Can Kindergarten STR Math Solve Polchinski's Paradox?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eigenzeitt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of resolving Polchinski's paradox using basic concepts from special relativity (STR). A quote from Kip Thorne's book suggests that this approach could be viable, although the analysis may lack a relativistic framework. A referenced paper indicates that the billiard balls in question were not analyzed under relativistic conditions. There is uncertainty about whether a relativistic case has been explored in existing literature. Further insights or research on this topic are welcomed.
eigenzeitt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to get rid of Polchinski's paradox with kindergarten STR maths?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This online quote from Kip Thorne's excellent semi-popular book "Black Holes & Timewarps" says yes. [add]But the analysis may not be relativistic.
 
Last edited:
A more detailed paper would be http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v44/i4/p1077_1 (but I haven't read it personally, it's on my to-read list).

Reading this paper seems to suggest that the billiard balls analyzed were not relativistic, though. I don't know for sure if anyone has done the relativistic case.
 
Last edited:
Your help is very much appreciated. Thank you.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
8K
  • · Replies 122 ·
5
Replies
122
Views
8K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K