- #106
jdavel
- 617
- 1
Michael D. Sewell said: "Please, let's chill out a little bit, and not abuse the mentors."
How about this? Please, let's chill out a little bit, and not abuse ANYONE.
In my post (#93) I tried to stay on topic, and didn't think I was being in anyway abusive. If anyone thinks I was, then I apologize. That was not my intent.
Integral responed (#95) by calling parts of my post "nonsense" and "serious mumbo jumbo".
I fired back in (#101) with some sarcasm. I don't think anything I said was more abusive than "nonsense" or "serious mumbo jumbo". If anyone thinks otherwise, again, I apologize.
But here's the thing. A forum like this works best when the substance of one post is debated with the substance of another post. Dismissing the substance of one post by characterizing it with insulting adjectives adds nothing to the forum. It only leads to the whole board being cluttered with insults.
In the future I'll debate substance with substance and put anyone who doesn't show me the same courtesy on ignore.
Now, about this elevator...
How about this? Please, let's chill out a little bit, and not abuse ANYONE.
In my post (#93) I tried to stay on topic, and didn't think I was being in anyway abusive. If anyone thinks I was, then I apologize. That was not my intent.
Integral responed (#95) by calling parts of my post "nonsense" and "serious mumbo jumbo".
I fired back in (#101) with some sarcasm. I don't think anything I said was more abusive than "nonsense" or "serious mumbo jumbo". If anyone thinks otherwise, again, I apologize.
But here's the thing. A forum like this works best when the substance of one post is debated with the substance of another post. Dismissing the substance of one post by characterizing it with insulting adjectives adds nothing to the forum. It only leads to the whole board being cluttered with insults.
In the future I'll debate substance with substance and put anyone who doesn't show me the same courtesy on ignore.
Now, about this elevator...