I Coordinate System Transformation: Lowering/Raising Indices Explained

GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
In《Introducing Einstein's Relativity Ed 2》on page 106"lowering the first index with the metric,then it is easy to establish,for example by using geodesic coordinates..."
In 《A First Course in General Relativity - 2nd Edition》on page 159 "If we lower the index a,we get(in the locally flat coordinate system at its origin P)..."
What is the relationship between lowering or raising index and coordinate system transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only relationship is that the components of the "lowered" Riemann tensor ##R_{abcd}## have a particularly simple form in that locally flat coordinate system.
Schutz uses that locally flat coordinate system in his presentation because it enables him to develop a fairly simple formula for Riemann tensor components in terms of metric components like ##g^{ab}## and ##g_{bu,sv}##, rather than in terms of Christoffel symbols (equation 6.63).
He gets a fairly simple formula for ##R^a{}_{bcd}## in that coordinate system (equation 6.65) and then gets an even simpler formula (equation 6.67) for ##R_{abcd}##, ie by lowering the first index.
Most tensor formulas will have coordinate systems in which their component formulas are simple, and in other systems they will be horribly complex. A key challenge in GR is to choose the coordinate system in which the component formulas will be simple and easy(er) to manipulate.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix, vanhees71, GR191511 and 1 other person
andrewkirk said:
The only relationship is that the components of the "lowered" Riemann tensor ##R_{abcd}## have a particularly simple form in that locally flat coordinate system.
Schutz uses that locally flat coordinate system in his presentation because it enables him to develop a fairly simple formula for Riemann tensor components in terms of metric components like ##g^{ab}## and ##g_{bu,sv}##, rather than in terms of Christoffel symbols (equation 6.63).
He gets a fairly simple formula for ##R^a{}_{bcd}## in that coordinate system (equation 6.65) and then gets an even simpler formula (equation 6.67) for ##R_{abcd}##, ie by lowering the first index.
Most tensor formulas will have coordinate systems in which their component formulas are simple, and in other systems they will be horribly complex. A key challenge in GR is to choose the coordinate system in which the component formulas will be simple and easy(er) to manipulate.
Thank you!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top