Calculating the Moment from a Different Vantage Point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around recalculating moments in a 3D rigid dynamics problem after shifting the coordinate system from the center of mass to point A. The recalculated values showed discrepancies, particularly in inertia about the z and y-axes, which were multiplied by four. Despite including gravitational force effects, the results differed from the original solution, leading to confusion. Participants debated the location of the center of mass, with some suggesting that point A might actually be at the center of the rod. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of moment calculations in rigid body dynamics.
Tymofei
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Dynamics
Relevant Equations
General moment eq
Summary:: Just a simple 3d rigid dynamics question which I am trying to solve by placing coordinat system differently from original solution.Everything looks ok but results are different.

4TMCQ.png


Mod note: Post moved from technical section.
Thats my question.As you see coordinate system was located at center of mass.I just shifted it to point A and recalculated values.
Everything was same except Inertia about z and y-axis which was multiplied by 4.But at the same time moment effect coming from gravitational force was included to calculations so i thought they will cancel each other.But results was different than was mentioned on the original solution.
I know it looks nonsense trying to figure it when i already have solution but I am kind of obsessed .

By the way my values were:
My values for coordinate system placed at point 'A':

w_z = 6 rad/s

w_x = 2sin(theta) rad/s

w_y = 2cos(theta) rad/s

w_x/dt = 12cos(theta) rad/s^2

w_y/dt = -12sin(theta) rad/s^2

I_z = I_y = 6*10^-3 , I_x = I_xy = I_xz = I_yz = 0

Sum M_x = 0 = M_A_x

Sum M_y = 6*10^-3 * -12sin(theta)* -6*10^-3 * 12sin(theta) = -144* sin(theta)*10^-3 = M_A_y

Sum M_z = 6 * 10^-3 * 2 sin(2theta) = M_A_z - 0.8*9.81*0.075*sin(theta) ==> M_A_z = 6 * 10^-3 * 2 sin(2theta) + 0.8*9.81*0.075*sin(theta)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Tymofei said:
Thats my question.As you see coordinate system was located at center of mass.I just shifted it to point A and recalculated values.
I could be wrong, but I think that the center of mass of the rod is located at point ##A##. The rod passes through the slot in the table so that you see only half of the rod in the figure. Hope I'm not misinterpreting the problem statement.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
TSny said:
I could be wrong, but I think that the center of mass of the rod is located at point ##A##. The rod passes through the slot in the table so that you see only half of the rod in the figure. Hope I'm not misinterpreting the problem statement.
I don't thinks so,because in original solution it was placed at the center of rod,and inertia was calculated as '1/12*m*l^2' which gives you inertia about center of mass.
 
But isn't point ##A## at the center of the rod?
1589660785467.png
 
  • Like
Likes Tymofei, Delta2, PhDeezNutz and 1 other person
TSny said:
But isn't point ##A## at the center of the rod?
View attachment 262907

I didn't think so,but i guess you are right.
Thats the only way which explains .. thanks
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top