Can a Fish Move a Ball in Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Immelmann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
A fish placed in a plastic ball filled with water cannot effectively make the ball roll by swimming, as the system's closed nature means any force exerted by the fish is countered by an equal and opposite force. If the fish has the same density as water, it won't generate enough movement to create a net force, although theoretically, it could induce water flow that might cause the ball to spin via friction. The discussion also explores scenarios where the fish swims at angles to potentially create movement, but ultimately concludes that the forces balance out, preventing effective rolling. The complexities of fluid dynamics, such as eddies and negative pressure, further complicate the potential for movement. Overall, the consensus is that without an external force, the fish cannot move the ball effectively.
  • #201
metastable said:
@jbriggs444 would you infer that if the water has even slight compressibility (as it does, see: http://sites.bsyse.wsu.edu/joan/teaching/bsyse558/W2/Lec5Stu.pdf ), it can at least temporarily shift the outer glass ball slightly by pushing directly off the glass, regardless of whether the ball is floating in space, water or resting on a ground with or without friction between the ball and the contact point with ground?

jbriggs444 said:
Yes, making the fluid compressible de-couples the motion of the fish from the motion of the fluid sufficiently to allow brief mismatches between their respective momenta.
01820DDD-2555-42A6-BCDC-C63F5E785B86.jpeg

:partytime:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #202
metastable said:
So are we 100% sure the fish’s normal swimming ability doesn’t rely entirely on water’s slight compressibility?
I am 100% sure. The compressibility of water is completely irrelevant for swimming. The speeds involved in swimming are less than Mach 0.001 so any compressibility is absolutely irrelevant. It doesn't mean that the water is not compressible to some slight degree, but merely that the compressibility is not relevant to swimming. If you were to take a fish out of water and put it in an incompressible fluid of the same density and viscosity then it would swim exactly the same (unless it died from toxic effects).

metastable said:
If it can’t be proven a fish can move its nose forward through 100% incompressible fluid, the realism of any scenario modeling a fish swimming in such a fluid is called into question.
All modeling of swimming and most modeling of boats is done with the incompressible assumption. They go forward just fine, both in the models and in reality.

metastable said:
What force (if not differential pressure) causes the water molecules in front of the fish to move behind the fish as it swims in 100% incompressible fluid?
First, you are incorrect that an incompressible fluid can not have differential pressure. It should be obvious thinking about the vertical differential pressure in hydrostatic equilibrium. But there will also be differential pressures any time the fluid or any portion thereof is accelerating.

Second, you are neglecting shear stresses which occur regardless of compressibility. A lot of swimming, if not most, is based on shear forces rather than compressive forces.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
  • #203
metastable said:
...Or what if it starts swimming from the top of the ball, aiming directly towards a point just beside where the ball makes contact with the ground, building up kinetic energy as it swims downwards, and then it collides with the point next to the ball's point of contact with the ground it was aiming towards?
That's one smart fish! It should be posting here :-)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Swamp Thing, Dale and PeroK
  • #204
Immelmann said:
if you put a fish in a plastic ball filled with water, can the fish make the ball roll by swimming.

just like my hamster can make the ball roll by walking.

thanx.
The ball will roll backwards as the fish swims forward to keep the center of mass of the fish-water-ball system from moving forward.
 
  • #205
jbriggs444 said:
Yes, eddies in the water can be damped into heat. But you cannot cancel simply cancel bulk momentum or angular momentum into energy. If the fish is moving one way and the water another then the water has momentum that cannot be lost in the absence of an interaction with either ball or fish.

Edit: Or gravity -- if there is air in the ball along with the water.
Bingo - if there is air also in the ball.
 
  • #206
phinds said:
The ball, water, and fish are a closed system. What external force do you think there is that would make the ball move?
The hamster in the ball is a closed system too yet the hamster can roll the ball.
 
  • #207
arydberg said:
The hamster in the ball is a closed system too yet the hamster can roll the ball.
You obviously have not read the thread. This was addressed very early on (post #4). The hampster can change the center of mass of the system. The fish cannot.
 
  • Like
Likes Jbraddy2
  • #208
Has anyone mentioned that the force counteracting the fish’ directional force would not be linear? Also, will the counteracting forces experience an equal amount of molecular resistance/friction? Is that where the density comes into play?
 
Back
Top