Confusion about whether to use the specific heat of water or ice

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion between using the specific heat of ice versus water in heat transfer calculations. It clarifies that when ice melts, it first reaches 0°C before becoming water, which is why the specific heat of ice (2100 J/kg°C) is used in some calculations. In contrast, when considering the heat transfer after the ice has melted, only the specific heat of water (4190 J/kg°C) is relevant. The participants confirm that Chegg's approach is correct, as it reflects the necessary steps of heating the ice before melting it. Understanding the phases of the substances involved is crucial for accurate thermal equilibrium calculations.
bluesteels
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A copper calorimeter can with mass 0.100 kg contains 0.160 kg of water and 0.0180 kg of ice in thermal equilibrium at atmospheric pressure. If 0.750 kg of lead at 255°C is dropped into the calorimeter can, what is the final temperature? Assume that no heat is lost to the surroundings?"
Relevant Equations
Q=mc delta T
Q=mL (latent heat)
My thought process of how i do the ice melting part: (note I just ignore the copper/lead part cause I already know how to do that part)

Q_ice + Q_melt + Q_liquid so, it 0.018(2100)T+0.16(4190)T+0.018(334*10^3)

but on chegg they didn't use 2100 but they just use 4190 instead and I am confused on why they did that.

Like i know it because ice melting into water but if that the case how come this problem below they don't even use it

"In a container of negligible mass, 0.200 kg of ice at an initial temperature of -40.0°C is mixed with a mass m of water that has an initial temperature of 80.0°C. No heat is lost to the surroundings. If the final temperature of the system is 28.0°C, what is the mass m of the water that was initially at 80.0°C?"

For this problem they did

0.2(2100)(40)+0.2(334*10^3)+0.2(4190)(80). if that was the case earlier then wouldn't you sub. 2100 for 4190 for this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ice melts at 0 degrees Celsius.
 
What is the initial temperature of the system ? (reasonably obvious : it's "in thermal equilibrium")
 
Assuming that the final temperature is high enough for all the ice to melt, the amount of heat (in Joules) that was transferred to the part that was initially ice was $$Q_I=0.18(0-0)+0.18(334000)+0.18(4190)(T-0)$$And the amount of heat that was transferred to the part that was initially water was $$Q_W=0.16(4100)(T-0)$$where 0C was the initial temperature of the water-ice bath.
 
bluesteels said:
My thought process of how i do the ice melting part: (note I just ignore the copper/lead part cause I already know how to do that part)

Q_ice + Q_melt + Q_liquid so, it 0.018(2100)T+0.16(4190)T+0.018(334*10^3)

but on chegg they didn't use 2100 but they just use 4190 instead and I am confused on why they did that.

Like i know it because ice melting into water but if that the case how come this problem below they don't even use it
For this problem, you are not heating-up any ice. You are:
- melting 0.0180kg of ice at 0ºC so it becomes water;
- then heating 0.160kg and 0.0180kg of water from 0ºC to TºC.

Chegg is correct

bluesteels said:
For this [second] problem they did

0.2(2100)(40)+0.2(334*10^3)+0.2(4190)(80). if that was the case earlier then wouldn't you sub. 2100 for 4190 for this problem.
In the second question, part of the process is to heat 0.20kg of ice from -40ºC to 0ºC (before it can melt). That’s why the answer contains “0.2(2100)(40) “.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top