I Does the Topology of AdS4 Affect Global Hyperbolicity?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbolic
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Is ##\mathrm{AdS_4}## globally hyperbolic?$$g = -\left(1+ \dfrac{r^2}{l^2} \right)dt^2 + \dfrac{dr^2}{1+ \dfrac{r^2}{l^2}}+ r^2d\Omega^2$$Letting ##r = l \tan \chi## then defining ##\tilde{g} = g \cos^2 \chi##\begin{align*}
g &= \sec^2 \chi (-dt^2 + l^2 d\chi^2) + l^2 \tan^2 \chi d\Omega^2 \\ \\

\tilde{g} &= -dt^2 + l^2 (d\chi^2 + \sin^2 \chi d\Omega^2) \\
\tilde{g} &= -dt^2 + l^2 d\omega^2\end{align*}the topology is ##\mathbb{R} \times S^3##. Does global hyperbolicity of ##\tilde{g}## ##\iff## global hyperbolicity of ##g##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know anything about string theory, but isn't that coordinate system a mapping to ##\mathbb{R^2} \times S^2## not ##\mathbb{R^1} \times S^3##? It looks like only two angles and a radius to me (plus time). Am I missing something?

If I'm missing something obvious, ignore me. I just chimed in because the thread went unanswered.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
My thinking was that ##l^2(d\chi^2 + \sin^2 \chi d\Omega^2)## is the round metric on a ##3##-sphere of radius ##l## (or in fact since ##\chi \in \bigg{[} 0, \dfrac{\pi}{2} \bigg{)}## it'll only be half of the 3-sphere...)
 
Last edited:
Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing, when you say ##S^3##, you mean a surface embedded in ##\mathbb{R}^4## given by ##x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + w^2 = 1##, right? As in, the sphere that is diffeomorphic to the special orthogonal group ##\mathrm{SO}(3)## and the special unitary group ##\mathrm{SU}(2)##, right?
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Yeah, and ##(\chi, \theta, \varphi)## would be the hyperspherical coordinates on the 3-sphere of radius ##l##.
 
I'm a dope and I only just caught that ##d\Omega^2## was a total solid angle over ##S^2##. Now I'm on board with your claim about the topology. Sorry for derailing ya
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top