Covariant derivative in coordinate basis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the covariant derivative of a vector field in a coordinate basis, specifically proving that the expression for the divergence of a vector field, ##\nabla_{\mu} A^{\mu}##, can be rewritten in terms of the partial derivative of the determinant of the metric tensor. The derivation shows that the first and third terms of the Christoffel symbols cancel, leading to a simplified expression involving the determinant of the metric. The user expresses confusion about the assumptions made, questioning why the result seems applicable only to coordinate bases and whether the expression is general. Additionally, there is a request for clarification on the most general form of the Christoffel symbols that does not depend on a specific frame. The discussion highlights the nuances of working with covariant derivatives in different bases.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Captura de tela de 2022-05-15 06-19-28.png


I need to evaluate ##\nabla_{\mu} A^{\mu}## at coordinate basis. Indeed, i should prove that ##\nabla_{\mu} A^{\mu} = \frac{1}{\sqrt(|g|)}\partial_{\mu}(|g|^{1/2} A^{\mu})##.

So, $$\nabla_{\mu} A^{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} A^{\mu} + A^{\beta} \Gamma^{\mu}_{\beta \mu}$$

The first and third terms of Christoffel will cancel, so $$ = \partial_{\mu}A^{\mu} + A^{\beta} \frac{g^{\mu x}}{2}(\partial_{\beta}g_{x \mu})$$

Now, using the fact that ##\delta g = g g^{\mu v} \delta g_{\mu v}##, we can easily find that $$\frac{g^{\mu x}}{2}(\partial_{\beta}g_{x \mu}) = \frac{\partial_{\beta}(|g|^{1/2})}{|g|^{1/2}}$$

After substitute this at our main expression, we can recover ##\nabla_{\mu} A^{\mu} = \frac{1}{\sqrt(|g|)}\partial_{\mu}(|g|^{1/2} A^{\mu})##.

The problem is, i have no idea what assumption i have made so that my result applies only to coordinate basis! That is, the problem ask for prove it at coordinate basis , so i guess it should be true only at these type of basis. But i haven't assumed nothing, just manipulate the terms and got the result. What am i missing? Is this expression really general like i have found?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have used the coordinate expression for the Christoffel symbols.
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
Orodruin said:
You have used the coordinate expression for the Christoffel symbols.
I know there are another expressions for Christoffel symbol, like:
$$\Gamma^{i}_{jk} = - \partial e^{i}/\partial x^{j} e_{k}$$
But i didn't know that this expression i have used is not the most general. What is the most general expression for it so? (namely, the one that makes no reference to any frame)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top