about your restorations, but I think it's cool if you care about them. Nevertheless, we all don't, nor should we, care about exactly the same stuff.

Just let me know if you don't want me to post here anymore, I don't wish to interfere with your thread ownership concerns.
 
  • #464
DaveE said:
Just let me know if you don't want me to post here anymore, I don't wish to interfere with your thread ownership concerns.
No problem with your post, as I gave you a :oldlove: like for it's beauty.
 
  • #465
DaveE said:
Just let me know if you don't want me to post here anymore, I don't wish to interfere with your thread ownership concerns.
It's more like a loving commune, not so much ownership. :wink:
 
  • Love
Likes dlgoff and Klystron
  • #466
I've been restoring this old Universal Radio. I've replaced all the tubes (most are metal tubes). One of the coolest glass tubes is the 6U5/6G5 magic eye tuning tube.

@berkeman mentioned me in this post when discussing coils. Lots of coils here.

universal radio.jpg

universal radio front.jpg

universal radio top.jpg

universal radio bottom.jpg

I think all I need to do now to get it to work is replace all the electrolytic capacitors.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes collinsmark, Klystron and DaveE
  • #467
Wow, what year is that from?
 
  • #468
berkeman said:
Wow, what year is that from?
Well I'm not too sure but I think it's from the 1920s. This was in an old warehouse owned by a lady who I asked if she was interested in selling it; that was sometime in the 1970s. She had no interest in selling it and said just take it.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #469
It's weeping in distress. Help me. :wink:
1615385640174.png

I'm curious. What is your general procedure for these restorations?
  • Disassemble everything?
  • Restore cosmetically as well as functionally? Internally too?
  • If you must replace something, like a segment of wire or an electrolytic capacitor, do you use modern parts and materials?
  • Lots of questions.

A short tutorial, "How to go about an electrical restoration." would be educational and entertaining.

Edit: An Insights article would be perfect.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #470
anorlunda said:
It's weeping in distress. Help me. :wink:
View attachment 279531
I'm curious. What is your general procedure for these restorations?
  • Disassemble everything?
  • Restore cosmetically as well as functionally? Internally too?
  • If you must replace something, like a segment of wire or an electrolytic capacitor, do you use modern parts and materials?
  • Lots of questions.

A short tutorial, "How to go about an electrical restoration." would be educational and entertaining.

Edit: An Insights article would be perfect.
In this case,
  • Restore cosmetically as well as functionally? Internally too?
I'll have to write up something as a tutorial. But I'm a little underwater with time right now. Soon heading for my second Moderna COVID-19 shot.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda and berkeman
  • #471
anorlunda said:
It's weeping in distress. Help me.
Indeed. I never noticed this. The whole radio needed help.
 
  • #472
One of the most difficult parts of this restore was keeping all the cloth covered wire from shorting together. I dissolved some silicon sealant in alcohol and painted all of them before powering up this old radio.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Klystron and DaveE
  • #473
dlgoff said:
I dissolved some silicon sealant in alcohol and painted all of them before powering up this old radio.
That right there is a cool tip.
 
  • Love
Likes dlgoff
  • #474
Very interesting radio chassis. The tubes (valves in UK?) appear familiar but the jumble of circuit components makes one think the design engineer ignored placement issues such as inter-electrode and distributed impedance. The receiver probably frequency drifts as the tubes warm up; hence, the vernier dial controls?
 
  • #475
Klystron said:
The tubes (valves in UK?) appear familiar but the jumble of circuit components makes one think the design engineer ignored placement issues such as inter-electrode and distributed impedance.
What design engineer? My grandfather provided for his family during the great depression by making radios out of Quaker oatmeal containers. That makes me believe that in those days, many sources could manufacture electrical things without the services of a real engineer.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Informative
Likes Averagesupernova, berkeman and Klystron
  • #476
As far as lead placement and such goes, the AM broadcast band is very forgiving. We're not talking about VHF or even HF here. I used to work with a guy who said jokingly that anything below 100 MHz is DC.
 
  • Haha
Likes Rive, DrClaude and dlgoff
  • #477
anorlunda said:
Edit: An Insights article would be perfect.
Good idea. Let me think about it. In this thread, I have, I think, gave some info about how the restores were done. Mainly, making them look beautiful and working is part of the beauty.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes Klystron and berkeman
  • #478
Averagesupernova said:
As far as lead placement and such goes, the AM broadcast band is very forgiving. We're not talking about VHF or even HF here. I used to work with a guy who said jokingly that anything below 100 MHz is DC.
There are three bands indicated: Broadcast, Amateur, and Shortwave (5.5meters to 55meters) labled: FOREIGN, PHONE, and SHIPS.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #479
"Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc."
I recently won a real beauty on an online auction. :smile: I will take some photos and post later here.
 
