Can someone explain the concept of Mass-Energy Equivalence in simple terms?

AI Thread Summary
Mass-energy equivalence, expressed as E=mc², describes the relationship between mass and energy, indicating that energy differences correspond to mass differences multiplied by the speed of light squared. The discussion highlights confusion around the concept of relativistic momentum and energy, emphasizing that both are influenced by the observer's frame of reference. Momentum, defined as mass times speed, is considered relative because both mass and speed can vary depending on the observer. Additionally, energy is also deemed relative, as it is calculated using the mass and the square of the speed. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the principles of relativity in physics.
skoks
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My textbook is only confusing me further and I need to understand this for a presentation in front of the class! The chapter is entitled Mass-Energy Equivalence, with sub titles Relativistic Momentum and Relativistic Energy. I don't understand relativity, I'm reading the first part of the unit to understand it now.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass-energy equivalence is the formula stating the relationship between energy & mass. Also known as E = mc^2. It states that the difference in Energy is equal to the difference in mass time time the speed of light squared. Wikipedia has a page on it if you search E=mc2.
 
I understand this but I don't understand how momentum can be relative... What is dilated mass?How can energy be relative aswell?
 
skoks said:
I understand this but I don't understand how momentum can be relative... What is dilated mass?How can energy be relative aswell?
momentum is "mass times speed". Since both mass and speed are "relative", how could momentum NOT be? Likewise, energy is "1/2 mass times speed squared" so it also is relative to the viewer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top