Can We Observe the Growth of Black Holes and Their Mysterious Processes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ukmicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observation and understanding of black holes, particularly their growth and the processes involved. Black holes cannot be directly observed; instead, they are detected through the emissions from the accretion disc of matter heated as it approaches the event horizon. Once matter crosses the event horizon, it cannot escape, and the effects of the black hole's mass influence the surrounding space gravitationally, similar to any other mass. The concept of Hawking radiation suggests that black holes can lose mass, but this remains a controversial theory. Overall, the nature of black holes and their interactions with matter continues to be a complex and largely theoretical field of study.
ukmicky
Messages
114
Reaction score
1
This may sound silly but is it possible to see a black hole grow, how do we know that black holes consume and hold onto most of what they attract. Unseen by us could black holes convert ordinary matter into something unknown like dark matter made from wimps for example, which are immediately re-emitted back out into space.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well it is all just a theory right now, we are not totally sure if black holes can do anything at all. But from the fact that there is no light in a small circlular area has to mean something. And if the black hole does take things in it has to put it some place. So what you are getting at is a really tough question that will be answered sometime.
 
Two comments:

1) Black holes have never been directly observed in the sense that DyeeyD suggested: as a "blank spot" in a field of stars. Instead, they are detected indirectly by the emissions of matter, outside the hole, which is heated as it falls inward toward the hole. Such matter is in the so-called "accretion disc" which surrounds the black hole itself.

2) Nothing which falls into a black hole (i.e. which crosses the event horizon) ever comes back out. Nothing, in any form, even massless photons, can escape from within a black hole's event horizon.

Hawking radiation is a process by which a black hole can appear to lose mass, but it is a fundamentally quantum-mechanical process which actually happens immediately outside a black hole's event horizon. Once inside, nothing ever gets back out.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
Two comments:
Nothing which falls into a black hole (i.e. which crosses the event horizon) ever comes back out. Nothing, in any form, even massless photons, can escape from within a black hole's event horizon.
- Warren
Thankyou for the replies

1st
As its impossible to see anything cross through the Event horizon , how do we know that anything does, Is it just a theory,is there any proof.

2nd
if its true that nothing can come out of a black hole as nothing can cross out wards through the EH, how does the mass inside affect the space outside, why isn't the effects of the mass at the singularity confined to the singularity side of the EH
 
Last edited:
1. It would be possible, in theory. We don't currently have any black holes close enough, or any telescopes large enough, to actually "observe" such an event, however.

2. This is correct. Once inside the event horizon, all possible futures end at the singularity. To the outside world, the black hole appears gravitationally to be a mass like any other. In the same way, the Sun would influence the Earth in the same way no matter what substance it were made of. Technically speaking, in the limit of large distances, effects like tidal forces become negligible; the only important gravitational characteristic of a distant body is its mass.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
Hawking radiation is a process by which a black hole can appear to lose mass, but it is a fundamentally quantum-mechanical process which actually happens immediately outside a black hole's event horizon. Once inside, nothing ever gets back out.

Hawking radiation, if correct, is a process by which a small black hole does lose mass. Hawking radiation occurs on the very threshold of the event horizon. The concept remains controversial; it is still viewed as a conjecture by many.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top