Could Dark Matter Form Planets and Stars?

AI Thread Summary
Dark Matter, being immune to electromagnetic forces, primarily interacts through gravity, raising questions about its potential to form celestial bodies like planets and stars. If Dark Matter could clump together, it might create massive structures, potentially leading to the formation of Dark Stars, which would generate no light. However, without a force similar to electromagnetism, Dark Matter could collapse into dense points, resembling black holes. The discussion suggests that Dark Matter is more likely to form black holes than regular matter, but if Dark Matter particles are fermions, degeneracy pressure could prevent collapse until sufficient mass accumulates. Ultimately, the prevalence of Dark Matter in the universe indicates it could significantly contribute to the mass of existing black holes.
sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
Since Dark Matter is by definition immune to electromagnetic forces, then it has no other way to interact except through gravity -- unless one wants to come up with some entirely new force, which has never been seen.

If Dark Matter did have some force of its own, akin to electromagnetism, that would allow it to clump together, then what would happen is that you'd have these super-large clumps (Dark Matter Planets, etc) which would be floating around, showing off their gravitational effects in very concentrated ways.

But planets and stars are held together by gravity, and not electromagnetism. So if Dark Matter can gravitate to itself, then couldn't it form Dark Stars?
A Dark Star would generate no light, of course. But if it had no force similar to electromagnetism to push apart from itself, then it would all just concentrate into one single dense point -- like a black hole.

So it would seem that Dark Matter would be more likely than regular matter to form black holes, right? That's what I can infer from all of this.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well, if dark matter particles (whatever they may be) are fermions, then there would be something akin to electron degeneracy pressure inside a dark matter star (should such a beast exist) that would prevent said star collapsing until there was enough mass to produce a gravitational force to overcome this. Therefore there would be something to prevent collapse. I don't actually know if dark matter is posited to be fermionic however.

I can't really comment on anything else, other than speculation, as i am not as knowledgeable hear as i would like to (or infact used to be, as a astrophysics turned physical chemistry student). Interesting though.
 
One strong candidate for dark matter is the neutralino which is supersymmetric and it's own anti-particle meaning it would annihilate if it came into close proximity with it-self.
 
Last edited:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20081106/sc_space/mysteriousdarkmattermightactuallyglow

If Dark Matter started forming into a tight sphere, then ordinary matter would also be drawn in, so it is not likely that there should be pure Dark Stars or Dark Holes. DM is about five times as prevalent in the universe as ordinary matter, so I suppose you could infer that most of the mass in black holes is from DM, too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top