  • #480
DennisN said:
I recently won a real beauty on an online auction. :smile: I will take some photos and post later here.

Here is my recently bought Yashica Electro 35 rangefinder camera (from late 1960s to early 1970s).
Quote from Wikipedia: "It was the first electronically controlled camera."

I won it recently at an online auction for about $66. It is in marvellous condition (near mint).

I bought it for nostalgic reasons; my father had one and it was one of the very first cameras I used as a child.
It was amazing to get a hold of one, since I started to remember all the controls and even the look in the viewfinder. I even recognized the smell of it, actually!

Here are some photos:

Front:
1 Front.jpg


Back (opened):
2 Opened.jpg


The "atomic" logo:
3 Logo.jpg


Top:
(from left to right: film winder, hot shoe for flash, exposure indicators (I think) (slow/over), film ISO setting, shutter button, frame winder, frame number window)

4 Top.jpg


Lens closeup:
(the red "thingy" on the lens is a timer for taken timed shots. You pull it to a certain distance and then press the shutter button, and when the timer "thingy" reaches the default position, a photo is taken)

5 Timer.jpg


It may very well work too, and I am thinking of trying to use it some day.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DrClaude, jedishrfu, dlgoff and 3 others
  • #481
Nice camera. Let's hope it works and that you can find some film to fit it.

I like the atomic logo too.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and DennisN
  • #482
In the same vein, here's my "used to be my parents" Bell and Howell movie camera and case, from the 1950's
Mov_cam2.jpg

case2.jpg
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu, dlgoff and DennisN
  • #483
My Dad had something like that too and the projector to go with it. My how things have absolutely changed.
 
  • Love
Likes dlgoff
  • #484
jedishrfu said:
My Dad had something like that too and the projector to go with it. My how things have absolutely changed.
Yeah, mine too. Remember how every once in a while the film would break during home movie night? Dad would say, "We will now take a quick break while I splice this back together...". I guess we still have something similar -- "Dad, our WiFi just went down!" :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, jedishrfu, dlgoff and 1 other person
  • #485
berkeman said:
Yeah, mine too. Remember how every once in a while the film would break during home movie night? Dad would say, "We will now take a quick break while I splice this back together...". I guess we still have something similar -- "Dad, our WiFi just went down!" :wink:
We had the projector too, though I don't know what came of it. Did anyone else's folks have the Light Bar for the camera? It Looked like this:
https://d3h6k4kfl8m9p0.cloudfront.net/stories/IhHqBoi5vwc61d7GHxm6Hw.jpeg
It was used for indoor filming. The camera would mount on top.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and dlgoff
  • #486
DennisN said:
Here is my recently bought Yashica Electro 35 rangefinder camera (from late 1960s to early 1970s).
Quote from Wikipedia: "It was the first electronically controlled camera."

I won it recently at an online auction for about $66. It is in marvellous condition (near mint).

I bought it for nostalgic reasons; my father had one and it was one of the very first cameras I used as a child.
It was amazing to get a hold of one, since I started to remember all the controls and even the look in the viewfinder. I even recognized the smell of it, actually!

It may very well work too, and I am thinking of trying to use it some day.
Wow that's amazing condition. Is that an f1.7 lens? Nice. If you ever get tired of it let me know :)
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu, dlgoff and DennisN
  • #487
gmax137 said:
Is that an f1.7 lens?
Yes. And the lens is fixed to the camera, so it can't be used on other cameras without using violence. :smile:
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and dlgoff
  • #488
gmax137 said:
If you ever get tired of it let me know :)
I was keeping an eye on Ebay for a while for Yashica Electro 35, and there were/are items available in various conditions between ca $70 and $140. I saw one in excellent condition for about $140 available for shipping from Japan, and I was considering it for a while. Later, I was lucky to find my item on a Swedish online auction site for a much better price, so I went for that one.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes gmax137, jedishrfu and dlgoff
  • #489
Now that's some beauty. Thanks for posting it here.
"...and I am thinking of trying to use it some day."
Which makes it even more beautiful.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and DennisN
  • #490
jedishrfu said:
Nice camera. Let's hope it works and that you can find some film to fit it.

I like the atomic logo too.
Both Kodak and Fuji still make 35mm film, readily available too!
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and jedishrfu

Similar threads

Back
Top