- #386
Serbian.matematika
- 64
- 0
RufusDawes, nothing beats being an Electrical Engineer.
True, but you CAN ship over foreign engineers to do the on-site stuff for reasonable time and money. That this doesn't happen in the United States (and other western countries) has more to do with accreditation requirements and other regulations than any fundamental aspect of the work. But it's very much commonplace for countries in the developing world to ship in foreign (usually Western) engineers when they want to build a skysraper or big bridge or dam.
Serbian.matematika said:RufusDawes, nothing beats being an Electrical Engineer.
In the past, EE provided you with jobs involving cutting-edge information and communication technologies. Now, the majority of EE work is offshored to India and China. Recently, this has included advanced R&D centers too.Hydrargyrum said:What's so great about EE? I hear it requires a lot of complex analysis, but what are the benefits
perfectchaos180 said:ok guys I need some help. I am great at math. I am taking pretty much VERY advanced physics classes and math classes right now (in high school, basically higher than AP level) and I am doing fine. I also loved the technical drawing courses at my high school I love math, physics is my favorite subject and I am pretty sure I want to go into engineering. I love learning about how everyday things around us work and engineering seems like exactly what I want to do as a career. The only problem is that sometimes in my physics classes we are told to build something out of other things. I have a hard time thinking of ways I can build something that works. For instance we built a Rube Goldberg machine, the rest of my group thought of most of the ideas, I just couldn't think of anything. This is a key part of being an engineer, and just tell me, does it get better with practice?
RufusDawes said:Well if that's the case engineers should unionise their asses and demand what they deserve.
Without you guys this country would fall apart. Hell without you guys we wouldn't have undustry. People don't have nearly enough respect for technical people, tradesmen included.
But the won't hesistate to worship and I - banker.
If this is the case engineers need to toughen up.
TVP45 said:IMHO, in the US, late starters have to sell the employer on why they started late. If you've been working as a draftsman and going to engineering school at nights and weekends, that's a plausible story. But, if you've been surfing the great beaches and finally decided you want to earn money, that's a problem.
RufusDawes said:I've always been working but nothing related to Engineering and I went to College, but not for Engineering. I enrolled in Engineering but never started classes because I didn't think I was smart enough but I regret having that attitude now. I am not from the USA I am from Australia. I am 24 at the moment.
TVP45 said:OK, so when the interviewer asks you why you changed careers, what will you say?
RufusDawes said:Hypothetically speaking If I am able to get a BE I don't understand how an employer could rightfully question my motivation if not on superficial grounds. I understand that even for the most gifted of students they are difficult to obtain.
I can't think of a good answer other than to say the truth which is that I am interested in the science behind how machinery operates as I assume completion would demonstrate.
KennyCivE said:I'm trying to figure out how an employer would know your age, and that this is a second career choice. It's illegal for them to ask for it at any point during the interview process (at least that's the case in the U.S.). Do you actually look that much older at age 24? How would the interviewer know you changed careers? Your resume doesn't have to list out all the jobs that you've had, just recent relevant experience.
elephantorz said:Ok guys, I read some of your replies, and honestly, so far this has resounded in me:
"i'm a student in physics and chemical engineering. if you find everything interesting - go for this mix."
I do, but not everything, I LOVE physics, I mean I love it, I could hate it during test-week in Physics II (calc-based) but I always went back to loving it. Thing is, I don't just want to do physics, I want to make a difference, not even because I "want to be remembered" but because I want to be part of doing something beneficial for the world, if not for the world at least for people.
I like working in groups, actually, a lot, I am really good at it (for anyone who knows about this I am an INTP/J, with a high J percentage) but in college a lot of people just didn't want to work, I always got stuck with the lazy-bums and I ended up having to do a lot of the work (if you haven't figured it out by now I am female).
Is that really how it is in the real world? I am specifically interested in CS, maybe computer engineering and physical models, how hard is it to get in that discipline? I know I want to double major, I really like outerspace, and I know I have to learn as much math as I can, and I only want to do that just so I can understand physics.
Any thoughts?
RufusDawes said:Yes I look a fair bit older and I would be 29 when I graduate. Considering how much my mind has already decayed due to inactivity it would be a challenge to get through the degree. I think at that age it is fair call to question my motivation.
RufusDawes said:Personally If I had my time over again I would take a double degee (major ?) of science and engingeering. Vanilla discipline, mechanical, electrical or civil.
One of the following.
electrical/computer science.
mechanical/microbiology
civil engineering/geology -- > mining big money $$$.
I'd recommend putting in that hard yards and getting a double major electrical eng./comsci if that is what you are interested while you are young. The reason is that in my country there are many more opportunities for the vanilla contruction or mining related disciplines than there are more tech and computer orientated engineering.
Can't really speak for the USA.
elephantorz said:I don't really like EE, so CE seems very plausible, however, they have a major here called Engineering Physics (I'm in CO, USA), and also CS, so that seems to be up my alley.
I don't really care about the money so much, of course I want a stable job, I just want to be happy with what I choose. I am still really interested in physical models since I seem to be good at systems.
RufusDawes said:When you say a stable job and to be happy what do you mean ? I could find a stable job at the pub making pizzas and I would be happy, I enjoy making pizzas. However, that is not going to provide the opportunity to do a lot of things including buying a house. So I will need to look for something arguably less fun due to stress that pays a lot more money.