Calculating Electric Potential for a Non-Negligible Thickness Toroid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential of a toroid with a non-negligible thickness. There is confusion regarding the linear charge density, specifically why it is expressed as λ = q/(2πR) despite the toroid's width of 2a. Participants highlight that the toroid's larger area implies a potentially lower linear charge density. The challenge of determining the charge distribution for a metallic toroid is acknowledged as a significant complexity in the calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a revised approach to account for the toroid's thickness in electric potential calculations.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For A.1 of this problem,
1675405830601.png

The solution is
1675399497646.png

However, I have a doubt about the linear charge density ##\lambda##.

I don't understand how ##\lambda = \frac {q}{2\pi R} ## since this is not a thin ring, but has a non-negligible width of ##2a##

I think that the toroid has a larger area than thin circle with a circumference ##2\pi R## so linear charge density should be less than that expression.

EDIT: How would we calculate the electric potential if the thickness was not neglected?

Many thanks !

Problem from:
https://www.ipho2021.lt/uplfiles/Th2.pdf
https://www.ipho2021.lt/uplfiles/Th2-Solution.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1675399479240.png
    1675399479240.png
    36.3 KB · Views: 100
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1675414550671.png
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
BvU said:
Thank you for your reply @BvU!

However, how would we calculate the electric potential if the thickness was not neglected?

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @BvU!

However, how would we calculate the electric potential if the thickness was not neglected?

Many thanks!
Since it is metallic, your first challenge would be to figure out the charge distribution. Good luck with that.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016, nasu and BvU
haruspex said:
Since it is metallic, your first challenge would be to figure out the charge distribution. Good luck with that.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex! Yeah that seems hard!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top