Calculate Unknowns with Sig Figs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quincy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating unknown variables while adhering to the rules of significant figures. The mass of the metal is given as 6.31 g (3 sig figs), while the volume of water is stated as 20.00 mL, which actually has 4 significant figures. The calculated volume of the metal, derived from subtracting the volume of water from the total volume, results in 0.50 mL, which is correctly noted as having 2 significant figures. The density of the metal, calculated from the mass and volume, should reflect the least number of significant figures from the measurements used, resulting in 3 significant figures for the final density value. Overall, the importance of accurately representing significant figures in calculations is emphasized throughout the discussion.
Quincy
Messages
228
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the unknown variables to the appropriate significant figures.


The Attempt at a Solution




mass of metal: 6.31 g - 3 sig figs
volume of water: 20.00 mL - 2 sig figs
volume of water + metal: 20.50 mL - 3 sig figs

volume of metal: 20.50 - 20.00 = 0.50 mL - 2 sig figs
density of metal: 13 g/mL - so the answer should have 2 sig figs correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quincy said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the unknown variables to the appropriate significant figures.


The Attempt at a Solution




mass of metal: 6.31 g - 3 sig figs
volume of water: 20.00 mL - 2 sig figs
No, that's 4 significant figures. That indicates that the measurement might be as much as 20.005 or as little as 19.995 but rounds off to 20.00. If only 2 significant figures were intended, if it might be as high as 20.5 or as low as 19.5, then it would be written as "20. mL". If 3 significant figures were intended (as high as 20.05 or as low as 19.95), it would be written 20.0.

volume of water + metal: 20.50 mL - 3 sig fig
Again, that is 4 significant figures
volume of metal: 20.50 - 20.00 = 0.50 mL - 2 sig figs
Because it is determined by subtracting two figures of 4 significant figures, the result should be to 4 significant figures. It would be better written as 5.000 x 10-1.

[/quote]density of metal: 13 g/mL - so the answer should have 2 sig figs correct?[/QUOTE]
Since you got that by dividing 6.31 g (3 significant figures) by 5.000 x 10-1 mL (4 significant figures) the result should be of the lesser of those: 3 significant figures. Which would be better written 13.0 g/mL or 1.30 x 10-1 g/L
 
0.50 - is this 3 significant figures btw?
 
Quincy said:
0.50 - is this 3 significant figures btw?

No it's two significant figures.
It is one that catches people out because 1.50 WOULD be 3 figures.
The trick is that you could write it as "5.0 divided by 10" and so using only two figures give exactly the same accuracy.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top