MHB Derivative of a Real-Valued Function of Several Variables: Junghenn Defn 9.1.3

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Hugo D. Junghenn's book: "A Course in Real Analysis" ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 9: "Differentiation on $\mathbb{R}^n$"

I need some help with an aspect of Definition 9.1.3 ...

Definition 9.1.3 and the relevant accompanying text read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7865
View attachment 7866

At the top of the above text, in Definition 9.1.3 we read the following text:

" ... ... there exists a vector $$f'(a)$$ in $$\mathbb{R}^n$$ ... ... "My question is as follows:

How (arguing from the definition of derivative) do we indicate\demonstrate\prove that $$f'(a) \in \mathbb{R}^n$$ ... ...?Hope someone can help ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have to prove it. This is a definition (no proofs allowed). The definition is saying that if there's a vector $f'(\mathbf{a})$ satisfying the definition, then we call it the derivative. The definition is not actually claiming that the vector exists (it doesn't always, depending on $f$).
 
Ackbach said:
You don't have to prove it. This is a definition (no proofs allowed). The definition is saying that if there's a vector $f'(\mathbf{a})$ satisfying the definition, then we call it the derivative. The definition is not actually claiming that the vector exists (it doesn't always, depending on $f$).
Thanks Ackbach ...

Appreciate the help...

Peter
 
I posted this question on math-stackexchange but apparently I asked something stupid and I was downvoted. I still don't have an answer to my question so I hope someone in here can help me or at least explain me why I am asking something stupid. I started studying Complex Analysis and came upon the following theorem which is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: Let ##f:D\to\mathbb{C}## be an anlytic function over a simply connected region ##D##. If ##a## and ##z## are part of...
Back
Top