Does element x present a linear resistance?

AI Thread Summary
Element x does not exhibit linear resistance as its behavior changes with varying current and voltage. While the initial answer is close, it contains minor inaccuracies in the significant figures of the measurements. The discussion suggests that a graph of resistance calculations at different points would clarify understanding. The term 'linear resistance' is deemed inappropriate, with 'constant resistance' being a more accurate description. Ultimately, the resistance appears constant within the measurement uncertainties.
Purpleshinyrock
Messages
27
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Consider the element X represented in the figure, for which
know the voltage and current values indicated in the following table:
Relevant Equations
V=RI, R=V/I
ANSWER: element x does not present a linear resistance because it isn't constant as i and v increases.

Screenshot 2021-11-07 at 18-09-20 Microsoft Word - IC_EX_CAP1 - Exer_Cap1 pdf.png
Is my answer correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's close, but one of the readings is a bit off (to the 3 significant figures shown in the measurements). To be sure, it would be nice if they specified an accuracy for those measurements, IMO. It looks like the one flier measurement is only off by about 0.4%...
 
  • Like
Likes Purpleshinyrock
Perhaps you could show us your calculations of resistance at these various points? I find it easiest to graph these in a spreadsheet, myself. This will help us see if you are understanding the concept of resistance better than a simple yes/no response.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics, phinds and Purpleshinyrock
The term ‘linear resistance’ doesn’t seem appropriate. Is this a translation from another language or maybe part of a longer question? Maybe ‘constant resistance’ is what is intended.

The data supplied are given to only 2 or 3 significant figures. Rounding according to the usual convention gives:
R = 1.18/0.25 = 4.72Ω which rounded to 2 sig. figs. gives 4.7Ω
R = 2.35/0.50 = 4.70Ω which rounded to 2 sig. figs. gives 4.7 Ω
R = 5.88/1.25 – 4.704Ω which rounded to 3 sig. figs. gives 4.70 Ω
R = 9.40/2.00 = 4.70Ω which rounded to 3 sig. figs. gives 4.70 Ω

So my answer would be that: within the limits of the measurement-uncertainties, the resistance is constant.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and Purpleshinyrock
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top