Calculating Kinetic Energy of a Segment: Where Did I Go Wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of a segment, where the original poster struggles with their solution and seeks help. Key errors identified include the incorrect use of 1 + sin(θ) instead of the correct expression and miscalculating the integral of sin(θ) as zero. An alternative approach using angular speed and distance from the point of contact is suggested, which simplifies the problem. The poster successfully corrects their calculations and inquires about the limits of integration, which are clarified to be from 0 to π. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate trigonometric representation and integration limits in solving kinetic energy problems.
Saitama
4,244
93

Homework Statement


(see attachment 1)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have attached my working, the correct answer is (A) but I can't see where I went wrong.

Any help is appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • ring.jpg
    ring.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 462
  • attempt.jpg
    attempt.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 446
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first line is wrong. How did you get 1+sin(θ)? You're measuring it down fron horizontal, so should be minus.
And in the last step, you've evaluated the integral of the sin(θ) part to zero. It won't be.

Another approach is to say the angular speed is v/R and work out the distance from the element to the point of contact.
 
haruspex said:
Your first line is wrong. How did you get 1+sin(θ)? You're measuring it down fron horizontal, so should be minus.
And in the last step, you've evaluated the integral of the sin(θ) part to zero. It won't be.
Oh yes, the integral sin(θ) won't be zero. I evaluated it correctly during the examination but did it wrong while posting up my attempt. :-p
I did the necessary corrections as you said and got the right answer. One more question, would the limits for integration change from 0 to -pi?

haruspex said:
Another approach is to say the angular speed is v/R and work out the distance from the element to the point of contact.
This approach is much easier. I am not much familiar with the instantaneous axis of rotation but this worked out pretty well. Thanks for the alternate method. :smile:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
One more question, would the limits for integration change from 0 to -pi?
No, you're measuring theta anticlockwise in the diagram from the "9 o'clock" position, so it will be 0 to pi.
 
haruspex said:
No, you're measuring theta anticlockwise in the diagram from the "9 o'clock" position, so it will be 0 to pi.

Got it, thanks haruspex!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top