Can You Derive F = gamma^3*ma from Newton's Second Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter beecher
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation F = gamma^3 * ma from Newton's second law, where F = dp/dt and p = gamma * mv. Participants express confusion about the derivation process, particularly how to handle the differentiation of gamma, which is dependent on velocity. Clarifications suggest that instead of integrating, one should directly differentiate and rearrange the terms for simplicity. Key insights include expressing gamma in a more manageable form and using the chain rule for differentiation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between force, momentum, and relativistic effects in physics.
beecher
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Newton's second law is given by F = dp/dt. If the force is always parallel to the velocity, show that F = gamma3ma

Homework Equations



p = gamma*mv
gamma = 1/(1-v2/c2)1/2

The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no clue where to begin. This is what I've done so far, but I don't think I'm even on the right track.

F = dp/dt = gamma3ma = [1/(1-v2/c2)1/2]3ma
=1/(1-v2/c2)3/2ma
=1/(1 - 3v2/c2 + 3v4/c4 - v6/c6)1/2ma

Thats as far as i get on the right side.

For the left, all i can manage is dp/dt = d/dx p = d/dx gamma*mv
This is where I get confused. gamma and m are constant, so does dp/dt = gamma*m*dv/dt?

Some clarification would be great.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you in Modern Physics and answering this for your Russian Prof?
 
You're taking the hard route, you're trying to integrate the given expression, into the derivative. Just take the derivative, and rearrange.

Some pointers:

Express \gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}=({1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}})^{-\tfrac{1}{2}

That should make taking the derivative much more simple.

Another bit that should help you is: \frac{d({1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}})}{dt}=\frac{-2v\cdot\dot v}{c^2}
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K