Clifford Algebras & Physics: What do You Think?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Plat00n
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Clifford Algebras (GA) are being explored for their applications in physics, particularly beyond traditional uses like gamma matrices. The discussion highlights the potential of using both the complex center subgroup and the even subgroup in quantum mechanics, suggesting that current mathematical approaches may be inadequate. Participants express curiosity about the intuitive nature of Clifford Algebras compared to other algebraic methods such as vector and tensor calculus. The conversation encourages further investigation into how these algebras could enhance understanding in physics. Overall, the exploration of Clifford Algebras presents a promising avenue for advancing mathematical formulations in the field.
Plat00n
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm curious about Clifford Algebras,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_algebra ,
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/topics/QuaternionsandCliffordAlgebras.html
and their applications in physics
http://modelingnts.la.asu.edu/
http://www.ajnpx.com/html/CliffordAlgebra.html
beyond that of the "gamma matrices".

I'm not well-read enough to say how useful they are and how intuitive they may be compared to other less-encompassing algebraic approaches (e.g. vector-calculus, exterior-calculus, tensor-calculus, spinor-calculus, etc...). Time-permitting, it might be fun to look into it.
my $0.02
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clifford

Clifford Algebras have another interesting thing, that is that is composed by two sub groups, one the complex (center subgroup) and the other, even subgroup (even subgroup). In quantum mechanics, we utilize the center group, but I have read a book that utilizes the wave function in mathematics of the even subgroup, and it's very interesting question.

It's possible that we are utilizing wrong mathematics to the right formulation.

The post before linked talks about it.

Plat00n.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top