Components of Earth's angular velocity vector

AI Thread Summary
To find the components of the Earth's angular velocity vector (w) at a latitude of 34 degrees, the discussion emphasizes using a coordinate system where x and y are oriented east and north, respectively, and z points radially outward from the Earth's center. The equations for apparent gravitational acceleration and its components are referenced, but there is uncertainty about how to apply them to determine w. The proposed solution involves projecting w onto the axes, suggesting that w can be expressed as w = wsin(lambda)j + wcos(lambda)k. The conversation also touches on the perceived difficulty of the problem relative to its marking scheme. The discussion ultimately highlights the straightforward nature of the calculations involved.
captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using a coordinate system in whic x and y are due east and nort of the city and z is the radial distance outwards from te centre of te earth, find the compnents of w the Earth's angular velocity vector. You may assume that the latitude of the city is lamdba = 34degrees.


Homework Equations


I know that apparent gravitational acceleration g*=g-w x (w x r) and that gh* = w^2 rsin(lambda)cos(lambda) and gv* = g-w^2 r sin(lambda)^2. But I am not sure how to fit this all together to find w


The Attempt at a Solution


Any suggestions or help much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the diagram for this is in the notes. chapter 5 page 4. w is going vertically upward, mark on the x,y and z axes (into the page, toward north pole and radially outward respectively). now its just a case of projecting w onto the relative axes.
 
So is it just w= wsin(lambda)j +wcos(lamdba)k as stated in section 6.3? How is writing this down worth 4 marks?
 
More Edinburgh people! It's only 2 marks. But yeah it's that easy.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top