- #71
Smurf
- 443
- 3
No it's not. What about weapons that increase suffering without increasing efficiency (i.e. serrated blades, in the rules of war since ww1) or weapons that have a high chance of inflicting civilian casualties as well (Chem, Bio, Nuke)?Daminc said:"Arguing about the rules that state that you have to kill the enemy in a nice way is just plain stupid."
On what grounds do you call these "stupid"?
Last edited: