Calculate the force on the tight side of a belt drive

  • Thread starter Thread starter Girn261
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Belt Drive Force
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force on the tight side of a belt drive using given parameters such as a belt coefficient of friction of 0.35, a pulley diameter of 100 cm, and a maximum torque of 200 Nm. The initial calculations led to a force of 400 N, but there was confusion regarding the relationship between T1 and T2 in the context of maximum torque. Participants clarified that T1 and T2 are interconnected through the equation T1 - T2 = 400 N, leading to two equations for further analysis. It was noted that the available information only allows for determining minimum tensions, and adjustments to both tensions will still meet the conditions. The discussion concluded with insights on the conditions for slipping and non-slipping scenarios in belt drives.
Girn261

Homework Statement


Belt coefficient of friction is .35, pulley diameter is 100cm and maximum torque is 200nm. Calculate the force on the tight side

Homework Equations


T2=T1/e^friction*angle

The Attempt at a Solution


T=fr, 200nm=f x .5m , f=400N

T2=T1/e^friction*angle

400N=T1/e^.35*pie

T1=1201.134N answer
I know this is a fairly simple calculation but I'm just wondering if what I did was right. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does "maximum torque" refer to the net torque due to both T1 and T2? If so, then I don't think T2 = 400 N.
 
TSny said:
Does "maximum torque" refer to the net torque due to both T1 and T2? If so, then I don't think T2 = 400 N.

Thank you for the reply, I think you are correct. Thanks for pointing out my mistake , now I need to find T2 & T1.. hmm
 
Girn261 said:
now I need to find T2 & T1.. hmm
Think about how T1 and T2 are related to the 400 N force that you calculated from the max torque.
 
TSny said:
Think about how T1 and T2 are related to the 400 N force that you calculated from the max torque.
T1-T2=400N Max torque.. hmm, now two unknowns
 
..and two equations
 
TSny said:
..and two equations

Sorry bear with me, I'm not that good at this. So,

F2^e*friction*angle - F1/e*friction*angle = 400N. I think that's right so far, now need to figure out next step
 
Girn261 said:
F2^e*friction*angle - F1/e*friction*angle = 400N.
I don't understand this. What's wrong with your original equation T2=T1/eμθ ? (The tool bar has editing tools for superscripts, etc. Σ on the tool bar will bring up math symbols.)

This, along with T1 - T2 = 400 N gives you two equations to work with.
 
Girn261 said:
Calculate the force on the tight side
I would just like to point out that there is only enough information to find the minimum tensions. Any equal increase on that to both tensions will still satisfy the conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
  • #10
haruspex said:
I would just like to point out that there is only enough information to find the minimum tensions. Any equal increase on that to both tensions will still satisfy the conditions.
Would the condition T1 = eμθ T2 still be satisfied?
 
  • #11
TSny said:
Would the condition T1 = eμθ T2 still be satisfied?
That is not a given condition. It is just like linear friction: if slipping, T1 = eμkθ T2; if not slipping T1 ≤ eμsθ T2.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
That is not a given condition. It is just like linear friction: if slipping, T1 = eμkθ T2; if not slipping T1 ≤ eμsθ T2.
Yes, I see that now. Thanks, haruspex.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K