Dielectric boundary value problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter lys04
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In solving dielectric boundary value problems, the introduction of an image charge in the z<0 region is necessary to accurately represent the electric potential. The image charge, while located at the same position as the original charge, has a different value, denoted as ##q''##, which is determined through analysis. The potential ##\phi_1## is calculated under the assumption that the dielectric material ##\varepsilon_1## extends throughout all space, affecting the image charge in the z>0 region. Similarly, the potential ##\phi_2## is derived with the assumption that the yellow dielectric ##\varepsilon_2## also permeates all space. This approach ensures a comprehensive understanding of the electric field behavior across the dielectric boundaries.
lys04
Messages
144
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Why in this problem when solving for the electric potential in the z<0 region we introduce another image charge that is the same as the original charge instead of just using the original charge? I don't really get the explanation they provide.
Relevant Equations
$$\vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}$$
1745389441297.png

1745389455722.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hard to read.
The text should be fixed. It is not clear.
 
lys04 said:
Homework Statement: Why in this problem when solving for the electric potential in the z<0 region we introduce another image charge that is the same as the original charge instead of just using the original charge?
When finding the potential ##\phi_1## in region z<0, the image charge is not the same as the original charge. The image charge has the same location as the original charge, but the charge of the image is ##q''##, which differs from the original charge ##q##. The value of ##q''## will be determined in the analysis.

Also, when writing the potential ##\phi_1##, we imagine that the purple dielectric ##\varepsilon_1## extends throughout all of space: both z < 0 and z > 0. Thus, although ##q''## is located in the region ##z > 0##, ##q''## is taken to be immersed in dielectric material with ##\varepsilon_1##.
That's why you see this figure
1745430570324.png


Likewise, in writing the potential for ##\phi_2##, the yellow dielectric ##\varepsilon_2## is assumed to extend throughout all of space.
1745430531692.png
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top